Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Auckland · New Zealand

National Foundation for the Deaf

Research works
4
fractional, all time
Citations
51
13.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.6%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
28%
world 40%
International
49%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: National Foundation for the Deaf is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does National Foundation for the Deaf work in?

In all years, 58% of research at National Foundation for the Deaf is in Health Sciences, 26% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (58%), Social Sciences (26%), Immunology and Microbiology (8%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Life Sciences16%Health Sciences58%Social Sciences26%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 4 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine257.9%
    1. Social Sciences126.3%
    1. Immunology and Microbiology07.9%
    2. Neuroscience07.9%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

What are the most cited papers from National Foundation for the Deaf?

The most cited paper from National Foundation for the Deaf is "Pneumococcal Middle Ear Infection and Cochlear Implantation" (R. G. Berkowitz, Burkhard K.-H. G. Franz, Robert K. Shepherd et al., 1987), with 15 citations. Next come "Congenital rubella syndrome" (4) and "Potential focus of fetuses unprotected against rubella" (2).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Pneumococcal Middle Ear Infection and Cochlear Implantation R. G. Berkowitz, Burkhard K.-H. G. Franz, Robert K. Shepherd et al. · Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology 1987 15
2 Congenital rubella syndrome Adrian K. Thomas, Noel McK Bennett, SAMUEL FISH et al. · The Medical Journal of Australia Oct 1986 4
3 Potential focus of fetuses unprotected against rubella Adrian K. Thomas · The Medical Journal of Australia Dec 1991 2
4 Immunisation — lifting our game Adrian K. Thomas · The Medical Journal of Australia Feb 1998 1
5 Rubella vaccination Adrian K. Thomas · The Medical Journal of Australia Mar 1993 0
All 7 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does National Foundation for the Deaf publish most on?

By volume: Ear Surgery and Otitis Media, Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse, Virology and Viral Diseases and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis.

  1. 1 Ear Surgery and Otitis Media Otorhinolaryngology 0 works
  2. 2 Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  3. 3 Virology and Viral Diseases Epidemiology 0 works
  4. 4 Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  5. 5 Social Work Education and Practice Public Administration 0 works
  6. 6 Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
  7. 7 Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment Physiology 0 works
  8. 8 Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works
  9. 9 Bacterial Infections and Vaccines Microbiology 0 works
  10. 10 Head and Neck Anomalies Surgery 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available27.7%not open72.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors48.9%domestic only51.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has National Foundation for the Deaf's research output changed?

199019952000200520102015
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Auckland

All research institutions in Auckland

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about National Foundation for the Deaf. Posts are plain text and can be reported.