Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Institution · Lexington · United States

Phi Gamma Delta

Research works
2
▼ 56% vs 2018-21
Citations
19
8.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
66%
world 40%
International
62%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Phi Gamma Delta is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Phi Gamma Delta work in?

In all years, 46% of research at Phi Gamma Delta is in Social Sciences, 37% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (25%), Medicine (17%), Psychology (17%).

Life Sciences8%Physical Sciences8%Health Sciences37%Social Sciences46%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 10 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences125.0%
    2. Psychology016.7%
    3. Decision Sciences04.2%
    1. Medicine016.7%
    2. Health Professions012.5%
    3. Nursing08.3%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology04.2%
    2. Neuroscience04.2%
    1. Computer Science04.2%
    2. Engineering04.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

What are the most cited papers from Phi Gamma Delta?

The most cited paper from Phi Gamma Delta is "Measurement of Students’ Perceptions of Nursing as a Career" (Robin E Matutina, Susan Dunreath Newman, Carolyn M. Jenkins, 2010), with 19 citations. Next come "Charting the uncharted: Mapping scientific publications on online disinhibition effect in the digital space via bibliometrics and network analyses" (13) and "Development and validation of interprofessional learning assessment tool for health professionals in continuing professional development (CPD)" (13).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Measurement of Students’ Perceptions of Nursing as a Career Robin E Matutina, Susan Dunreath Newman, Carolyn M. Jenkins · Journal of Nursing Scholarship 16 Aug 2010 19
2 Charting the uncharted: Mapping scientific publications on online disinhibition effect in the digital space via bibliometrics and network analyses Michael Joseph S. Diño, Joseph Carlo Vital, Christopher Patricio et al. · Computers in Human Behavior Reports Open access 23 Sep 2023 13
3 Development and validation of interprofessional learning assessment tool for health professionals in continuing professional development (CPD) Irvin L. Ong, Michael Joseph S. Diño, Maria Minerva P Calimag et al. · PLoS ONE Open access 25 Jan 2019 13
4 Behavioral Economics: A New Lens for Understanding Genomic Decision Making Scott Emory Moore, Holley Hewitt Ulbrich, Kenneth W. Hepburn et al. · Journal of Nursing Scholarship Open access 24 Apr 2018 7
5 Developing a valid and reliable assessment of knowledge translation (KT) for continuing professional development program of health professionals Irvin L. Ong, Michael Joseph S. Diño, Maria Minerva P Calimag et al. · PeerJ Open access 13 Aug 2018 5
All 9 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Phi Gamma Delta publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Misinformation and Its Impacts, Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies, Mentoring and Academic Development and Ego Development and Educational Practices.

  1. 1 Misinformation and Its Impacts Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  2. 2 Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies Clinical Psychology 0 works
  3. 3 Mentoring and Academic Development Social Psychology 0 works
  4. 4 Ego Development and Educational Practices Clinical Psychology 0 works
  5. 5 Impact of Technology on Adolescents Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  6. 6 Mental Health Research Topics Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available66.0%not open34.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors61.7%domestic only38.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Phi Gamma Delta's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 56% lower than in 2018-2021.

20152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Lexington

All research institutions in Lexington

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Phi Gamma Delta. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.