Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Government institution · Richmond · United States

Richmond Behavioral Health Authority

Research works
31
▲ 3% vs 2018-21
Citations
452
14.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
18%
world 40%
International
20%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Richmond Behavioral Health Authority is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Richmond Behavioral Health Authority work in?

In all years, 72% of research at Richmond Behavioral Health Authority is in Health Sciences, 16% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (43%), Health Professions (28%), Psychology (5%). It does 2.5× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 22 fractional works · 71.6% of its workMedicine: 13 fractional works · 43.2% of its workEmergency Medicine: 5 fractional works · 16.8% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 1 fractional works · 4.1% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workPhysiology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workOtorhinolaryngology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Professions: 9 fractional works · 27.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 3 fractional works · 9.2% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 3 fractional works · 9.0% of its workHealth Information Management: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workMedical Laboratory Technology: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 16.5% of its workPsychology: 2 fractional works · 5.4% of its workClinical Psychology: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.7% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workPhysical Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.6% of its workEngineering: 2 fractional works · 5.2% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 1 fractional works · 3.2% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOrganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSensory Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKRichmondBehavioral Healt…31fractional works, all years
Life Sciences4%Physical Sciences8%Health Sciences72%Social Sciences16%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 16 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1343.2%
    2. Health Professions927.9%
    3. Nursing00.6%
    1. Psychology25.4%
    2. Social Sciences14.7%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance12.2%
    4. Decision Sciences11.8%
    5. Arts and Humanities01.4%
    6. Business, Management and Accounting01.0%
    1. Engineering25.2%
    2. Chemistry01.1%
    3. Mathematics01.1%
    4. Computer Science00.3%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology12.2%
    2. Neuroscience01.1%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Health Professions: 18.42× its world share, 2 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 2.05× its world share, 1 worksMedicineNursing: 10.51× its world share, 0 worksNursingDecision Sciences: 0.80× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 1.35× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.16× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 18.4×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 6 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions18.42×2 works
  2. Nursing10.51×0 works
  3. Medicine2.05×1 works
  4. Psychology1.35×0 works
  5. Decision Sciences0.80×0 works
  6. Social Sciences0.16×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Richmond Behavioral Health Authority?

Ranked on the quality score, Jerry Overton and Rob Lawrence lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Richmond Behavioral Health Authority.

  1. 1 Jerry Overton United States · #1,613,789 worldwide 846 citations · 41 works
  2. 2 Rob Lawrence United States · #2,935,312 worldwide 158 citations · 22 works
All ranked researchers at Richmond Behavioral Health Authority

What are the most cited papers from Richmond Behavioral Health Authority?

The most cited paper from Richmond Behavioral Health Authority is "Use of an Automated, Load-Distributing Band Chest Compression Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation" (Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Joseph P. Ornato, David P. Edwards et al., 2006), with 244 citations. Next come "What can PACT tell us about prescribing in general practice?" (109) and "Development and Outcomes of a Text Messaging Tobacco Cessation Intervention with Urban Adolescents" (98).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Use of an Automated, Load-Distributing Band Chest Compression Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Joseph P. Ornato, David P. Edwards et al. · JAMA 13 Jun 2006 244
2 What can PACT tell us about prescribing in general practice? Azeem Majeed, Neal Evans, Paula Head · BMJ Open access 6 Dec 1997 109
3 Development and Outcomes of a Text Messaging Tobacco Cessation Intervention with Urban Adolescents Michael J. Mason, Leah Floyd Campbell, Thomas C. Way et al. · Substance Abuse 31 Dec 2014 98
4 Recommended guidelines for reporting on emergency medical dispatch when conducting research in emergency medicine: The Utstein style Maaret Kaarina Castrén, Rolf Karlsten, Freddy Knudsen Lippert et al. · Resuscitation 21 Sep 2008 92
5 Comparison of Medical Priority Dispatch (MPD) and Criteria Based Dispatch (CBD) relating to cardiac arrest calls Camilla Hardeland, Theresa Mariero Olasveengen, Rob Lawrence et al. · Resuscitation 10 Feb 2014 57
All 67 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Richmond Behavioral Health Authority?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Public Health, Patient Satisfaction, Resuscitation, Quality Improvement, Health Care Utilization, Cardiac Arrest, Hypothermia and Disaster Response.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 32 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 32 words, with their numbers
  1. Public Health4▲ 8.7×8 topics
  2. Patient Satisfaction3▲ 36×3 topics
  3. Resuscitation3▲ 69×3 topics
  4. Quality Improvement2▲ 38×4 topics
  5. Health Care Utilization2▲ 58×3 topics
  6. Cardiac Arrest2▲ 128×1 topic
  7. Hypothermia2▲ 96×1 topic
  8. Disaster Response2▲ 92×2 topics
  9. Emergency Preparedness2▲ 174×1 topic
  10. Triage2▲ 174×1 topic
  11. Clinical Outcomes2▲ 30×3 topics
  12. Health Policy2▲ 38×2 topics
  13. Emergency Department Crowding2▲ 177×1 topic
  14. Triage Systems2▲ 177×1 topic
  15. Epidemiology2▲ 1.20×7 topics
  16. Mortality2▲ 10×2 topics
  17. Health Outcomes1▲ 20×2 topics
  18. Social Support1▲ 9.8×5 topics
  19. Healthcare1▲ 5.3×2 topics
  20. Injury Severity1▲ 54×1 topic
  21. Sustainability1▲ 2.2×3 topics
  22. Trauma Center1▲ 97×1 topic
  23. Primary Care1▲ 8.6×4 topics
  24. Clinical Governance1▲ 214×1 topic
  25. Electric Vehicles1▲ 20×1 topic
  26. Healthcare Accreditation1▲ 214×1 topic
  27. Maintenance1▲ 48×1 topic
  28. Medical Equipment1▲ 128×1 topic
  29. Qualitative Research1▲ 5.7×3 topics
  30. Quality of Life1▲ 2.4×3 topics
  31. Substance Use Disorders1▲ 49×2 topics
  32. Vehicle-to-Grid1▲ 97×1 topic

Which research topics does Richmond Behavioral Health Authority publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Health Policy Implementation Science, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Mental Health and Patient Involvement and Emergency and Acute Care Studies.

  1. 1 Health Policy Implementation Science General Health Professions 1 works
  2. 2 Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  3. 3 Mental Health and Patient Involvement General Health Professions 0 works
  4. 4 Emergency and Acute Care Studies Emergency Medicine 0 works
  5. 5 Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes General Health Professions 0 works
  6. 6 Child Nutrition and Water Access Nutrition and Dietetics 0 works
  7. 7 Global Health Workforce Issues Emergency Medical Services 0 works
  8. 8 Trauma and Emergency Care Studies Emergency Medicine 0 works
  9. 9 ECG Monitoring and Analysis Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 0 works
  10. 10 Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Emergency Medicine 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available18.4%not open81.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors20.3%domestic only79.7%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Richmond Behavioral Health Authority's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 3% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Richmond Behavioral Health Authority as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000045% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%0.00030%Richmond Behavioral Health Authority0.000020% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Richmond Behavioral Health Authority over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Richmond

All research institutions in Richmond

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Richmond Behavioral Health Authority. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.