Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Columbia · United States

Saving Sight

saving-sight.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
14
▼ 100% vs 2018-21
Citations
88
6.2 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.9%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
17%
world 40%
Saving Sight

Not ranked overall: Saving Sight is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Saving Sight work in?

In all years, 48% of research at Saving Sight is in Social Sciences, 34% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (44%), Medicine (22%), Neuroscience (11%). It does 1.6× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 7 fractional works · 48.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 6 fractional works · 44.3% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 15.4% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 2 fractional works · 13.0% of its workSafety Research: 1 fractional works · 7.1% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 3.8% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 5 fractional works · 33.6% of its workMedicine: 3 fractional works · 22.4% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 2 fractional works · 12.0% of its workOphthalmology: 1 fractional works · 5.4% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 11.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 6.5% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 3.5% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 15.9% of its workNeuroscience: 2 fractional works · 11.2% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 2 fractional works · 11.2% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workPhysical Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workALL ITS WORKSaving Sight14fractional works, all years
Life Sciences16%Physical Sciences2%Health Sciences34%Social Sciences48%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 8 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences644.3%
    2. Psychology13.8%
    1. Medicine322.4%
    2. Health Professions211.2%
    1. Neuroscience211.2%
    2. Agricultural and Biological Sciences02.3%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology02.3%
    1. Computer Science02.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

    What are the most cited papers from Saving Sight?

    The most cited paper from Saving Sight is "Impact of Adaptive Materials on Teachers and their Students with Visual Impairments in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classes" (Audrey C. Rule, Greg P. Stefanich, Robert M. Boody et al., 2010), with 90 citations. Next come "Guidelines for Making Simulation an Effective Adjunct to in Vivo Community Instruction" (55) and "Trends in Early Graft Failure Leading to Regrafting After Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States" (13).

    Most cited papers
    #PaperReleasedCitations
    1 Impact of Adaptive Materials on Teachers and their Students with Visual Impairments in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classes Audrey C. Rule, Greg P. Stefanich, Robert M. Boody et al. · International Journal of Science Education 20 Sep 2010 90
    2 Guidelines for Making Simulation an Effective Adjunct to in Vivo Community Instruction John A. Nietupski, Susan M. Hamre-Nietupski, Patrick Clancy et al. · Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities Mar 1986 55
    3 Trends in Early Graft Failure Leading to Regrafting After Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States Michael Joseph Fliotsos, Jack A. Campbell, Ximin Li et al. · Cornea Open access 5 Aug 2021 13
    4 Verbalism and Affective Meaning for Blind, Severely Visually Impaired, and Normally Sighted Children Richard M. DeMott · Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 1972 13
    5 The Iowa Model for Pediatric Low Vision Services Mark E. Wilkinson, Ian Nicholas Stewart, Carole S. Trantham · Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness Jul 2000 10
    All 21 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

    Which research topics does Saving Sight publish most on?

    By volume: Digital Accessibility for Disabilities, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, Corneal Surgery and Treatments and Disability Education and Employment.

    Digital Accessibility fo…2Digital Accessibility for Disabilities: 2 fractional worksTactile and Sensory Interactions: 1 fractional worksCorneal Surgery and Treatments: 1 fractional worksDisability Education and Employment: 1 fractional worksEducation and Technology Integration: 1 fractional worksOphthalmology and Visual…1Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies: 1 fractional worksCorneal surgery and disorders: 0 fractional worksSports and Physical Education Research: 0 fractional worksChild Development and Education: 0 fractional worksErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders: 0 fractional works
    Human Factors and ErgonomicsCognitive NeuroscienceRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingSafety Research4 others

    Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

    1. 1 Digital Accessibility for Disabilities Human Factors and Ergonomics 2 works
    2. 2 Tactile and Sensory Interactions Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
    3. 3 Corneal Surgery and Treatments Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1 works
    4. 4 Disability Education and Employment Safety Research 1 works
    5. 5 Education and Technology Integration Education 1 works
    6. 6 Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies Epidemiology 1 works
    7. 7 Corneal surgery and disorders Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
    8. 8 Sports and Physical Education Research Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 0 works
    9. 9 Child Development and Education Education 0 works
    10. 10 Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders Social Psychology 0 works

    How open and international is its research?

    Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

    openly available17.1%not open82.9%

    World: 40% of research is openly available.

    How has Saving Sight's research output changed?

    Output in 2022-2025 was 100% lower than in 2018-2021.

    1990200020102020
    grewheldshrank

    The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

    Its share of all research

    Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Saving Sight as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000041% in 2020.

    0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Saving Sight0.0000049% in 202119801990200020102020

    Fractional works of Saving Sight over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

    Other research institutions in Columbia

    All research institutions in Columbia

    Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

    Discussion

    Ask a question or share a note about Saving Sight. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.