Southwest Educational Development Center
- Research works
- 78 ▲ 82% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2.7k 34.1 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 11% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Southwest Educational Development Center is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 8.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Psychology 8.6×
- Decision Sciences 7.7×
- Health Professions 3.7×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Mathematics 1.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.4×
- Dentistry 1.3×
- Neuroscience 1.1×
- Computer Science 1.0×
- Nursing 0.9×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.5×
- Arts and Humanities 0.3×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Engineering 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Southwest Educational Development Center?
Ranked on the composite score, Ernst Bloch, Joe H. Ward and Karen Louise Møller lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Southwest Educational Development Center.
- 1 Ernst Bloch United States · #111,514 worldwide 38 citations · 50 works
- 2 Joe H. Ward United States · #143,218 worldwide 641 citations · 19 works
- 3 Karen Louise Møller United States · #1,526,787 worldwide 6 citations · 18 works
Which keywords describe research at Southwest Educational Development Center?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Technology Integration, Reflective Practice, Educational Technology, Education, Professional Learning Communities, Social Science, Teacher Professional Development and Embodiment.
- Instructional Design
- Student Satisfaction
- Professional Development
- Vocational Education
- Collaborative Learning
- Special Education
- Student Perceptions
- Theory-Based Evaluation
- Language Development
- Academic Achievement
- Student Engagement
- Higher Education
- Motivation
- Qualitative Research Methods
- Ethical Guidelines
- E-Learning
- Teacher Professional Development
- Social Science
- Reflective Practice
- Technology Integration
- Education
- Educational Technology
- Professional Learning Communities
- Embodiment
- Tacit Knowledge
- Educational Leadership
- Interactional Expertise
- Teacher Identity
- Pedagogy
- Self-Regulation
- Online Learning
- Concept Mapping
- Medical Education
- Metacognition
- Leadership
- Cognitive Apprenticeship
- Scaffolding
- Engineering Education
- Student Retention
- Training Pathways
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Education5▲ 5.0×14 topics
- Technology Integration5▲ 30×7 topics
- Educational Technology4▲ 8.4×9 topics
- Reflective Practice4▲ 32×5 topics
- Professional Learning Communities4▲ 111×2 topics
- Social Science4▲ 96×2 topics
- Embodiment4▲ 28×3 topics
- Teacher Professional Development4▲ 47×4 topics
- Tacit Knowledge4▲ 79×3 topics
- E-Learning4▲ 8.1×7 topics
- Educational Leadership4▲ 50×2 topics
- Ethical Guidelines4▲ 81×1 topic
- Interactional Expertise4▲ 266×1 topic
- Qualitative Research Methods3▲ 100×1 topic
- Teacher Identity3▲ 111×1 topic
- Motivation3▲ 14×4 topics
- Pedagogy3▲ 11×8 topics
- Higher Education3▲ 9.9×10 topics
- Self-Regulation3▲ 23×2 topics
- Student Engagement3▲ 15×7 topics
- Online Learning3▲ 8.3×6 topics
- Academic Achievement3▲ 24×4 topics
- Concept Mapping3▲ 66×1 topic
- Language Development3▲ 23×3 topics
- Medical Education3▲ 15×5 topics
- Theory-Based Evaluation3▲ 152×1 topic
- Metacognition3▲ 29×2 topics
- Student Perceptions3▲ 24×4 topics
- Leadership2▲ 9.4×8 topics
- Special Education2▲ 37×3 topics
- Cognitive Apprenticeship2▲ 60×1 topic
- Collaborative Learning2▲ 44×2 topics
- Scaffolding2▲ 60×1 topic
- Vocational Education2▲ 43×2 topics
- Engineering Education2▲ 28×5 topics
- Professional Development2▲ 17×4 topics
- Student Retention2▲ 64×1 topic
- Student Satisfaction2▲ 25×2 topics
- Training Pathways2▲ 76×1 topic
- Instructional Design2▲ 30×2 topics
Which research topics does Southwest Educational Development Center publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research, Evaluation and Performance Assessment, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research Social Psychology 3 works
- 2 Evaluation and Performance Assessment Management Science and Operations Research 1 works
- 3 Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods Developmental and Educational Psychology 1 works
- 4 Teacher Education and Leadership Studies Education 1 works
- 5 Social and Educational Sciences Education 1 works
- 6 Interprofessional Education and Collaboration General Health Professions 1 works
- 7 Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions General Health Professions 0 works
- 8 Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development Management of Technology and Innovation 0 works
- 9 Innovations in Medical Education Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
- 10 Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies Molecular Biology 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Southwest Educational Development Center's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 82% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Cedar City
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.