Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Architecture

Engineering Education and Pedagogy

Engineering Education and Pedagogy is a research topic within Architecture. Science Explorer counts 14k research works in it since 1950. 12.4% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on innovations in engineering education, curriculum development, and the integration of entrepreneurship, hands-on learning, and project-based experiences. It emphasizes assessment strategies, multidisciplinary approaches, and the cultivation of innovation, invention, teamwork, and leadership skills among engineering students.

  • Engineering Education
  • Curriculum Development
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Hands-On Learning
  • Integrated First-Year Curriculum
  • Project-Based Learning
  • Assessment Strategies
  • Multidisciplinary Experiences
  • Innovation and Invention
  • Teamwork and Leadership
Research works
14k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
12.4%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+230%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Engineering Education and Pedagogy research?

By volume, the United States and Canada publish the most (1.3k and 57 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 1.3k works
  2. 2 Canada 57 works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 36 works
  4. 4 India 33 works
  5. 5 Germany 27 works
  6. 6 Australia 26 works
  7. 7 Spain 24 works
  8. 8 Mexico 24 works
  9. 9 Indonesia 22 works
  10. 10 China 21 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 83.0%Canada: 3.6%United Kingdom: 2.3%India: 2.1%6 others listed: 9.0%83%largest
United States1,323 · 83.0%Canada57 · 3.6%United Kingdom36 · 2.3%India33 · 2.1%6 others listed144 · 9.0%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Engineering Education and Pedagogy research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Pennsylvania State University publishes the most Engineering Education and Pedagogy research, followed by Purdue University West Lafayette and Virginia Tech.

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Pennsylvania State University United States 35 works
  2. 2 Purdue University West Lafayette United States 31 works
  3. 3 Virginia Tech United States 23 works
  4. 4 The Ohio State University United States 18 works
  5. 5 North Carolina State University United States 15 works
  6. 6 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States 14 works
  7. 7 American Society For Engineering Education United States 14 works
  8. 8 Texas A&M University United States 14 works
  9. 9 Arizona State University United States 14 works
  10. 10 University of Michigan United States 13 works

Where is Engineering Education and Pedagogy research done?

The largest centres of Engineering Education and Pedagogy research in 2022–2025 are State College (United States), West Lafayette (United States), Washington D.C. (United States) and Blacksburg (United States).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 State College United States 35 works
  2. 2 West Lafayette United States 31 works
  3. 3 Washington D.C. United States 29 works
  4. 4 Blacksburg United States 23 works
  5. 5 Columbus United States 20 works
  6. 6 Boulder United States 18 works
  7. 7 Baltimore United States 18 works
  8. 8 Boston United States 18 works
  9. 9 Pittsburgh United States 16 works
  10. 10 New York United States 16 works
See Engineering Education and Pedagogy on the map

Where is the best place to study Engineering Education and Pedagogy?

Among universities, judged by research, Pennsylvania State University, Purdue University West Lafayette and The Ohio State University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 11.87%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Pennsylvania State University: 35, 13.5%Purdue University West Lafayette: 31, 6.0%The Ohio State University: 18, 11.4%Tecnológico de Monterrey: 10, 8.4%North Carolina State University: 15, 14.3%University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign: 14, 11.8%The University of Texas at Austin: 13, 17.6%Georgia Institute of Technology: 11, 14.5%University of Colorado Boulder: 9, 13.7%California Polytechnic State University: 9, 7.5%Pennsylvania State U…The Ohio State Unive…Tecnológico de Monte…Purdue University We…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1Pennsylvania State University United States 71.813.5%20.4×35 +62.8%
2Purdue University West Lafayette United States 62.06.0%18.2×31 +96.9%
3The Ohio State University United States 61.611.4%11.2×18 +108.4%
4Tecnológico de Monterrey Mexico 61.58.4%20.8×10 +190.5%
5North Carolina State University United States 60.414.3%15.1×15 +61.7%
6University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States 55.111.8%9.3×14 +60.5%
7The University of Texas at Austin United States 54.917.6%8.7×13 +34.8%
8Georgia Institute of Technology United States 53.114.5%10.2×11 -9.9%
9University of Colorado Boulder United States 51.813.7%13.3×9 +31.2%
10California Polytechnic State University United States 51.67.5%71.4×9 +186.3%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Engineering Education and Pedagogy research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 230% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2020. The fastest-growing topics are Engineering Education and Pedagogy.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.