United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command
In research, United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command stands highest in Physical Sciences (#1,686 of 12,888 worldwide), Engineering (#1,293 of 6,636 worldwide) and Computer Science (#1,521 of 4,667 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Aerospace Engineering and Computational Mechanics — Aerospace Engineering is 7.8× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #2,851 of 28,054 · #4,248 all time
- Rank in United States
- #414 of 4,192
- Research works
- 3k ▲ 199% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 40k 13.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 15.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 20% world 28%
What is United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #1,686 of 12,888 | 14.8% | 879 | #2661 | |
| EngineeringField | #1,293 of 6,636 | 16.0% | 445 | #1875 | |
| Computer ScienceField | #1,521 of 4,667 | 14.3% | 189 | #2967 | |
| Physics and AstronomyField | #831 of 1,646 | 14.7% | 60 | #1933 | |
| Electrical and Electronic EngineeringSubfield | #1,211 of 2,318 | 13.1% | 95 | #1706 | |
| Materials ScienceField | #1,512 of 2,468 | 12.4% | 97 | #2054 | |
| Aerospace EngineeringSubfield | #578 of 795 | 26.0% | 93 | #1036 | |
| Materials ChemistrySubfield | #1,307 of 1,556 | 13.6% | 61 | #2222 | |
| Artificial IntelligenceSubfield | #1,637 of 1,884 | 12.8% | 71 | — |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Which of those standings moved
The same fields on both windows: where it stood over the whole record, and where it stands in 2022–2025. The distance is the story, and it is the one thing the two rank columns above cannot show.
- Physical Sciences#2,661 #1,686
- Engineering#1,875 #1,293
- Computer Science#2,967 #1,521
- Physics and Astronomy#1,933 #831
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering#1,706 #1,211
- Materials Science#2,054 #1,512
- Aerospace Engineering#1,036 #578
- Materials Chemistry#2,222 #1,307
A dot further right is a better standing. Fields it was not ranked in over the whole record are left out.
What does United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Aerospace Engineering takes 7.8× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Aerospace EngineeringSubfield · 93.4 works7.8×
- Computational MechanicsSubfield · 38.2 works6.5×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Chemical Engineering, 4.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Chemical Engineering 4.6×
- Engineering 2.9×
- Materials Science 2.7×
- Physics and Astronomy 2.6×
- Computer Science 2.4×
- Decision Sciences 1.8×
- Chemistry 1.6×
- Neuroscience 1.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.8×
- Energy 0.7×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Veterinary 0.5×
- Mathematics 0.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.4×
- Environmental Science 0.4×
- Health Professions 0.3×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.3×
- Medicine 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Dentistry 0.1×
- Nursing 0.1×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0.1×
- Social Sciences 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
- Arts and Humanities 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command?
Ranked on the composite score, Gregory W. Peterson, D. E. Wortman and Andrew M. Wissink lead among researchers whose main affiliation is United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command.
- 1 Gregory W. Peterson United States · #64,080 worldwide 539 citations · 34 works
- 2 D. E. Wortman United States · #263,516 worldwide 131 citations · 39 works
- 3 Andrew M. Wissink United States · #720,469 worldwide 116 citations · 37 works
- 4 Lew Goldberg United States · #739,254 worldwide 35 citations · 25 works
- 5 M. A. Vincenti United States · #840,218 worldwide 156 citations · 73 works
- 6 Daniel Field United States · #879,579 worldwide 27 citations · 25 works
- 7 G. C. Vezzoli United States · #903,540 worldwide 53 citations · 29 works
- 8 D. K. Rohrbaugh United States · #1,058,962 worldwide 60 citations · 29 works
- 9 Roman G. Kuperman United States · #1,114,217 worldwide 28 citations · 18 works
- 10 S. Munavalli United States · #1,288,964 worldwide 43 citations · 25 works
Which keywords describe research at United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Deep Learning, Mechanical Properties, Machine Learning, Microstructure, Neural Networks, Chemical Kinetics, Heat Transfer and Autonomous Vehicles.
- Energetic Salts
- Constitutive Modeling
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations
- Sintering
- Grain Refinement
- Metal Nanoparticles
- Thermal Decomposition
- Combustion
- Polymer Composites
- Ionic Liquids
- Microstructural Evolution
- Cathode Materials
- Detection
- Multi-Agent Systems
- Graphene
- Autonomous Vehicles
- Chemical Kinetics
- Nanoparticles
- Neural Networks
- Machine Learning
- Deep Learning
- Mechanical Properties
- Microstructure
- Heat Transfer
- Nanocomposites
- Large-Eddy Simulation
- Biosensors
- Additive Manufacturing
- Thermal Management
- Emissions
- Combustion Instabilities
- Sparse Representation
- Biofuels
- Oxidation Mechanism
- Internal Combustion Engines
- Soot Formation
- Signal Processing
- Ballistic Impact
- Spark Plasma Sintering
- Radial Basis Functions
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Deep Learning86▲ 2.5×67 topics
- Machine Learning57▲ 1.70×61 topics
- Mechanical Properties42▲ 4.2×25 topics
- Neural Networks39▲ 2.5×28 topics
- Microstructure29▲ 5.5×14 topics
- Nanoparticles25▲ 1.96×31 topics
- Heat Transfer24▲ 4.7×12 topics
- Chemical Kinetics20▲ 22×2 topics
- Nanocomposites19▲ 2.3×18 topics
- Autonomous Vehicles19▲ 8.7×4 topics
- Large-Eddy Simulation18▲ 9.2×5 topics
- Graphene18▲ 2.5×11 topics
- Biosensors17▲ 3.2×12 topics
- Multi-Agent Systems16▲ 8.4×6 topics
- Additive Manufacturing16▲ 5.0×8 topics
- Detection16▲ 5.1×6 topics
- Thermal Management16▲ 4.6×7 topics
- Cathode Materials16▲ 3.9×3 topics
- Emissions16▲ 7.6×6 topics
- Microstructural Evolution15▲ 10×4 topics
- Combustion Instabilities15▲ 23×2 topics
- Ionic Liquids13▲ 4.6×10 topics
- Sparse Representation13▲ 6.7×6 topics
- Polymer Composites13▲ 4.8×7 topics
- Biofuels12▲ 13×2 topics
- Combustion12▲ 19×3 topics
- Oxidation Mechanism12▲ 15×2 topics
- Thermal Decomposition12▲ 26×2 topics
- Internal Combustion Engines12▲ 25×1 topic
- Metal Nanoparticles12▲ 6.9×5 topics
- Soot Formation12▲ 25×1 topic
- Grain Refinement12▲ 9.8×4 topics
- Signal Processing11▲ 7.9×6 topics
- Sintering11▲ 8.2×5 topics
- Ballistic Impact11▲ 17×2 topics
- Molecular Dynamics Simulations10▲ 23×2 topics
- Spark Plasma Sintering10▲ 9.4×2 topics
- Constitutive Modeling10▲ 14×2 topics
- Radial Basis Functions10▲ 13×2 topics
- Energetic Salts10▲ 39×1 topic
Which research topics does United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies, Energetic Materials and Combustion, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics and High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 12 works
- 2 Energetic Materials and Combustion Mechanics of Materials 10 works
- 3 Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics Computational Mechanics 9 works
- 4 High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior Materials Chemistry 8 works
- 5 Infrared Target Detection Methodologies Aerospace Engineering 8 works
- 6 Combustion and flame dynamics Computational Mechanics 8 works
- 7 Robotic Path Planning Algorithms Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 8 works
- 8 Aerospace and Aviation Technology Aerospace Engineering 8 works
- 9 Human-Automation Interaction and Safety Social Psychology 7 works
- 10 Advancements in Battery Materials Electrical and Electronic Engineering 7 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has United States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 199% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Aberdeen Proving Ground
- U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine
- CECOM Software Engineering Center
- U.S. Army Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Center
- United States Army Test and Evaluation Command
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.