Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung
In research, Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung stands highest in Physical Sciences (#17,626 of 21,541 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#14,526 of 16,945 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #29,869 of 42,892
- Rank in Germany
- #1,399 of 2,077
- Research works
- 381 ▲ 109% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2.9k 7.7 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 17.9% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 21% world 28%
What is Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #17,626 of 21,541 | 16.4% | 190 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #14,526 of 16,945 | 15.4% | 151 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 4.3×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 4.3×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 2.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.4×
- Social Sciences 2.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting 1.8×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 1.5×
- Decision Sciences 1.5×
- Mathematics 1.3×
- Energy 1.0×
- Environmental Science 0.9×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.8×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.7×
- Psychology 0.6×
- Medicine 0.6×
- Engineering 0.5×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
Who are the top researchers at Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung?
Ranked on the composite score, Wolfgang Hübner lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung.
- 1 Wolfgang Hübner Germany · #785,059 worldwide 33 citations · 49 works
Which keywords describe research at Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Diplomacy, Early Modern, Informed Consent, Medical Ethics, Literature, Investment Decisions, Patient Rights and Reproductive Medicine.
- Value Chains
- Scholastic Thought
- Legal Methodology
- Identity
- Economic Ethics
- Human Rights
- Corporate Governance
- Reproductive Medicine
- Investment Decisions
- Medical Ethics
- Early Modern
- Diplomacy
- Informed Consent
- Literature
- Patient Rights
- Sustainable Development
- Legal History
- Sustainability
- Financialization
- Information Technology
- Party Competition
- Shareholder Value
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 22 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 22 words, with their numbers
- Diplomacy2▲ 69×1 topic
- Early Modern2▲ 555×1 topic
- Informed Consent2▲ 69×2 topics
- Medical Ethics2▲ 39×2 topics
- Literature2▲ 9.0×2 topics
- Investment Decisions2▲ 34×2 topics
- Patient Rights2▲ 57×1 topic
- Reproductive Medicine2▲ 303×1 topic
- Sustainable Development2▲ 2.7×4 topics
- Corporate Governance1▲ 5.1×2 topics
- Legal History1▲ 136×2 topics
- Human Rights1▲ 3.4×2 topics
- Sustainability1▲ 1.45×5 topics
- Economic Ethics1▲ 807×1 topic
- Financialization1▲ 28×1 topic
- Identity1▲ 3.9×2 topics
- Information Technology1▲ 5.8×1 topic
- Legal Methodology1▲ 153×1 topic
- Party Competition1▲ 240×1 topic
- Scholastic Thought1▲ 807×1 topic
- Shareholder Value1▲ 26×1 topic
- Value Chains1▲ 153×1 topic
Which research topics does Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Historical Influence and Diplomacy, Medical and Health Sciences Research, Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism and Law and Political Science.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Historical Influence and Diplomacy Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 2 Medical and Health Sciences Research Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2 works
- 3 Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism Finance 1 works
- 4 Law and Political Science Law 1 works
- 5 Corporate Governance and Management Strategy and Management 1 works
- 6 Libraries and Information Services Museology 1 works
- 7 Historical Economic and Legal Thought Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 8 Memory, History, Trauma, Identity Philosophy 1 works
- 9 German legal, social, and political studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 10 Religion, Theology, and Education Religious studies 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Zentrum für Foren in der Grafischen Datenverarbeitung's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 109% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Darmstadt
- Technische Universität Darmstadt
- Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences
- GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research
- Merck KGaA, Darmstadt (Germany)
- Fraunhofer Institute for Computer Graphics Research
- Software (Germany)
- Institut für das Bauen mit Kunststoffen
- Institut für biologische Forschung
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.