Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Researcher · Bedford Research Foundation · United States

John Foulkes

John Foulkes publishes mostly in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Literature and Literary Theory and Surgery, on topics such as Innovations in Medical Education, Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills and Medical Education and Admissions.

OpenAlex
World rank
#5,181,879
of 7,710,434 ranked researchers
Rank in United States
#1,331,407
of 1,627,098
Works
22
Citations
216
Citations per work
9.8
h-index
8
i10-index 7Top 66% in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
John Foulkes

What does John Foulkes research?

John Foulkes's work is mostly in Medicine (44%), Arts and Humanities (13%), Social Sciences (6%).

Health Sciences: 10 works · 43.7% of their workMedicine: 10 works · 43.7% of their workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 4 works · 20.0% of their workSurgery: 2 works · 10.9% of their workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 2 works · 7.3% of their workFamily Practice: 1 works · 5.5% of their workEverything else: 8 works · 38.1% of their workSocial Sciences: 4 works · 18.2% of their workArts and Humanities: 3 works · 12.7% of their workLiterature and Literary Theory: 3 works · 12.7% of their workSocial Sciences: 1 works · 5.5% of their workEducation: 1 works · 5.5% of their workTHEIR WORKJohn Foulkes22works
Health Sciences44%Social Sciences18%

Their six largest subfields, inside their fields and domains; the grey slice is everything else they publish. The interactive view splits every one of their works down to single topics.

The fields and subfields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine1043.7%
  2. Everything else838.1%
    1. Arts and Humanities312.7%
    2. Social Sciences15.5%
  1. 1Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health20% of their works
  2. 2Literature and Literary Theory13% of their works
  3. 3Surgery11% of their works
  4. 4Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine7% of their works
  5. 5Family Practice6% of their works
  6. 6Education6% of their works

Research topics

Which keywords describe John Foulkes's research?

The keywords of their largest research topics: Reflective Practice, Competency-Based Education, Professional Identity Formation, Clinical Reasoning, Diagnostic Error, Medical School Selection, Predictive Validity and Surgical Skills.

Size is their works in the topics tagged with each word, from their 8 largest topics. Each links to the topic it comes from most. The words come from the keyword list OpenAlex gives each topic, not from the text of the papers, so a word can appear that none of the papers uses.

All 17 words, with their numbers
  1. Reflective Practice102 topics
  2. Competency-Based Education71 topic
  3. Professional Identity Formation71 topic
  4. Clinical Reasoning31 topic
  5. Diagnostic Error31 topic
  6. Medical School Selection31 topic
  7. Predictive Validity31 topic
  8. Surgical Skills31 topic
  9. Virtual Reality Training31 topic
  10. Baudelaire21 topic
  11. Cardiac Risk21 topic
  12. Educational Assessment21 topic
  13. French Literature21 topic
  14. Fuzzy Logic21 topic
  15. Perioperative21 topic
  16. Radiology Errors21 topic
  17. Structured Reporting21 topic

Where does John Foulkes work?

John Foulkes's main affiliation in the publication record is Bedford Research Foundation, United States.

How many publications and citations does John Foulkes have?

OpenAlex counts 22 works and 216 citations for John Foulkes, an h-index of 8, ranking #5,181,879 of 7,710,434 researchers worldwide on the quality score.

Ranked on field-normalised citation excellence (50%), output (30%) and citations (20%). Counts come from OpenAlex author records, which occasionally merge different people who share a name or split one person into several.

Papers, co-authors, who cited this work and researchers on the nearest topics have tabs of their own, above. Is this your page? Claim it with your ORCID iD, or request a correction or removal.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about John Foulkes. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.