Wojtek Wiercioch
Wojtek Wiercioch publishes mostly in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Internal Medicine, on topics such as Clinical practice guidelines implementation, Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management and Health Policy Implementation Science.
- World rank
- #27,208 of 7,710,434 ranked researchers
- Rank in Canada
- #653 of 183,316
- Works
- 124
- Citations
- 14k
- Citations per work
- 112.8
What does Wojtek Wiercioch research?
Wojtek Wiercioch's work is mostly in Medicine (35%), Health Professions (13%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (8%).
Their six largest subfields, inside their fields and domains; the grey slice is everything else they publish. The interactive view splits every one of their works down to single topics.
The fields and subfields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences5947.5%
- Medicine4334.8%
- Health Professions1612.7%
- Everything else4737.8%
- Social Sciences1814.7%
- 1Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health16% of their works
- 2General Health Professions13% of their works
- 3Internal Medicine12% of their works
- 4Economics and Econometrics8% of their works
- 5Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty7% of their works
- 6Surgery7% of their works
Research topics
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
- COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Which keywords describe Wojtek Wiercioch's research?
The keywords of their largest research topics: Quality Assessment, Diagnosis, Clinical Guidelines, Guideline Development, Antithrombotic Therapy, Venous Thromboembolism, Implementation Science and Qualitative Research.
- Atrial Fibrillation
- SARS-CoV-2
- Vaccination
- Thrombosis
- PRISMA Statement
- Quality of Life
- Qualitative Research
- Venous Thromboembolism
- Guideline Development
- Diagnosis
- Quality Assessment
- Clinical Guidelines
- Antithrombotic Therapy
- Implementation Science
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis
- Meta-Analysis
- Immune Response
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
- Clinical Characteristics
- Anticoagulant Therapy
Size is their works in the topics tagged with each word, from their 8 largest topics. Each links to the topic it comes from most. The words come from the keyword list OpenAlex gives each topic, not from the text of the papers, so a word can appear that none of the papers uses.
All 20 words, with their numbers
- Quality Assessment732 topics
- Diagnosis522 topics
- Clinical Guidelines501 topic
- Guideline Development501 topic
- Antithrombotic Therapy421 topic
- Venous Thromboembolism421 topic
- Implementation Science311 topic
- Qualitative Research311 topic
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis251 topic
- Quality of Life251 topic
- Meta-Analysis231 topic
- PRISMA Statement231 topic
- Immune Response192 topics
- Thrombosis192 topics
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia101 topic
- Vaccination101 topic
- Clinical Characteristics91 topic
- SARS-CoV-291 topic
- Anticoagulant Therapy81 topic
- Atrial Fibrillation81 topic
Where does Wojtek Wiercioch work?
Wojtek Wiercioch's main affiliation in the publication record is McMaster University, Canada.
How many publications and citations does Wojtek Wiercioch have?
OpenAlex counts 124 works and 13,989 citations for Wojtek Wiercioch, an h-index of 42, ranking #27,208 of 7,710,434 researchers worldwide on the quality score.
Ranked on field-normalised citation excellence (50%), output (30%) and citations (20%). Counts come from OpenAlex author records, which occasionally merge different people who share a name or split one person into several.
Papers, co-authors, who cited this work and researchers on the nearest topics have tabs of their own, above. Is this your page? Claim it with your ORCID iD, or request a correction or removal.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Wojtek Wiercioch. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.