Science Explorer Interactive view Map

3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications

3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications is a research topic within Building and Construction. Science Explorer counts 15k research works in it since 1950. 13.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the applications and integration of 3D city models, including topics such as CityGML, BIM-GIS integration, indoor navigation, cadastral systems, urban development, spatial data management, energy simulation, building information modeling, and land administration.

  • CityGML
  • BIM-GIS Integration
  • Indoor Navigation
  • Cadastral Systems
  • Urban Development
  • Spatial Data Management
  • Energy Simulation
  • Building Information Modeling
  • Geospatial Environments
  • Land Administration
Research works
15k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2k
per year above
Top-10% rate
13.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+13%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (432 and 237 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 432 works
  2. 2 United States 237 works
  3. 3 Germany 185 works
  4. 4 Indonesia 169 works
  5. 5 Russia 162 works
  6. 6 Italy 113 works
  7. 7 Poland 105 works
  8. 8 India 95 works
  9. 9 Japan 85 works
  10. 10 United Kingdom 74 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 26.1%United States: 14.3%Germany: 11.2%Indonesia: 10.2%6 others listed: 38.2%26%largest
China432 · 26.1%United States237 · 14.3%Germany185 · 11.2%Indonesia169 · 10.2%6 others listed634 · 38.2%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Technology Malaysia publishes the most 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications research, followed by Delft University of Technology and Technical University of Munich.

Who are the leading researchers in 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications?

The most-cited researchers publishing on 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications include Luc Van Gool.

  1. 1 Luc Van Gool Switzerland 8.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications research done?

The largest centres of 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Moscow (Russia), Nanjing (China) and Wuhan (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Johor Bahru and Delft.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 98 works
  2. 2 Moscow Russia 51 works
  3. 3 Nanjing China 40 works
  4. 4 Wuhan China 37 works
  5. 5 Tokyo Japan 34 works
  6. 6 Warsaw Poland 28 works
  7. 7 Johor Bahru Malaysia 25 works
  8. 8 Munich Germany 25 works
  9. 9 Kyiv Ukraine 23 works
  10. 10 Delft Netherlands 23 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. Johor BahruMY · 25.2 works18×
  2. DelftNL · 22.6 works11×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications than the world average.

See 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications on the map

Where is the best place to study 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications?

Among universities, judged by research, Delft University of Technology, Technical University of Munich and Czech Technical University in Prague score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 14.8%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Delft University of Technology: 22, 18.0%Technical University of Munich: 16, 23.4%Czech Technical University in Prague: 14, 13.8%University of Technology Malaysia: 25, 6.4%Politecnico di Milano: 10, 28.6%Warsaw University of Technology: 11, 13.6%University of Twente: 8, 12.2%Moscow State University of Civil Engineering: 11, 4.6%RWTH Aachen University: 10, 18.2%Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture: 11, 9.2%Technical University…Delft University of …Czech Technical Univ…University of Techno…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Delft University of TechnologyNetherlands 79.618.0%11.9×22 +104.1%
2 Technical University of MunichGermany 67.423.4%7.6×16 +44.6%
3 Czech Technical University in PragueCzechia 65.513.8%21.9×14 +125.8%
4 University of Technology MalaysiaMalaysia 64.46.4%19.4×25 +36.3%
5 Politecnico di MilanoItaly 59.928.6%5.3×10 +129.8%
6 Warsaw University of TechnologyPoland 54.913.6%15.8×11 +63.7%
7 University of TwenteNetherlands 52.112.2%10.0×8 +38.1%
8 Moscow State University of Civil EngineeringRussia 49.04.6%28.7×11 +189.6%
9 RWTH Aachen UniversityGermany 48.818.2%5.3×10 +141.1%
10 Beijing University of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureChina 46.49.2%27.9×11

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 13% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2024. The fastest-growing topics are 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.