Question 1

Which countries lead Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment research?

Accepted Answer

By volume, the United States and China publish the most (748 and 661 works in 2022-now).

Question 2

Which institutions lead Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment research?

Accepted Answer

By volume in 2022-now, National Institutes of Health publishes the most Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment research, followed by Russian Academy of Sciences and Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres.

Question 3

Who are the leading researchers in Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment?

Accepted Answer

The most-cited researchers publishing on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment include Ahmedin Jemal, Freddie Bray and George Davey Smith.

Question 4

Where is Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment research done?

Accepted Answer

The largest centres of Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment research in 2022-now are Beijing (China), Tokyo (Japan), Guangzhou (China) and Seoul (South Korea). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Karlsruhe and Durham.

Question 5

Where is the best place to study Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment?

Accepted Answer

Among universities, judged by research, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Harvard University and Shanghai Jiao Tong University score highest, combining citation excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

Question 6

Is Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment research growing?

Accepted Answer

Output in 2022-2025 was 7% lower than in 2018-2021, peaking in 2014.

Question 7

What are the most cited papers in Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment?

Accepted Answer

The most cited paper in Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment is "Short-Term Effects of Nose-Only Cigarette Smoke Exposure on Glutathione Redox Homeostasis, Cytochrome P450 1A1/2 and Respiratory Enzyme Activities in Mice Tissues" (Haider Raza, Annie John, Abderrahim Nemmar, 2013), with 47,289 citations. Next come "A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells" (20,633) and "A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells" (10,851).