Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Fire dynamics and safety research

Fire dynamics and safety research is a research topic within Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Science Explorer counts 25k research works in it since 1950. 27.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the safety measures and strategies for controlling and mitigating fires in tunnels. It covers topics such as smoke control, ventilation systems, fire dynamics, combustion modeling, heat release rates, smoke temperature, fire suppression, buoyancy-driven flow, and fire behavior.

  • Tunnel Fires
  • Smoke Control
  • Ventilation Systems
  • Fire Dynamics
  • Combustion Modeling
  • Heat Release Rates
  • Smoke Temperature
  • Fire Suppression
  • Buoyancy-Driven Flow
  • Fire Behavior
Research works
25k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
27.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+43%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Fire dynamics and safety research research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (2.5k and 596 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 2.5k works
  2. 2 United States 596 works
  3. 3 India 204 works
  4. 4 France 177 works
  5. 5 Russia 174 works
  6. 6 South Korea 164 works
  7. 7 United Kingdom 146 works
  8. 8 Germany 129 works
  9. 9 Japan 124 works
  10. 10 Australia 103 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 57.6%United States: 13.9%India: 4.8%France: 4.1%6 others listed: 19.6%58%largest
China2,466 · 57.6%United States596 · 13.9%India204 · 4.8%France177 · 4.1%6 others listed840 · 19.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Fire dynamics and safety research research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Science and Technology of China publishes the most Fire dynamics and safety research research, followed by China University of Mining and Technology and Nanjing Tech University.

Who are the leading researchers in Fire dynamics and safety research?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Fire dynamics and safety research include Kai Wang, Kefa Cen and K.M. Liew.

  1. 1 Kai Wang China 3.1k citations
  2. 2 Kefa Cen China 2.1k citations
  3. 3 K.M. Liew Hong Kong 2.1k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Fire dynamics and safety research research done?

The largest centres of Fire dynamics and safety research research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Nanjing (China), Hefei (China) and Xi'an (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Cherkasy, Xuzhou and Jiaozuo.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 415 works
  2. 2 Nanjing China 187 works
  3. 3 Hefei China 182 works
  4. 4 Xi'an China 152 works
  5. 5 Shanghai China 135 works
  6. 6 Xuzhou China 112 works
  7. 7 Wuhan China 111 works
  8. 8 Chengdu China 102 works
  9. 9 Chongqing China 83 works
  10. 10 Qingdao China 79 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. CherkasyUA · 23.3 works36×
  2. XuzhouCN · 111.7 works23×
  3. JiaozuoCN · 25.7 works15×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Fire dynamics and safety research than the world average.

See Fire dynamics and safety research on the map

Where is the best place to study Fire dynamics and safety research?

Among universities, judged by research, Dalian University, Shandong University of Science and Technology and China University of Mining and Technology score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%50%100%mean 49.04%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Dalian University: 22, 76.3%Shandong University of Science and Technology: 22, 53.3%China University of Mining and Technology: 109, 36.9%Chongqing University: 35, 56.9%Xi'an University of Science and Technology: 50, 48.0%University of Science and Technology of China: 137, 30.9%Nanjing Tech University: 68, 39.1%Nanjing University of Science and Technology: 43, 51.9%Hefei University of Technology: 25, 40.5%Changzhou University: 26, 56.6%Dalian UniversityChongqing UniversityShandong University …China University of …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Dalian UniversityChina 78.376.3%17.0×22 +309.5%
2 Shandong University of Science and TechnologyChina 65.553.3%8.6×22 +570.6%
3 China University of Mining and TechnologyChina 65.236.9%25.8×109 +51.3%
4 Chongqing UniversityChina 63.556.9%6.0×35 +207.3%
5 Xi'an University of Science and TechnologyChina 63.248.0%40.6×50 +45.9%
6 University of Science and Technology of ChinaChina 62.830.9%21.4×137 +9.6%
7 Nanjing Tech UniversityChina 62.839.1%25.8×68 +48.0%
8 Nanjing University of Science and TechnologyChina 62.051.9%9.7×43 +25.0%
9 Hefei University of TechnologyChina 61.240.5%8.5×25 +1838.1%
10 Changzhou UniversityChina 60.456.6%18.8×26 +14.1%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Fire dynamics and safety research research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 43% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Fire dynamics and safety research.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.