Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Paleontology

Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils is a research topic within Paleontology. Science Explorer counts 45k research works in it since 1950. 26.8% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the use of trace metals, isotopes, and biogeochemical indicators to reconstruct paleoredox conditions and paleoproductivity in ancient oceans. It explores topics such as oceanic anoxic events, atmospheric oxygenation, biogeochemical cycling, and their implications for Phanerozoic climate and mass extinctions.

  • Paleoredox
  • Paleoproductivity
  • Trace Metals
  • Oceanic Anoxic Events
  • Atmospheric Oxygenation
  • Biogeochemical Cycling
  • Isotope Geochemistry
  • Marine Sediments
  • Phanerozoic Climate
  • Mass Extinctions
Research works
45k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
12k
per year above
Top-10% rate
26.8%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+16%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (1.3k and 959 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 1.3k works
  2. 2 United States 959 works
  3. 3 France 329 works
  4. 4 Russia 327 works
  5. 5 United Kingdom 324 works
  6. 6 Germany 302 works
  7. 7 Brazil 235 works
  8. 8 Canada 197 works
  9. 9 Spain 168 works
  10. 10 Japan 141 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 30.7%United States: 22.3%France: 7.6%Russia: 7.6%6 others listed: 31.8%31%largest
China1,320 · 30.7%United States959 · 22.3%France329 · 7.6%Russia327 · 7.6%6 others listed1,366 · 31.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Chinese Academy of Sciences publishes the most Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils research, followed by China University of Geosciences and China University of Geosciences (Beijing).

Who are the leading researchers in Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils include S. Sarkar, Brian F. Windley and M. Santosh.

  1. 1 S. Sarkar United States 5.2k citations
  2. 2 Brian F. Windley United Kingdom 3.9k citations
  3. 3 M. Santosh China 3.8k citations
  4. 4 Simon A. Wilde Australia 3k citations
  5. 5 Guochun Zhao Hong Kong 2.9k citations
  6. 6 Hai Cheng China 2.9k citations
  7. 7 William L. Griffin Australia 2.8k citations
  8. 8 Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté Netherlands 2.4k citations
  9. 9 Martin J. Whitehouse Sweden 2.4k citations
  10. 10 Alfred Kröner Germany 2.3k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils research done?

The largest centres of Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Moscow (Russia), Paris (France) and Nanjing (China).

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 556 works
  2. 2 Moscow Russia 175 works
  3. 3 Paris France 126 works
  4. 4 Nanjing China 110 works
  5. 5 Chengdu China 108 works
  6. 6 Wuhan China 85 works
  7. 7 London United Kingdom 72 works
  8. 8 Qingdao China 63 works
  9. 9 Buenos Aires Argentina 55 works
  10. 10 Madrid Spain 53 works
See Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils on the map

Where is the best place to study Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils?

Among universities, judged by research, China University of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing and China University of Geosciences (Beijing) score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%mean 41.39%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →China University of Geosciences: 78, 45.1%China University of Petroleum, Beijing: 28, 28.3%China University of Geosciences (Beijing): 67, 30.6%Southwest Petroleum University: 25, 31.4%Memorial University of Newfoundland: 14, 46.7%Nanjing University: 38, 44.6%Chengdu University of Technology: 39, 39.8%Northwest University: 26, 37.0%University of California, Riverside: 13, 59.1%University of Leeds: 19, 51.3%China University of …Southwest Petroleum …China University of …China University of …
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 China University of GeosciencesChina 70.545.1%29.3×78 +11.1%
2 China University of Petroleum, BeijingChina 62.128.3%12.1×28 +163.9%
3 China University of Geosciences (Beijing)China 61.130.6%39.4×67 +6.1%
4 Southwest Petroleum UniversityChina 60.831.4%13.4×25 +133.1%
5 Memorial University of NewfoundlandCanada 60.546.7%12.1×14 +22.1%
6 Nanjing UniversityChina 59.744.6%8.4×38 +5.4%
7 Chengdu University of TechnologyChina 57.839.8%23.4×39 -45.6%
8 Northwest UniversityChina 57.037.0%15.6×26 +10.1%
9 University of California, RiversideUnited States 56.759.1%7.7×13 +0.6%
10 University of LeedsUnited Kingdom 56.051.3%6.2×19 +37.1%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 16% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2026. The fastest-growing topics are Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.