Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Topic · Paleontology

Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography

Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography is a research topic within Paleontology. Science Explorer counts 9k research works in it since 1950. 14.1% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the biogeographic regionalization of the Neotropical and Mexican regions, emphasizing the analysis of endemism, cladistics, and phylogenetics. It explores the distribution patterns of various taxa, including dung beetles, and delves into the concept of biotic elements. The papers also discuss the use of panbiogeography and the identification of areas of endemism.

  • Biogeography
  • Regionalization
  • Endemism
  • Cladistic Analysis
  • Neotropical Region
  • Mexican Transition Zone
  • Dung Beetles
  • Phylogenetic Analysis
  • Panbiogeography
  • Biotic Elements
Research works
9k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
1.3k
per year above
Top-10% rate
14.1%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+11%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography research?

By volume, Mexico and Colombia publish the most (301 and 201 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Mexico 301 works
  2. 2 Colombia 201 works
  3. 3 United States 134 works
  4. 4 China 131 works
  5. 5 Brazil 121 works
  6. 6 Russia 76 works
  7. 7 Germany 48 works
  8. 8 India 45 works
  9. 9 Argentina 44 works
  10. 10 Ecuador 37 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

Mexico: 26.5%Colombia: 17.7%United States: 11.8%China: 11.6%6 others listed: 32.5%26%largest
Mexico301 · 26.5%Colombia201 · 17.7%United States134 · 11.8%China131 · 11.6%6 others listed370 · 32.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Universidad de Ibagué publishes the most Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography research, followed by Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and Instituto de Ecología.

Who are the leading researchers in Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography include A. Townsend Peterson.

  1. 1 A. Townsend Peterson United States 2.1k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography research done?

The largest centres of Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography research in 2022–2025 are Ibagué (Colombia), Mexico City (Mexico), Xalapa (Mexico) and Bogotá (Colombia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Ibagué and Xalapa.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Ibagué Colombia 126 works
  2. 2 Mexico City Mexico 82 works
  3. 3 Xalapa Mexico 46 works
  4. 4 Bogotá Colombia 39 works
  5. 5 Beijing China 30 works
  6. 6 São Paulo Brazil 19 works
  7. 7 Guadalajara Mexico 16 works
  8. 8 Moscow Russia 16 works
  9. 9 Buenos Aires Argentina 15 works
  10. 10 Madrid Spain 15 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. IbaguéCO · 126.1 works693×
  2. XalapaMX · 45.8 works85×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography than the world average.

See Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography on the map

Where is the best place to study Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography?

Among universities, judged by research, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, National Research Tomsk State University and Altai State University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%mean 16.36%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso: 12, 33.1%National Research Tomsk State University: 8, 36.6%Altai State University: 10, 35.1%Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 55, 12.0%Universidad de Ibagué: 124, 0.0%Universidad Nacional de Colombia: 18, 13.0%Hebei University: 10, 12.6%Daugavpils University: 8, 6.5%Universidad de Guadalajara: 16, 9.4%Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León: 14, 5.3%National Research To…Altai State UniversityUniversidade Federal…Universidad Nacional…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 Universidade Federal de Mato GrossoBrazil 71.333.1%41.5×12 +203.4%
2 National Research Tomsk State UniversityRussia 64.536.6%28.8×8
3 Altai State UniversityRussia 63.035.1%98.4×10
4 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico 52.412.0%36.8×55 -27.3%
5 Universidad de IbaguéColombia 51.00.0%922.9×124
6 Universidad Nacional de ColombiaColombia 44.813.0%32.3×18 -34.7%
7 Hebei UniversityChina 42.312.6%27.2×10 +37.3%
8 Daugavpils UniversityLatvia 41.36.5%256.7×8 +63.6%
9 Universidad de GuadalajaraMexico 40.39.4%33.6×16 -25.5%
10 Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo LeónMexico 39.95.3%42.8×14 +35.1%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 11% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.