Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies

Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies is a research topic within Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Science Explorer counts 26k research works in it since 1950. 21.0% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the application of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in oncology and microbiology. It covers topics such as cancer treatment, photosensitizers, singlet oxygen, antimicrobial PDT, nanoparticles, tumor imaging, cell death pathways, and reactive oxygen species. The papers discuss the mechanisms, clinical applications, and future directions of PDT in treating cancer and localized infections.

  • Photodynamic Therapy
  • Cancer Treatment
  • Photosensitizers
  • Singlet Oxygen
  • Antimicrobial
  • Nanoparticles
  • Tumor Imaging
  • Cell Death Pathways
  • Reactive Oxygen Species
  • Clinical Applications
Research works
26k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
5.5k
per year above
Top-10% rate
21.0%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+18%
the tick is no change

This ranks research output and citation impact. It says nothing about the quality of diagnosis, treatment or care.

Which countries lead Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies research?

By volume, China and the United States publish the most (1.6k and 524 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 1.6k works
  2. 2 United States 524 works
  3. 3 Russia 243 works
  4. 4 Japan 225 works
  5. 5 India 220 works
  6. 6 Brazil 214 works
  7. 7 South Korea 133 works
  8. 8 Türkiye 119 works
  9. 9 Germany 114 works
  10. 10 Poland 112 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 46.1%United States: 14.8%Russia: 6.9%Japan: 6.4%6 others listed: 25.8%46%largest
China1,630 · 46.1%United States524 · 14.8%Russia243 · 6.9%Japan225 · 6.4%6 others listed913 · 25.8%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies research?

By volume in 2022–2025, University of Johannesburg publishes the most Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies research, followed by Universidade de São Paulo and Sichuan University.

Who are the leading researchers in Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies include Ben Zhong Tang, Wei Huang and Zhuang Liu.

  1. 1 Ben Zhong Tang Hong Kong 7k citations
  2. 2 Wei Huang China 5.5k citations
  3. 3 Zhuang Liu China 3.6k citations
  4. 4 Jacky W. Y. Lam Hong Kong 3.4k citations
  5. 5 Kai Wang China 3.1k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies research done?

The largest centres of Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Shanghai (China), Guangzhou (China) and Moscow (Russia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Ivanovo.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 190 works
  2. 2 Shanghai China 149 works
  3. 3 Guangzhou China 118 works
  4. 4 Moscow Russia 116 works
  5. 5 Nanjing China 97 works
  6. 6 São Paulo Brazil 77 works
  7. 7 Wuhan China 63 works
  8. 8 Chengdu China 62 works
  9. 9 Seoul South Korea 58 works
  10. 10 Tokyo Japan 58 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. IvanovoRU · 27.6 works62×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies than the world average.

See Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies on the map

Where is the best place to study Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Johannesburg, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Southern Medical University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%25%50%75%mean 37.98%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Johannesburg: 36, 29.5%Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen: 10, 63.9%Southern Medical University: 21, 31.7%Medical University of Silesia: 14, 40.4%Tehran University of Medical Sciences: 18, 24.5%Dalian University: 12, 43.7%University of Rzeszów: 16, 32.2%China Pharmaceutical University: 12, 38.3%Sichuan University: 25, 34.0%Shenzhen University: 16, 41.6%Chinese University o…Medical University o…Southern Medical Uni…University of Johann…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of JohannesburgSouth Africa 78.229.5%12.4×36 +248.7%
2 Chinese University of Hong Kong, ShenzhenChina 71.063.9%11.4×10
3 Southern Medical UniversityChina 65.331.7%12.8×21 +146.8%
4 Medical University of SilesiaPoland 61.040.4%17.0×14 +95.5%
5 Tehran University of Medical SciencesIran 59.324.5%8.3×18 +375.5%
6 Dalian UniversityChina 59.243.7%10.5×12 +83.1%
7 University of RzeszówPoland 55.932.2%21.8×16
8 China Pharmaceutical UniversityChina 55.238.3%12.9×12 +51.5%
9 Sichuan UniversityChina 49.834.0%3.2×25 +161.6%
10 Shenzhen UniversityChina 48.541.6%4.8×16

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 18% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.