Aalborg University vs Linköping University
On research quality in 2022-now, Linköping University ranks #334 in the world and Aalborg University #394, of 22,385 institutions. Aalborg University stands higher in 3 of the 15 fields both publish in, Linköping University in 12.
Research profiles alike: 0.64similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Compare other institutions
Aalborg University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #394
- #464 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 13k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 11.2%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 42%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Energy Engineering and Power Technology, Architecture.
Linköping University
- World rank, 2022-now
- #334
- #384 all time
- Works, 2022-now
- 6.5k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 13.4%
- share of its work among the world's most cited
- Open access
- 47%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Public Administration, Applied Psychology, Toxicology.
Who leads, measure by measure?
Linköping University leads on 6 of 8 measures: research quality, citation excellence for its fields, top-10% rate, citations per work, open access and growth. Aalborg University leads on 2 of 8 measures: output and international co-authorship.
- #394Research qualityworld rank of 22,385 institutions, 2022-now#334
- 1.07×Citation excellence for its fieldsits top-10% rate against what its topics predict; 1.00× is as expected1.20×
- 13kOutputfractional works, 2022-now6.5k
- 11.2%Top-10% rateshare of its works among the world's most cited13.4%
- 17.8Citations per workall time, per fractional work30.3
- 42%Open accessof its works free to read, all time47%
- 27%Internationalof its works written with co-authors abroad, all time25%
- -14%Growthworks in 2022-25 against 2018-21; half a bar is no change+3%
A rank is drawn as its standing: the longer the bar, the nearer the top. Anything else is drawn against the larger of the two, and two values a hair apart are called level. Quality, citation excellence and the top-10% rate are explained in the methodology.
Who leads in each field?
Aalborg University stands higher in 3 of 15 fields, Linköping University in 12. Linköping University leads most in Business, Management and Accounting (#172 against #533); Aalborg University leads most in Environmental Science (#519 against #626). Each bar is that side's standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #1,014Agricultural and Biological Sciences#774
- #623Arts and Humanities#384
- #763Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#663
- #533Business, Management and Accounting#172
- #560Computer Science#423
- #475Economics, Econometrics and Finance#271
- #47Energy-
- #220Engineering#346
- #519Environmental Science#626
- #374Health Professions#261
- -Materials Science#167
- #348Medicine#337
- -Neuroscience#315
- #450Psychology#280
- #422Social Sciences#283
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022-now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
The numbers behind each field
Click a heading to sort. The side that does better in a pair of columns is shaded: a lower rank, a higher rate, more works.
| Field | Aalborg University rank | Linköping University rank | Aalborg University top 10% | Linköping University top 10% | Aalborg University works | Linköping University works |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | #1,014 | #774 | 8.2% | 12.3% | 141 | 85 |
| Arts and Humanities | #623 | #384 | 10.6% | 15.2% | 283 | 139 |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | #763 | #663 | 11.8% | 11.7% | 301 | 221 |
| Business, Management and Accounting | #533 | #172 | 8.7% | 19.7% | 488 | 212 |
| Computer Science | #560 | #423 | 10.4% | 12.3% | 1k | 541 |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | #475 | #271 | 9.5% | 19.2% | 220 | 101 |
| Energy | #47 | - | 19.5% | - | 178 | - |
| Engineering | #220 | #346 | 15.2% | 12.2% | 2.9k | 861 |
| Environmental Science | #519 | #626 | 12.1% | 11.5% | 474 | 182 |
| Health Professions | #374 | #261 | 8.9% | 13.2% | 350 | 182 |
| Materials Science | - | #167 | - | 13.1% | - | 290 |
| Medicine | #348 | #337 | 11.5% | 14.9% | 2.1k | 1.2k |
| Neuroscience | - | #315 | - | 10.7% | - | 158 |
| Psychology | #450 | #280 | 5.6% | 13.3% | 672 | 371 |
| Social Sciences | #422 | #283 | 7.7% | 15.1% | 1.8k | 723 |
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world's share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Energy1.6× 1.0×
- Engineering1.6× 1.0×
- Environmental Science0.8× 0.7×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.4× 0.3×
- Social Sciences1.2× 1.0×
- Business, Management and Accounting1.2× 1.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.8× 0.8×
- Arts and Humanities0.8× 0.8×
- Decision Sciences1.5× 1.5×
- Nursing0.6× 0.6×
- Health Professions1.1× 1.2×
- Medicine1.0× 1.1×
- Computer Science1.1× 1.2×
- Psychology1.8× 2.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.2× 0.3×
- Dentistry0.3× 0.4×
- Neuroscience1.2× 1.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.5× 0.7×
- Chemical Engineering0.5× 0.8×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.5× 0.9×
- Physics and Astronomy0.3× 0.7×
- Chemistry0.2× 0.6×
- Mathematics0.4× 1.2×
- Veterinary0.4× 1.2×
- Materials Science0.4× 1.4×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.2× 0.7×
Location quotient in 2022-now: the share of each side's research in the field over the world's share. 1× is the world's balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Aalborg University leans further are at the top, Linköping University's at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
What is each known for?
The keywords that describe each side's research, by fractional works in 2022-now and weighted toward what it does more of than the world.
Aalborg University
- Distributed Generation
- Electric Vehicles
- Methodology
- Gender Studies
- Discourse Analysis
- Microgrid Control
- Technical Decision-making
- Dementia Care
- Decentralized Control
- Energy Storage Systems
- Pragmatism
- Smart Grid Applications
- Smart Grid
- Embodiment
- Pedagogy
- Qualitative Research
- Machine Learning
- Education
- Sustainability
- Epidemiology
- Renewable Energy
- Power Electronics
- Deep Learning
- Renewable Energy Integration
- Globalization
- Environmental Impact
- Energy Efficiency
- Social Sciences
- Tacit Knowledge
- Thermal Management
- Social Science
- Ethical Guidelines
- Energy Storage
- Interactional Expertise
- Distributed Power Generation
- Learning
- Model Predictive Control
- Special Education
- Quantitative Methods
- Lithium-ion Batteries
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Renewable Energy532▲ 2.9×47 topics
- Epidemiology480◆ 0.94×127 topics
- Power Electronics474▲ 11×8 topics
- Sustainability450▲ 1.43×95 topics
- Deep Learning428◆ 0.96×78 topics
- Education418▲ 1.89×94 topics
- Renewable Energy Integration399▲ 9.4×6 topics
- Machine Learning376◆ 0.88×87 topics
- Globalization325▲ 1.29×113 topics
- Qualitative Research285▲ 2.6×23 topics
- Environmental Impact275▲ 1.26×57 topics
- Pedagogy256▲ 4.0×22 topics
- Energy Efficiency254▲ 2.1×41 topics
- Embodiment243▲ 10×7 topics
- Social Sciences239▲ 13×12 topics
- Smart Grid232▲ 5.0×9 topics
- Tacit Knowledge214▲ 36×3 topics
- Smart Grid Applications201▲ 12×2 topics
- Thermal Management194▲ 4.6×8 topics
- Pragmatism194▲ 61×4 topics
- Social Science193▲ 41×5 topics
- Energy Storage Systems193▲ 11×2 topics
- Ethical Guidelines193▲ 28×3 topics
- Decentralized Control192▲ 13×2 topics
- Energy Storage191▲ 2.3×13 topics
- Dementia Care189▲ 121×2 topics
- Interactional Expertise188▲ 135×1 topic
- Technical Decision-making188▲ 135×1 topic
- Distributed Power Generation179▲ 14×1 topic
- Microgrid Control179▲ 14×1 topic
- Learning176▲ 4.6×10 topics
- Discourse Analysis176▲ 5.6×8 topics
- Model Predictive Control170▲ 5.2×6 topics
- Gender Studies170▲ 8.7×10 topics
- Special Education165▲ 21×5 topics
- Methodology163▲ 26×4 topics
- Quantitative Methods161▲ 95×2 topics
- Electric Vehicles160▲ 4.3×4 topics
- Lithium-ion Batteries154▲ 2.9×4 topics
- Distributed Generation95▲ 9.1×3 topics
Linköping University
- Policy Mixes
- Sustainability Transitions
- PEDOT:PSS
- Language Development
- Light-Emitting Diodes
- Organic Electronics
- Methodology
- Two-Dimensional Materials
- Social Sciences
- Learning
- Special Education
- Anxiety
- Biomedical Applications
- Nanocomposites
- Qualitative Research
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Education
- Quality of Life
- Sustainability
- Machine Learning
- Epidemiology
- Deep Learning
- Inflammation
- Mental Health
- Renewable Energy
- Depression
- Energy Efficiency
- Big Data
- Risk Factors
- Pedagogy
- Resilience
- Discourse Analysis
- Semiconductors
- Gender Studies
- Quantitative Methods
- Nanofibers
- Field-Effect Transistors
- Conducting Polymers
- Polyaniline
- Adaptive Governance
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology286◆ 1.11×126 topics
- Machine Learning216◆ 1.00×81 topics
- Deep Learning198◆ 0.89×75 topics
- Sustainability155◆ 0.98×77 topics
- Inflammation146◆ 1.06×80 topics
- Quality of Life132▲ 1.41×55 topics
- Mental Health130▲ 1.40×39 topics
- Education125◆ 1.13×61 topics
- Renewable Energy119▲ 1.27×41 topics
- Cardiovascular Disease112▲ 1.51×35 topics
- Depression111▲ 1.96×21 topics
- Qualitative Research108▲ 1.95×20 topics
- Energy Efficiency98▲ 1.64×33 topics
- Nanocomposites97▲ 1.89×22 topics
- Big Data93▲ 1.51×25 topics
- Biomedical Applications92▲ 1.20×31 topics
- Risk Factors89▲ 1.25×35 topics
- Anxiety78▲ 2.5×11 topics
- Pedagogy73▲ 2.2×13 topics
- Special Education71▲ 18×5 topics
- Resilience69▲ 2.2×14 topics
- Learning69▲ 3.6×8 topics
- Discourse Analysis68▲ 4.3×7 topics
- Social Sciences67▲ 7.2×6 topics
- Semiconductors66▲ 3.5×5 topics
- Two-Dimensional Materials63▲ 4.2×4 topics
- Gender Studies62▲ 6.2×9 topics
- Methodology59▲ 19×2 topics
- Quantitative Methods58▲ 69×1 topic
- Organic Electronics52▲ 6.0×2 topics
- Nanofibers49▲ 3.7×3 topics
- Light-Emitting Diodes48▲ 5.0×2 topics
- Field-Effect Transistors47▲ 4.7×4 topics
- Language Development46▲ 5.7×5 topics
- Conducting Polymers45▲ 5.3×2 topics
- PEDOT:PSS45▲ 6.2×1 topic
- Polyaniline45▲ 6.2×1 topic
- Sustainability Transitions34▲ 16×2 topics
- Adaptive Governance33▲ 17×1 topic
- Policy Mixes33▲ 17×1 topic
Size is fractional works in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of the side's work against its share of the world's. Each word links to the topic it comes from most.
How has their output grown?
Aalborg University has out-published Linköping University every year since 2006, when it overtook it.
Fractional works per year.
Their share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share, because all of science grows. Each line is a side as a percentage of every work published that year.
Fractional works over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
How much of it reaches the world top 10%
The share of each side's works, year by year, that reached the world's 10% most cited for their field and year. The average of all institutions is 10.0% (why not 10%).
A year with under 1% of the side's peak output is left out: a rate over a handful of papers says nothing. The latest years are still being cited.
Which publishes more research, Aalborg University or Linköping University?
Aalborg University publishes 2.0× as much research as Linköping University in 2022-now (13k against 6.5k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Aalborg University or Linköping University?
13.4% of Linköping University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 11.2% for Aalborg University.
Is Aalborg University or Linköping University growing faster?
Output in 2022-25 was +3% against 2018-21 for Linköping University, and -14% for Aalborg University.
Which has more open access research, Aalborg University or Linköping University?
47% of Linköping University's research is free to read, against 42% of Aalborg University's.
Who are the top researchers on each side?
The most cited researchers on each side, among those ranked.
Aalborg University
- 1 Josep Maria Guerrero #7,055 worldwide 123k citations · 2,069 works
- 2 Juan C. Vásquez #23,361 worldwide 46k citations · 709 works
- 3 Kristine Højgaard Allin #23,644 worldwide 19k citations · 226 works
- 4 Chenjuan Guo #23,785 worldwide 3.6k citations · 150 works
- 5 Sakari Kauppinen #26,925 worldwide 25k citations · 225 works
Linköping University
- 1 Gazi Salah Uddin #6,530 worldwide 12k citations · 373 works
- 2 Sai Bai #8,418 worldwide 18k citations · 140 works
- 3 Joseph Halim #14,485 worldwide 22k citations · 124 works
- 4 Abdelazim G. Hussien #17,527 worldwide 6.4k citations · 134 works
- 5 Olle Inganäs #21,323 worldwide 60k citations · 675 works