Beijing Normal University vs University of California, San Francisco
On research quality in 2022–now, Beijing Normal University ranks #82 in the world and University of California, San Francisco #85, of 28,054 institutions. Beijing Normal University stands higher in 10 of the 16 fields both publish in, University of California, San Francisco in 6.
Research profiles alike: -0.43different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
Beijing Normal University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #82
- #372 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 14k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 28.3%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 30%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology.
University of California, San Francisco
- World rank, 2022–now
- #85
- #37 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 13k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 22.4%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 39%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Transplantation, Family Practice, Virology.
Who leads in each field?
Beijing Normal University stands higher in 10 of 16 fields, University of California, San Francisco in 6. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #57Agricultural and Biological Sciences—
- —Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#34
- #80Chemistry—
- #128Computer Science—
- #13Earth and Planetary Sciences—
- #70Economics, Econometrics and Finance—
- #217Engineering—
- #5Environmental Science—
- —Health Professions#15
- —Immunology and Microbiology#20
- #60Materials Science—
- —Medicine#6
- —Neuroscience#7
- —Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#2
- #30Psychology#63
- #55Social Sciences—
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences2.5× 0.0×
- Energy1.3× 0.0×
- Environmental Science3.3× 0.2×
- Materials Science1.1× 0.1×
- Physics and Astronomy2.4× 0.2×
- Chemical Engineering0.7× 0.1×
- Computer Science1.2× 0.1×
- Mathematics2.8× 0.3×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.8× 0.1×
- Engineering0.6× 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.6× 0.1×
- Chemistry1.4× 0.3×
- Arts and Humanities0.7× 0.1×
- Decision Sciences1.1× 0.3×
- Social Sciences1.1× 0.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.4× 0.6×
- Psychology2.8× 1.6×
- Neuroscience1.8× 2.6×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.5× 1.9×
- Nursing0.3× 1.1×
- Veterinary0.1× 0.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.3× 1.5×
- Health Professions0.4× 2.2×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.2× 2.8×
- Medicine0.2× 3.0×
- Dentistry0.1× 1.3×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where Beijing Normal University leans further are at the top, University of California, San Francisco’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, Beijing Normal University or University of California, San Francisco?
Beijing Normal University publishes 1.1× as much research as University of California, San Francisco in 2022–now (14k against 13k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, Beijing Normal University or University of California, San Francisco?
28.3% of Beijing Normal University's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 22.4% for University of California, San Francisco.