China University of Geosciences vs University of Pittsburgh
On research quality in 2022–now, China University of Geosciences ranks #116 in the world and University of Pittsburgh #117, of 28,054 institutions. China University of Geosciences stands higher in 9 of the 16 fields both publish in, University of Pittsburgh in 7.
Research profiles alike: -0.59different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
China University of Geosciences
- World rank, 2022–now
- #116
- #554 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 9.4k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 30.0%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 26%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics, Earth and Planetary Sciences.
University of Pittsburgh
- World rank, 2022–now
- #117
- #52 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 15k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 19.5%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 33%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Behavioral Neuroscience, Transplantation, Family Practice.
Who leads in each field?
China University of Geosciences stands higher in 9 of 16 fields, University of Pittsburgh in 7. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #399Agricultural and Biological Sciences—
- —Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#71
- #165Chemistry—
- #208Computer Science#314
- #4Earth and Planetary Sciences—
- #72Economics, Econometrics and Finance—
- #41Energy—
- #80Engineering#628
- #8Environmental Science—
- —Health Professions#150
- —Immunology and Microbiology#36
- #107Materials Science—
- —Medicine#54
- —Neuroscience#42
- —Psychology#48
- —Social Sciences#137
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences10.3× 0.3×
- Energy3.0× 0.2×
- Environmental Science3.4× 0.4×
- Engineering2.0× 0.5×
- Materials Science1.3× 0.5×
- Chemical Engineering1.1× 0.4×
- Computer Science1.5× 0.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.1× 0.7×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.2× 0.2×
- Chemistry1.1× 0.7×
- Physics and Astronomy1.2× 0.9×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.3× 0.3×
- Decision Sciences0.6× 0.9×
- Mathematics0.6× 0.9×
- Social Sciences0.2× 0.7×
- Nursing0.2× 0.9×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.3× 1.7×
- Arts and Humanities0.1× 0.8×
- Psychology0.2× 1.9×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.1× 0.9×
- Health Professions0.1× 1.5×
- Dentistry0.1× 0.8×
- Neuroscience0.2× 3.1×
- Medicine0.1× 1.9×
- Immunology and Microbiology0.1× 2.4×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where China University of Geosciences leans further are at the top, University of Pittsburgh’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, China University of Geosciences or University of Pittsburgh?
University of Pittsburgh publishes 1.6× as much research as China University of Geosciences in 2022–now (15k against 9.4k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, China University of Geosciences or University of Pittsburgh?
30.0% of China University of Geosciences's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 19.5% for University of Pittsburgh.