King's College London vs Saveetha University
On research quality in 2022–now, Saveetha University ranks #88 in the world and King's College London #90, of 28,054 institutions. King's College London stands higher in 7 of the 15 fields both publish in, Saveetha University in 8.
Research profiles alike: -0.11different shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
King's College London
- World rank, 2022–now
- #90
- #120 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 15k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 25.2%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 42%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry, Music.
Saveetha University
- World rank, 2022–now
- #88
- #691 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 20k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 16.6%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 45%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Periodontics, General Dentistry, Dentistry.
Who leads in each field?
King's College London stands higher in 7 of 15 fields, Saveetha University in 8. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- —Agricultural and Biological Sciences#151
- #49Arts and Humanities—
- #155Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#267
- —Chemistry#88
- #139Computer Science#79
- #14Dentistry#4
- —Engineering#57
- —Environmental Science#73
- #2Health Professions#6
- —Materials Science#39
- #22Medicine#129
- #15Neuroscience—
- —Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics#1
- #4Psychology—
- #24Social Sciences—
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Arts and Humanities2.0× 0.1×
- Social Sciences1.5× 0.1×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.6× 0.2×
- Physics and Astronomy1.2× 0.2×
- Psychology2.5× 0.5×
- Mathematics1.0× 0.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.8× 0.4×
- Neuroscience2.3× 1.3×
- Immunology and Microbiology1.1× 0.7×
- Health Professions1.8× 1.1×
- Medicine1.4× 0.9×
- Decision Sciences1.1× 1.0×
- Nursing0.9× 0.9×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.0× 1.0×
- Veterinary0.3× 0.4×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences0.2× 0.2×
- Environmental Science0.3× 0.8×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics0.9× 2.2×
- Computer Science0.7× 2.2×
- Chemistry0.3× 1.2×
- Engineering0.3× 1.4×
- Dentistry2.5× 13.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.1× 0.8×
- Energy0.2× 1.8×
- Chemical Engineering0.1× 1.1×
- Materials Science0.2× 2.0×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where King's College London leans further are at the top, Saveetha University’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, King's College London or Saveetha University?
Saveetha University publishes 1.3× as much research as King's College London in 2022–now (20k against 15k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, King's College London or Saveetha University?
25.2% of King's College London's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 16.6% for Saveetha University.