The University of Queensland vs University of Copenhagen
On research quality in 2022–now, The University of Queensland ranks #74 in the world and University of Copenhagen #77, of 28,054 institutions. The University of Queensland stands higher in 9 of the 15 fields both publish in, University of Copenhagen in 6.
Research profiles alike: 0.58similar shapes of research, whatever their size. How it is measured
The University of Queensland
- World rank, 2022–now
- #74
- #103 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 17k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 27.4%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 34%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Equine, General Decision Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology.
University of Copenhagen
- World rank, 2022–now
- #77
- #113 all time
- Works, 2022–now
- 14k
- fractional
- Top-10% rate
- 26.5%
- share of its work among the world’s most cited
- Open access
- 42%
- of its works free to read
Strongest relative focus: Equine, Medical Terminology, Veterinary.
Who leads in each field?
The University of Queensland stands higher in 9 of 15 fields, University of Copenhagen in 6. Each bar is that side’s standing among all institutions ranked in the field: the full bar is first place.
- #105Agricultural and Biological Sciences#38
- #101Arts and Humanities#93
- #76Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology#33
- #23Business, Management and Accounting—
- #197Computer Science—
- —Earth and Planetary Sciences#90
- #184Engineering—
- #26Environmental Science#72
- #13Health Professions#151
- #81Materials Science—
- #75Medicine#79
- —Neuroscience#27
- —Physics and Astronomy#49
- #12Psychology#125
- #14Social Sciences#35
Standing is the percentile of world rank within each field, 2022–now; the printed number is the rank itself. A dash means the field is too small there to rank. How sides are compared.
Where does each put its research?
Not who is better, but what each side chooses to work on. A country or institution that puts twice the world’s share of its research into a field sits at 2×, whatever its size.
- Engineering0.7× 0.2×
- Energy1.0× 0.4×
- Business, Management and Accounting0.8× 0.4×
- Dentistry1.5× 0.9×
- Materials Science0.7× 0.5×
- Health Professions1.6× 1.0×
- Chemical Engineering0.8× 0.5×
- Decision Sciences1.1× 0.8×
- Environmental Science1.5× 1.2×
- Psychology1.7× 1.3×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.0× 0.8×
- Computer Science0.6× 0.6×
- Social Sciences1.1× 1.1×
- Neuroscience1.6× 1.7×
- Immunology and Microbiology1.4× 1.7×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences1.1× 1.2×
- Medicine1.0× 1.2×
- Nursing1.2× 1.5×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.9× 1.3×
- Chemistry0.7× 1.1×
- Arts and Humanities1.0× 1.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics1.1× 1.7×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology1.2× 2.0×
- Veterinary2.7× 4.8×
- Physics and Astronomy0.7× 1.5×
- Mathematics0.6× 1.3×
Location quotient in 2022–now: the share of each side’s research in the field over the world’s share. 1× is the world’s balance; the axis runs from a quarter of it to four times. Fields where The University of Queensland leans further are at the top, University of Copenhagen’s at the bottom. How research profiles are compared.
How has their output grown?
Fractional works per year. The latest, partial year is left off.
Which publishes more research, The University of Queensland or University of Copenhagen?
The University of Queensland publishes 1.2× as much research as University of Copenhagen in 2022–now (17k against 14k fractional works).
Whose research has more impact, The University of Queensland or University of Copenhagen?
27.4% of The University of Queensland's research reaches the world's top 10% most cited, against 26.5% for University of Copenhagen.