Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Hospital / health system · Laurel · United States

Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis

bwanalysis.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
64
▲ 101% vs 2018-21
Citations
419
6.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
2.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
9%
world 40%
International
3%
world 18%
Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis

Not ranked overall: Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis work in?

In all years, 91% of research at Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis is in Social Sciences, 4% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Psychology (68%), Social Sciences (13%), Arts and Humanities (7%). It does 3.7× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 58 fractional works · 90.5% of its workPsychology: 44 fractional works · 68.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 33 fractional works · 51.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 4 fractional works · 6.0% of its workGeneral Psychology: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 2 fractional works · 3.2% of its workApplied Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 8 fractional works · 12.7% of its workSociology and Political Science: 4 fractional works · 6.4% of its workGender Studies: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 5 fractional works · 7.5% of its workPhilosophy: 2 fractional works · 3.6% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workStrategy and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workHealth Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.7% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 2.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPharmacy: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workVeterinary: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 3.4% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workNeurology: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.3% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workInformation Systems: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workALL ITS WORKBaltimoreWashington Cente…64fractional works, all years
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences2%Health Sciences4%Social Sciences91%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 15 fields, with their numbers
    1. Psychology4468.5%
    2. Social Sciences812.7%
    3. Arts and Humanities57.5%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting11.1%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance10.8%
    1. Medicine22.6%
    2. Health Professions11.0%
    3. Veterinary00.1%
    1. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology11.8%
    2. Neuroscience11.5%
    3. Agricultural and Biological Sciences00.1%
    1. Computer Science12.0%
    2. Environmental Science00.2%
    3. Mathematics00.2%
    4. Engineering00.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Environmental Science: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 1.08× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.28× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.15× its world share, 1 worksArts and HumanitiesPsychology: 21.51× its world share, 9 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 1.47× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 21.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology21.51×9 works
  2. Arts and Humanities2.15×1 works
  3. Social Sciences1.47×2 works
  4. Health Professions1.08×0 works
  5. Medicine0.28×1 works
  6. Environmental Science0.17×0 works
  7. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.09×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis?

Ranked on the quality score, Dale R. Meers and Bruce H. Sklarew lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis.

  1. 1 Dale R. Meers United States · #2,590,818 worldwide 216 citations · 20 works
  2. 2 Bruce H. Sklarew United States · #4,578,960 worldwide 138 citations · 30 works
All ranked researchers at Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis

What are the most cited papers from Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis?

The most cited paper from Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis is "I. Introduction" (Joseph Jaffe, Beatrice A. Beebe, Stanley Feldstein et al., 2001), with 261 citations. Next come "Clarification of projective identification" (60) and "Therapeutic Considerations Arising from the Intense Symbiotic Needs of Schizophrenic Patients." (45).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 I. Introduction Joseph Jaffe, Beatrice A. Beebe, Stanley Feldstein et al. · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development Apr 2001 261
2 Clarification of projective identification William N. Goldstein · American Journal of Psychiatry Open access Feb 1991 60
3 Therapeutic Considerations Arising from the Intense Symbiotic Needs of Schizophrenic Patients. Ruth Wilmann Lidz, Theodore Lidz Book chapter 12 Jul 2005 45
4 Psychodynamic Treatment of Depression Leon A. Levin · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease Apr 2005 45
5 Undoing the Lag in the Technique of Conflict and Defense Analysis Paul S. Gray · The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 1996 34
All 98 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Meta-Analysis, Evidence-Based Practice, Psychotherapy Outcome, Therapeutic Alliance, Mental Health, Feminism, Ethics and History.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Meta-Analysis22▲ 63×4 topics
  2. Evidence-Based Practice20▲ 185×2 topics
  3. Psychotherapy Outcome20▲ 750×1 topic
  4. Therapeutic Alliance20▲ 750×1 topic
  5. Mental Health8▲ 11×18 topics
  6. Feminism5▲ 31×7 topics
  7. Ethics5▲ 17×5 topics
  8. History5▲ 9.8×4 topics
  9. Neoliberalism4▲ 18×3 topics
  10. Psychopathology3▲ 30×3 topics
  11. Psychoanalysis3▲ 60×4 topics
  12. Neuroscience3▲ 15×5 topics
  13. Psychology3▲ 34×3 topics
  14. Emotion Regulation3▲ 13×4 topics
  15. Education3▲ 3.2×6 topics
  16. Gender3▲ 7.2×8 topics
  17. Neurobiological Correlates3▲ 42×3 topics
  18. Epistemology2▲ 84×1 topic
  19. Science2▲ 21×1 topic
  20. Group Therapy2▲ 80×2 topics
  21. Personality Traits2▲ 31×4 topics
  22. Psychiatric Disorders2▲ 23×2 topics
  23. Social Constructionism2▲ 86×2 topics
  24. Intervention2▲ 78×2 topics
  25. Narrative Analysis2▲ 49×2 topics
  26. Phenomenology2▲ 25×2 topics
  27. Attachment2▲ 24×4 topics
  28. Child-Centered2▲ 202×1 topic
  29. Play Therapy2▲ 202×1 topic
  30. Borderline Personality Disorder2▲ 131×1 topic
  31. DSM2▲ 77×1 topic
  32. DSM-52▲ 131×1 topic
  33. Family Therapy2▲ 123×2 topics
  34. Self-Experience2▲ 77×1 topic
  35. Adolescents2▲ 7.9×3 topics
  36. Media2▲ 20×3 topics
  37. Open Dialogue Approach2▲ 142×1 topic
  38. Solution-Focused Brief Therapy2▲ 142×1 topic
  39. Lacanian Discourse Analysis2▲ 542×1 topic
  40. Resistance2▲ 22×2 topics

Which research topics does Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Gender Roles and Identity Studies and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism.

Psychotherapy Techniques…5Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications: 5 fractional worksAttachment and Relationship Dynamics: 1 fractional worksGender Roles and Identity Studies: 0 fractional worksShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism: 0 fractional worksAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology: 0 fractional worksInterdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies: 0 fractional worksHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes: 0 fractional worksGender and Feminist Studies: 0 fractional worksEating Disorders and Behaviors: 0 fractional worksPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research: 0 fractional works
Clinical PsychologySocial PsychologyGender StudiesLiterature and Literary Theory3 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications Clinical Psychology 5 works
  2. 2 Attachment and Relationship Dynamics Social Psychology 1 works
  3. 3 Gender Roles and Identity Studies Gender Studies 0 works
  4. 4 Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  5. 5 Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology General Psychology 0 works
  6. 6 Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  7. 7 Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes History 0 works
  8. 8 Gender and Feminist Studies Gender Studies 0 works
  9. 9 Eating Disorders and Behaviors Clinical Psychology 0 works
  10. 10 Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research Clinical Psychology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available8.9%not open91.1%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors3.4%domestic only96.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 101% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000069% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis0.000087% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Laurel

All research institutions in Laurel

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Baltimore Washington Center for Psychoanalysis. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.