Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Newton · United States

Carroll Center for the Blind

carroll.orgROR OpenAlex
Research works
13
fractional, all time
Citations
31
2.3 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
9%
world 40%
International
4%
world 18%
Carroll Center for the Blind

Not ranked overall: Carroll Center for the Blind is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Carroll Center for the Blind work in?

In all years, 58% of research at Carroll Center for the Blind is in Health Sciences, 35% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (50%), Social Sciences (20%), Health Professions (8%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 8 fractional works · 57.9% of its workMedicine: 7 fractional works · 49.7% of its workOphthalmology: 2 fractional works · 18.9% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 2 fractional works · 16.4% of its workSurgery: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 5.1% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 8.2% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 5 fractional works · 35.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 20.2% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workPhilosophy: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workPhysical Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workALL ITS WORKCarroll Centerfor the Blind13fractional works, all years
Life Sciences4%Physical Sciences2%Health Sciences58%Social Sciences35%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 7 fields, with their numbers
    1. Medicine749.7%
    2. Health Professions18.2%
    1. Social Sciences320.2%
    2. Arts and Humanities17.6%
    3. Psychology17.6%
    1. Neuroscience14.4%
    1. Computer Science02.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at Carroll Center for the Blind?

Ranked on the quality score, Margaret E. Cleary lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Carroll Center for the Blind.

  1. 1 Margaret E. Cleary United States · #4,347,633 worldwide 40 citations · 16 works
All ranked researchers at Carroll Center for the Blind

What are the most cited papers from Carroll Center for the Blind?

The most cited paper from Carroll Center for the Blind is "Field Evaluation of a Mobile App for Assisting Blind and Visually Impaired Travelers to Find Bus Stops" (Shrinivas J. Pundlik, Prerana Shivshanker, Tim Traut-Savino et al., 2024), with 10 citations. Next come "Aiding the Person who is Visually Impaired from Diabetes" (9) and "Electronic Sensory Aids in a Concept Development Program for Congenitally Blind Young Adults" (8).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Field Evaluation of a Mobile App for Assisting Blind and Visually Impaired Travelers to Find Bus Stops Shrinivas J. Pundlik, Prerana Shivshanker, Tim Traut-Savino et al. · Translational Vision Science & Technology Open access 15 Jan 2024 10
2 Aiding the Person who is Visually Impaired from Diabetes Margaret E. Cleary · The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care 1985 9
3 Electronic Sensory Aids in a Concept Development Program for Congenitally Blind Young Adults M. W. Scione · Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness Mar 1978 8
4 Lighting a Lamp for Persons Who Are Visually Challenged Margaret E. Cleary, Christopher A. Fahy · The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care Aug 1989 7
5 Professional Development Margaret E. Cleary · The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care Aug 1993 4
All 13 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Carroll Center for the Blind publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Retinal and Optic Conditions, Tactile and Sensory Interactions, Older Adults Driving Studies and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies.

Retinal and Optic Condit…1Retinal and Optic Conditions: 1 fractional worksTactile and Sensory Interactions: 0 fractional worksOlder Adults Driving Studies: 0 fractional worksOphthalmology and Visual…0Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies: 0 fractional works
OphthalmologyCognitive NeurosciencePhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and RehabilitationEpidemiology

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Retinal and Optic Conditions Ophthalmology 1 works
  2. 2 Tactile and Sensory Interactions Cognitive Neuroscience 0 works
  3. 3 Older Adults Driving Studies Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 0 works
  4. 4 Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies Epidemiology 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available9.4%not open90.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors3.8%domestic only96.2%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Carroll Center for the Blind's research output changed?

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Carroll Center for the Blind as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000019% in 2022.

0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Carroll Center for the Blind0.0000045% in 202419801990200020102020

Fractional works of Carroll Center for the Blind over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Newton

All research institutions in Newton

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Carroll Center for the Blind. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.