Science Explorer Back to mapMap
University · Sèvres · France

CIEP

In research, CIEP stands highest in Social Sciences (#2,985 of 9,330 worldwide), Social Sciences (#4,949 of 14,833 worldwide) and Sociology and Political Science (#2,015 of 4,066 worldwide), over all time.

World rank, all time
#11,358
of 34,923
Rank in France
#362
of 943
Research works
675
▼ 65% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.3k
3.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
5.1%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.03×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
62%
world 40%
International
33%
world 18%

What is CIEP known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesField #2,985 of 9,330 4.1%411
Social SciencesDomain #4,949 of 14,833 4.1%524
Sociology and Political ScienceSubfield #2,015 of 4,066 4.8%179

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where CIEP sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does CIEP work in?

In 2022-now, 78% of research at CIEP is in Social Sciences, 16% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (50%), Arts and Humanities (18%), Medicine (12%). It does 2.5× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 23 fractional works · 78.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 15 fractional works · 49.6% of its workSociology and Political Science: 9 fractional works · 29.5% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 3 fractional works · 8.7% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workUrban Studies: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workLinguistics and Language: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workGeneral Social Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workArts and Humanities: 5 fractional works · 18.0% of its workPhilosophy: 2 fractional works · 5.4% of its workClassics: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workReligious studies: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 3 fractional works · 10.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 3 fractional works · 9.0% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 5 fractional works · 16.3% of its workMedicine: 4 fractional works · 12.2% of its workHematology: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workDermatology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.9% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workSpeech and Hearing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKCIEP30fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences3%Health Sciences16%Social Sciences78%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences1549.6%
    2. Arts and Humanities518.0%
    3. Psychology310.5%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting00.1%
    1. Medicine412.2%
    2. Health Professions13.9%
    3. Nursing00.2%
    1. Engineering01.3%
    2. Computer Science01.3%
    3. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.1%
    4. Environmental Science00.1%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.7%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.7%
    3. Immunology and Microbiology00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.35× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.31× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Computer Science: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Engineering: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.03× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 1.48× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.63× its world share, 4 worksMedicineNursing: 0.33× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 6.23× its world share, 5 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Psychology: 3.43× its world share, 3 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.92× its world share, 15 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 6.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 14 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities6.23×5 works
  2. Social Sciences3.92×15 works
  3. Psychology3.43×3 works
  4. Health Professions1.48×1 works
  5. Medicine0.63×4 works
  6. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.35×0 works
  7. Nursing0.33×0 works
  8. Immunology and Microbiology0.31×0 works
  9. Computer Science0.17×0 works
  10. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.13×0 works
  11. Earth and Planetary Sciences0.09×0 works
  12. Engineering0.09×0 works
  13. Business, Management and Accounting0.04×0 works
  14. Environmental Science0.03×0 works

Who are the top researchers at CIEP?

Ranked on the quality score, Nathalie Baïdak, V. Loffredo and Anton De Grauwe lead among researchers whose main affiliation is CIEP.

  1. 1 Nathalie Baïdak France · #1,075,374 worldwide 350 citations · 17 works
  2. 2 V. Loffredo France · #2,408,304 worldwide 309 citations · 26 works
  3. 3 Anton De Grauwe France · #2,852,012 worldwide 340 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Richard K. Johanson France · #2,945,479 worldwide 503 citations · 23 works
  5. 5 Xavier Léon‐Dufour France · #2,975,182 worldwide 178 citations · 26 works
  6. 6 Jean Duverger France · #3,080,868 worldwide 104 citations · 30 works
  7. 7 Marcel Duhamel France · #3,119,865 worldwide 42 citations · 32 works
  8. 8 Cecilia Braslavsky France · #3,175,655 worldwide 380 citations · 72 works
  9. 9 Françoise Barbaras France · #3,179,315 worldwide 4 citations · 20 works
  10. 10 Omar Brino France · #3,949,064 worldwide 2 citations · 22 works
All ranked researchers at CIEP

What are the most cited papers from CIEP?

The most cited paper from CIEP is "Essential Roles of Enteric Neuronal Serotonin in Gastrointestinal Motility and the Development/Survival of Enteric Dopaminergic Neurons" (Zhiqing Li, Alcmène Chalazonitis, Yuan Huang et al., 2011), with 411 citations. Next come "Serum antimüllerian hormone/müllerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol" (317) and "Animal Models of Depression: Utility for Transgenic Research" (289).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Essential Roles of Enteric Neuronal Serotonin in Gastrointestinal Motility and the Development/Survival of Enteric Dopaminergic Neurons Zhiqing Li, Alcmène Chalazonitis, Yuan Huang et al. · Journal of Neuroscience Open access 15 Jun 2011 411
2 Serum antimüllerian hormone/müllerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol Andre Hazout, Philippe Bouchard, David B. Seifer et al. · Fertility and Sterility Open access Nov 2004 317
3 Animal Models of Depression: Utility for Transgenic Research Roger D. Porsolt · Reviews in the Neurosciences 2000 289
4 Differentiation of antique ceramics from the Raman spectra of their coloured glazes and paintings Philippe Colomban, Gérard Sagon, Xavier Faurel · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy May 2001 251
5 Effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 on the kinase activity of wild-type and various mutated c-kit receptors found in mast cell neoplasms Yaël Zermati, Paulo De Sepulveda, Frédéric Féger et al. · Oncogene 5 Feb 2003 194
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at CIEP?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Gender, Religion, Intercultural Communication, Youth Development, Family Dynamics, Societal Change, Migration and Islam.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Gender4▲ 22×7 topics
  2. Religion4▲ 25×6 topics
  3. Intercultural Communication3▲ 248×2 topics
  4. Youth Development3▲ 112×2 topics
  5. Family Dynamics3▲ 79×1 topic
  6. Societal Change3▲ 1052×1 topic
  7. Migration3▲ 27×3 topics
  8. Islam3▲ 42×2 topics
  9. Democracy2▲ 24×3 topics
  10. Social Change2▲ 66×2 topics
  11. Mental Health2▲ 5.1×2 topics
  12. Public Policy2▲ 15×3 topics
  13. Family Law2▲ 161×1 topic
  14. Reform2▲ 110×1 topic
  15. Social Justice2▲ 12×5 topics
  16. Developmental Trauma2▲ 312×1 topic
  17. Psychodynamic Psychotherapy2▲ 312×1 topic
  18. Community Engagement2▲ 17×3 topics
  19. Ethics2▲ 11×5 topics
  20. Gender Studies2▲ 35×3 topics
  21. Globalization1▲ 2.4×6 topics
  22. Local Development1▲ 43×2 topics
  23. Sociopolitical1▲ 132×3 topics
  24. Sustainability1▲ 1.81×6 topics
  25. Territorial Governance1▲ 39×2 topics
  26. Colonialism1▲ 8.8×4 topics
  27. Epidemiology1◆ 0.98×12 topics
  28. Historical Narratives1▲ 72×2 topics
  29. Inequality1▲ 17×2 topics
  30. Philosophy1▲ 8.8×5 topics
  31. Social Determinants of Health1▲ 18×2 topics
  32. Sociological Analysis1▲ 72×2 topics
  33. Climate Change1▲ 1.33×4 topics
  34. Education1▲ 2.2×5 topics
  35. History1▲ 5.2×4 topics
  36. Cultural Identity1▲ 6.8×4 topics
  37. Family Support Policies1▲ 224×1 topic
  38. Innovation1▲ 3.2×2 topics
  39. Quality of Life1▲ 2.3×4 topics
  40. Urban Segregation1▲ 224×1 topic

Which research topics does CIEP publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory, Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender, Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research and Social Policies and Family.

  1. 1 Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory Sociology and Political Science 3 works
  2. 2 Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender Political Science and International Relations 2 works
  3. 3 Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research Clinical Psychology 2 works
  4. 4 Social Policies and Family Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  5. 5 Education, sociology, and vocational training Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  6. 6 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 1 works
  7. 7 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  8. 8 Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Philosophy 1 works
  9. 9 Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis History and Philosophy of Science 1 works
  10. 10 Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications Clinical Psychology 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available61.8%not open38.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors32.9%domestic only67.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has CIEP's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 65% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is CIEP as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000089% in 2024.

still counting0.0010%0.0020%0.0030%CIEP0.00013% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of CIEP over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

5%10%15%all institutions10.0% in 2019CIEP5.7% in 201920002010

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 10.1% in 2012.

Other research institutions in Sèvres

All research institutions in Sèvres

Share CIEP's ranking

CIEP on Science Explorer

A card with CIEP's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about CIEP. Posts are plain text and can be reported.