Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Nonprofit · New York · United States

Clinton Foundation

World rank, all time
#21,883
of 42,892
Rank in United States
#4,713
of 8,685
Research works
297
▼ 13% vs 2013–17
Citations
3.1k
10.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
12.8%
record average 16.5%
Open access
32%
world 28%

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.55× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1.00× its world share, 2 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 3.47× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.98× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.56× its world share, 3 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 1.20× its world share, 1 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 1.12× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 1.28× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.35× its world share, 10 worksMedicineNursing: 1.09× its world share, 0 worksNursingVeterinary: 2.39× its world share, 0 worksVeterinaryBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 4.57× its world share, 4 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.42× its world share, 2 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.23× its world share, 11 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 4.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Clinton Foundation?

Ranked on the composite score, Theo. Holm and H.W. Arrowsmith lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Clinton Foundation.

  1. 1 Theo. Holm United States · #1,387,241 worldwide 12 citations · 26 works
  2. 2 H.W. Arrowsmith United States · #1,492,365 worldwide 2 citations · 16 works
All ranked researchers at Clinton Foundation

Which keywords describe research at Clinton Foundation?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Middle East, Politics, Genocide, Health Impact, Media, Qatar and Vaccine.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 39 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 39 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology7▲ 4.2×45 topics
  2. Middle East4▲ 164×2 topics
  3. Globalization3▲ 3.8×5 topics
  4. Politics3▲ 26×3 topics
  5. Genocide3▲ 125×2 topics
  6. Health Impact3▲ 128×2 topics
  7. Media2▲ 40×1 topic
  8. Public Health2▲ 4.2×16 topics
  9. Qatar2▲ 320×1 topic
  10. Vaccine2▲ 14×10 topics
  11. Pathogenesis2▲ 10×10 topics
  12. Human Rights2▲ 4.8×3 topics
  13. International Relations2▲ 20×2 topics
  14. Global Trade2▲ 23×2 topics
  15. Political Economy2▲ 19×2 topics
  16. Coercive Diplomacy2▲ 274×1 topic
  17. Economic Sanctions2▲ 177×1 topic
  18. Islamic reform2▲ 95×1 topic
  19. Ottoman Empire2▲ 56×1 topic
  20. Cardiovascular Disease2▲ 3.6×7 topics
  21. Immune Response2▲ 7.2×9 topics
  22. Antibiotic Resistance1▲ 8.7×2 topics
  23. Radicalization1▲ 121×1 topic
  24. Terrorism1▲ 71×1 topic
  25. Treatment1▲ 2.6×8 topics
  26. Artificial Intelligence1▲ 2.2×2 topics
  27. Digital Sovereignty1▲ 67×1 topic
  28. Genetic Diversity1▲ 6.7×3 topics
  29. Monte Carlo Simulation1▲ 14×2 topics
  30. Nation-Building1▲ 54×2 topics
  31. State-Building1▲ 79×2 topics
  32. Transition Economy1▲ 102×1 topic
  33. Infectious Diseases1▲ 8.0×5 topics
  34. Critical Phenomena1▲ 125×1 topic
  35. Diagnosis1▲ 2.7×7 topics
  36. Mental Health1▲ 1.72×7 topics
  37. Phase Transitions1▲ 43×1 topic
  38. Psychosocial Work Environment1▲ 94×1 topic
  39. Work-related Stress1▲ 27×1 topic

Which research topics does Clinton Foundation publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts, Economic Sanctions and International Relations, Islamic Studies and History and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence.

  1. 1 Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  2. 2 Economic Sanctions and International Relations Economics and Econometrics 2 works
  3. 3 Islamic Studies and History Political Science and International Relations 2 works
  4. 4 Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  5. 5 Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  6. 6 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 1 works
  7. 7 Theoretical and Computational Physics Condensed Matter Physics 1 works
  8. 8 Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  9. 9 Nuclear Issues and Defense Political Science and International Relations 1 works
  10. 10 Viral Infections and Vectors Infectious Diseases 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available32.5%not open67.5%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors18.6%domestic only81.4%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Clinton Foundation's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 13% lower than in 2013–2017.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in New York

All research institutions in New York

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.