Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Nuclear Issues and Defense

Nuclear Issues and Defense is a research topic within Political Science and International Relations. Science Explorer counts 13k research works in it since 1950. 19.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers explores the potential consequences of nuclear war, including its impact on climate, global food security, environmental devastation, and public health. It also delves into discussions around arms control, nuclear winter, and strategies for reducing the risks associated with nuclear conflicts. The papers highlight the urgent need to address the complex challenges posed by nuclear weapons and their potential for catastrophic global effects.

  • Nuclear War
  • Climate Consequences
  • Global Catastrophes
  • Food Insecurity
  • Environmental Impact
  • Human Security
  • Arms Control
  • Nuclear Winter
  • Global Famine
  • Public Health
Research works
13k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
2.6k
per year above
Top-10% rate
19.7%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+45%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Nuclear Issues and Defense research?

By volume, the United States and Russia publish the most (511 and 336 works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 United States 511 works
  2. 2 Russia 336 works
  3. 3 United Kingdom 186 works
  4. 4 Ukraine 95 works
  5. 5 Germany 75 works
  6. 6 China 58 works
  7. 7 France 52 works
  8. 8 Australia 48 works
  9. 9 Canada 47 works
  10. 10 India 47 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

United States: 35.1%Russia: 23.1%United Kingdom: 12.8%Ukraine: 6.5%6 others listed: 22.5%35%largest
United States511 · 35.1%Russia336 · 23.1%United Kingdom186 · 12.8%Ukraine95 · 6.5%6 others listed327 · 22.5%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Nuclear Issues and Defense research?

By volume in 2022–2025, King's College London publishes the most Nuclear Issues and Defense research, followed by Institute of World Economy and International Relations and Moscow State Institute of International Relations.

Who are the leading researchers in Nuclear Issues and Defense?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Nuclear Issues and Defense include James A. Russell, Hans A. Bethe and E. P. Wigner.

  1. 1 James A. Russell United States 5k citations
  2. 2 Hans A. Bethe United States 3.1k citations
  3. 3 E. P. Wigner United States 2.8k citations
  4. 4 Morton Deutsch United States 2.4k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Nuclear Issues and Defense research done?

The largest centres of Nuclear Issues and Defense research in 2022–2025 are Moscow (Russia), London (United Kingdom), Washington D.C. (United States) and Kyiv (Ukraine). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Yekaterinburg and Moscow.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Moscow Russia 194 works
  2. 2 London United Kingdom 60 works
  3. 3 Washington D.C. United States 52 works
  4. 4 Kyiv Ukraine 50 works
  5. 5 Saint Petersburg Russia 36 works
  6. 6 New York United States 28 works
  7. 7 Paris France 28 works
  8. 8 Beijing China 23 works
  9. 9 Yekaterinburg Russia 20 works
  10. 10 Seoul South Korea 20 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. YekaterinburgRU · 20.1 works10×
  2. MoscowRU · 194.4 works9.0×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Nuclear Issues and Defense than the world average.

See Nuclear Issues and Defense on the map

Where is the best place to study Nuclear Issues and Defense?

Among universities, judged by research, King's College London, Moscow State Institute of International Relations and Lomonosov Moscow State University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%10%20%mean 17.1286%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →King's College London: 20, 23.5%Moscow State Institute of International Relations: 13, 14.6%Lomonosov Moscow State University: 11, 15.7%Australian National University: 10, 16.3%Ural Federal University: 8, 17.3%National Research University Higher School of Economics: 9, 17.8%Weatherford College: 9, 14.7%King's College LondonAustralian National …Lomonosov Moscow Sta…Moscow State Institu…
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 King's College LondonUnited Kingdom 96.523.5%13.3×20 +402.2%
2 Moscow State Institute of International RelationsRussia 67.914.6%37.0×13 +334.7%
3 Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityRussia 58.615.7%6.0×11 +319.9%
4 Australian National UniversityAustralia 58.116.3%10.2×10 -34.3%
5 Ural Federal UniversityRussia 55.117.3%13.4×8
6 National Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussia 52.317.8%10.5×9 -34.8%
7 Weatherford CollegeUnited States 21.914.7%3.3×9 -70.1%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Nuclear Issues and Defense research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 45% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025. The fastest-growing topics are Nuclear Issues and Defense.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.