- World rank, all time
- #21,883 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #4,713 of 8,685
- Research works
- 297 ▼ 13% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.1k 10.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 12.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 32% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 4.6×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.6×
- Immunology and Microbiology 3.5×
- Veterinary 2.4×
- Social Sciences 2.2×
- Psychology 1.4×
- Medicine 1.4×
- Health Professions 1.3×
- Mathematics 1.2×
- Physics and Astronomy 1.1×
- Nursing 1.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1.0×
- Neuroscience 1.0×
- Engineering 0.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.6×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.2×
- Computer Science 0.1×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Clinton Foundation?
Ranked on the composite score, Theo. Holm and H.W. Arrowsmith lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Clinton Foundation.
- 1 Theo. Holm United States · #1,387,241 worldwide 12 citations · 26 works
- 2 H.W. Arrowsmith United States · #1,492,365 worldwide 2 citations · 16 works
Which keywords describe research at Clinton Foundation?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Middle East, Politics, Genocide, Health Impact, Media, Qatar and Vaccine.
- Psychosocial Work Environment
- Mental Health
- Critical Phenomena
- Transition Economy
- Nation-Building
- Genetic Diversity
- Artificial Intelligence
- Terrorism
- Antibiotic Resistance
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Islamic reform
- Coercive Diplomacy
- Global Trade
- Human Rights
- Vaccine
- Public Health
- Health Impact
- Politics
- Middle East
- Epidemiology
- Globalization
- Genocide
- Media
- Qatar
- Pathogenesis
- International Relations
- Political Economy
- Economic Sanctions
- Ottoman Empire
- Immune Response
- Radicalization
- Treatment
- Digital Sovereignty
- Monte Carlo Simulation
- State-Building
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnosis
- Phase Transitions
- Work-related Stress
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 39 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 39 words, with their numbers
- Epidemiology7▲ 4.2×45 topics
- Middle East4▲ 164×2 topics
- Globalization3▲ 3.8×5 topics
- Politics3▲ 26×3 topics
- Genocide3▲ 125×2 topics
- Health Impact3▲ 128×2 topics
- Media2▲ 40×1 topic
- Public Health2▲ 4.2×16 topics
- Qatar2▲ 320×1 topic
- Vaccine2▲ 14×10 topics
- Pathogenesis2▲ 10×10 topics
- Human Rights2▲ 4.8×3 topics
- International Relations2▲ 20×2 topics
- Global Trade2▲ 23×2 topics
- Political Economy2▲ 19×2 topics
- Coercive Diplomacy2▲ 274×1 topic
- Economic Sanctions2▲ 177×1 topic
- Islamic reform2▲ 95×1 topic
- Ottoman Empire2▲ 56×1 topic
- Cardiovascular Disease2▲ 3.6×7 topics
- Immune Response2▲ 7.2×9 topics
- Antibiotic Resistance1▲ 8.7×2 topics
- Radicalization1▲ 121×1 topic
- Terrorism1▲ 71×1 topic
- Treatment1▲ 2.6×8 topics
- Artificial Intelligence1▲ 2.2×2 topics
- Digital Sovereignty1▲ 67×1 topic
- Genetic Diversity1▲ 6.7×3 topics
- Monte Carlo Simulation1▲ 14×2 topics
- Nation-Building1▲ 54×2 topics
- State-Building1▲ 79×2 topics
- Transition Economy1▲ 102×1 topic
- Infectious Diseases1▲ 8.0×5 topics
- Critical Phenomena1▲ 125×1 topic
- Diagnosis1▲ 2.7×7 topics
- Mental Health1▲ 1.72×7 topics
- Phase Transitions1▲ 43×1 topic
- Psychosocial Work Environment1▲ 94×1 topic
- Work-related Stress1▲ 27×1 topic
Which research topics does Clinton Foundation publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts, Economic Sanctions and International Relations, Islamic Studies and History and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 2 Economic Sanctions and International Relations Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 3 Islamic Studies and History Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 4 Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence Sociology and Political Science 1 works
- 5 Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 6 Workplace Health and Well-being General Health Professions 1 works
- 7 Theoretical and Computational Physics Condensed Matter Physics 1 works
- 8 Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 9 Nuclear Issues and Defense Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 10 Viral Infections and Vectors Infectious Diseases 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Clinton Foundation's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 13% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in New York
- Columbia University
- New York University
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- City University of New York
- Human Growth Foundation
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center
- Rockefeller University
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.