Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Nonprofit · Freiburg im Breisgau · Germany

Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung

cochrane.deROR OpenAlex
Research works
5
▼ 45% vs 2018-21
Citations
30
5.6 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
3.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
55%
world 40%
International
19%
world 18%
Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung

Not ranked overall: Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung work in?

In all years, 51% of research at Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung is in Health Sciences, 41% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Health Professions (28%), Medicine (24%), Decision Sciences (13%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Health Sciences.

Health Sciences: 3 fractional works · 51.4% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 27.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 22.8% of its workPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 4.7% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 23.7% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 5.4% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 4.1% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 3.2% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 41.3% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 13.1% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 1 fractional works · 13.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 12.9% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 6.5% of its workLaw: 0 fractional works · 6.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 7.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 7.3% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 6.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 3.7% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 0 fractional works · 7.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 7.3% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 7.3% of its workALL ITS WORKCochraneDeutschland…5fractional works, all years
Physical Sciences7%Health Sciences51%Social Sciences41%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 3 domains and 8 fields, with their numbers
    1. Health Professions127.7%
    2. Medicine123.7%
    1. Decision Sciences113.1%
    2. Social Sciences112.9%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance07.3%
    4. Psychology06.5%
    5. Arts and Humanities01.5%
    1. Mathematics07.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Health Professions: 10.28× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.84× its world share, 0 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 2.26× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 7.52× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.36× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 4.72× its world share, 0 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.52× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 10.3×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 7 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions10.28×0 works
  2. Decision Sciences7.52×0 works
  3. Psychology4.72×0 works
  4. Arts and Humanities2.26×0 works
  5. Medicine1.84×0 works
  6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.36×0 works
  7. Social Sciences0.52×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung?

The most cited paper from Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung is "Wie sich die Vertrauenswürdigkeit von Evidenz anhand von GRADE („grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation“) interpretieren lässt" (Lukas Schwingshackl, G. Rüschemeyer, Joerg J Meerpohl, 2021), with 35 citations. Next come "GRADE-Leitlinien: 18. Wie ROBINS-I und andere Instrumente zur Einschätzung des Risikos für Bias von nicht-randomisierten Studien verwendet werden sollten, um die Vertrauenswürdigkeit eines Evidenzkörpers zu bewerten" (19) and "Ist das Zeitalter der Kausalität vorbei?" (16).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Wie sich die Vertrauenswürdigkeit von Evidenz anhand von GRADE („grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation“) interpretieren lässt Lukas Schwingshackl, G. Rüschemeyer, Joerg J Meerpohl · Der Urologe 23 Feb 2021 35
2 GRADE-Leitlinien: 18. Wie ROBINS-I und andere Instrumente zur Einschätzung des Risikos für Bias von nicht-randomisierten Studien verwendet werden sollten, um die Vertrauenswürdigkeit eines Evidenzkörpers zu bewerten Johannes Morche, Simone Freitag, Frauke Hoffmann et al. · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 22 Jan 2020 19
3 Ist das Zeitalter der Kausalität vorbei? Gerd Antes · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen Open access 2016 16
4 [Is the age of causality over?]. Gerd Antes · PubMed 2016 13
5 GRADE-Leitlinien: 19. Bewertung der Vertrauenswürdigkeit der Evidenz für die Bedeutung von Endpunkten oder Werten und Präferenzen – Risiko für Bias und Indirektheit Laura Kaiser, Markus Hübscher, Olesja Rissling et al. · Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen Open access 18 Jan 2021 8
All 23 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Clinical practice guidelines implementation, Health and Medical Studies, Meta-analysis and systematic reviews and Health Policy Implementation Science.

Clinical practice guidel…0Clinical practice guidelines implementation: 0 fractional worksHealth and Medical Studies0Health and Medical Studies: 0 fractional worksMeta-analysis and systematic reviews: 0 fractional worksHealth Policy Implementation Science: 0 fractional worksEducational Strategies a…0Educational Strategies and Epistemologies: 0 fractional worksDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research: 0 fractional worksParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments: 0 fractional worksClimate Change Communica…0Climate Change Communication and Perception: 0 fractional worksMedia Influence and Health: 0 fractional worksMedical Practices and Rehabilitation: 0 fractional works
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeneral Health ProfessionsStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Clinical practice guidelines implementation Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  2. 2 Health and Medical Studies General Health Professions 0 works
  3. 3 Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 0 works
  4. 4 Health Policy Implementation Science General Health Professions 0 works
  5. 5 Educational Strategies and Epistemologies Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works
  6. 6 Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research Psychiatry and Mental health 0 works
  7. 7 Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments Neurology 0 works
  8. 8 Climate Change Communication and Perception Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  9. 9 Media Influence and Health Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  10. 10 Medical Practices and Rehabilitation Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available54.7%not open45.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors19.1%domestic only80.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 45% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting20202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Freiburg im Breisgau

All research institutions in Freiburg im Breisgau

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Cochrane Deutschland Stiftung. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.