Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Stavanger · Norway

Completion Technology Resources (Norway)

ctr.asROR OpenAlex
Research works
17
▲ 2530% vs 2018-21
Citations
85
4.9 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
5%
world 40%
International
23%
world 18%
Completion Technology Resources (Norway)

Not ranked overall: Completion Technology Resources (Norway) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Completion Technology Resources (Norway) work in?

In all years, 88% of research at Completion Technology Resources (Norway) is in Physical Sciences, 6% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (83%), Neuroscience (6%), Earth and Planetary Sciences (3%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 15 fractional works · 88.0% of its workEngineering: 14 fractional works · 82.6% of its workOcean Engineering: 8 fractional works · 48.7% of its workMechanical Engineering: 4 fractional works · 24.8% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 6.7% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 2.9% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workComputer Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 6.0% of its workNeuroscience: 1 fractional works · 5.7% of its workCognitive Neuroscience: 1 fractional works · 5.7% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.6% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workUrology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workALL ITS WORKCompletionTechnology…17fractional works, all years
Life Sciences6%Physical Sciences88%Health Sciences3%Social Sciences3%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 10 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering1482.6%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences02.9%
    3. Chemistry01.9%
    4. Computer Science00.6%
    1. Neuroscience15.7%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.2%
    1. Social Sciences02.0%
    2. Economics, Econometrics and Finance01.4%
    1. Medicine02.4%
    2. Health Professions00.2%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.15× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 11.74× its world share, 1 worksNeuroscienceChemistry: 4.05× its world share, 0 worksChemistryEngineering: 3.70× its world share, 3 worksEngineeringHealth Professions: 0.30× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.41× its world share, 0 worksMedicineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2.23× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Social Sciences: 0.38× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 11.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 8 fields, with their numbers
  1. Neuroscience11.74×1 works
  2. Chemistry4.05×0 works
  3. Engineering3.70×3 works
  4. Economics, Econometrics and Finance2.23×0 works
  5. Medicine0.41×0 works
  6. Social Sciences0.38×0 works
  7. Health Professions0.30×0 works
  8. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.15×0 works

What are the most cited papers from Completion Technology Resources (Norway)?

The most cited paper from Completion Technology Resources (Norway) is "Perforating Underbalanced Evolving Techniques (includes associated papers 13966 and 14140 )" (W.T. Bell, 1984), with 43 citations. Next come "Borehole Stresses: Plasticity and the Drilled Hole Effect" (22) and "Unconsolidated Sand Stabilization Through Wellbore Stress State Control" (8).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Perforating Underbalanced Evolving Techniques (includes associated papers 13966 and 14140 ) W.T. Bell · Journal of Petroleum Technology Oct 1984 43
2 Borehole Stresses: Plasticity and the Drilled Hole Effect Robert F. Mitchell, M.A. Goodman, E.T. Wood Conference paper 15 Mar 1987 22
3 Unconsolidated Sand Stabilization Through Wellbore Stress State Control George O. Suman Conference paper 28 Sep 1975 8
4 Geothermal Well Completions: A Critical Review Of Downhole Problems And Specialized Technology Needs Robert E. Snyder · SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Conference paper 23 Sep 1979 5
5 Adopting Operational Best Practices Helps to Rejuvenate a Brownfield Shut-In Observation Well By Deploying Autonomous Inflow Control Valve (AICV) Technology to Control Water, a Case Study A. Yermukhambetova, A. Al-Fatlawi, R. Brough et al. Conference paper 10 Jun 2025 3
All 22 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Completion Technology Resources (Norway) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, Drilling and Well Engineering and Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis.

EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces: 1 fractional worksReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods: 1 fractional worksDrilling and Well Engineering: 1 fractional worksHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis: 0 fractional worksOil and Gas Production Techniques: 0 fractional worksSecurity, Politics, and …0Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation: 0 fractional worksDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management: 0 fractional worksPetroleum Processing and Analysis: 0 fractional worksDigital Transformation in Law: 0 fractional worksLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies: 0 fractional works
Cognitive NeuroscienceOcean EngineeringMechanical EngineeringPolitical Science and International Relations4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces Cognitive Neuroscience 1 works
  2. 2 Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods Ocean Engineering 1 works
  3. 3 Drilling and Well Engineering Ocean Engineering 1 works
  4. 4 Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis Mechanical Engineering 0 works
  5. 5 Oil and Gas Production Techniques Ocean Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation Political Science and International Relations 0 works
  7. 7 Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 0 works
  8. 8 Petroleum Processing and Analysis Analytical Chemistry 0 works
  9. 9 Digital Transformation in Law General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 0 works
  10. 10 Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies Biomedical Engineering 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available4.7%not open95.3%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors22.6%domestic only77.4%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Completion Technology Resources (Norway)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 2530% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Completion Technology Resources (Norway) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000045% in 2024.

still counting0.00025%0.00050%0.00075%Completion Technology Resources (Norway)0.000036% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Completion Technology Resources (Norway) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Stavanger

All research institutions in Stavanger

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Completion Technology Resources (Norway). Posts are plain text and can be reported.