Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
University · Fort Wayne · United States

Concordia Theological Seminary

Research works
46
▼ 80% vs 2018-21
Citations
93
2.0 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
0.6%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
36%
world 40%
International
4%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Concordia Theological Seminary is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Concordia Theological Seminary work in?

In all years, 80% of research at Concordia Theological Seminary is in Social Sciences, 19% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Arts and Humanities (53%), Social Sciences (25%), Computer Science (18%). It does 3.2× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 37 fractional works · 80.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 25 fractional works · 53.2% of its workReligious studies: 8 fractional works · 16.5% of its workHistory: 6 fractional works · 12.6% of its workPhilosophy: 3 fractional works · 6.5% of its workArcheology: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workConservation: 2 fractional works · 4.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 2 fractional works · 3.6% of its workClassics: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workSocial Sciences: 12 fractional works · 25.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 4 fractional works · 9.7% of its workLibrary and Information Sciences: 2 fractional works · 4.8% of its workEducation: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workHealth: 2 fractional works · 3.9% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPhysical Sciences: 9 fractional works · 19.0% of its workComputer Science: 8 fractional works · 17.8% of its workInformation Systems: 8 fractional works · 16.3% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workComputational Mechanics: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKConcordiaTheological…46fractional works, all years
Life Sciences0%Physical Sciences19%Health Sciences0%Social Sciences80%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 9 fields, with their numbers
    1. Arts and Humanities2553.2%
    2. Social Sciences1225.3%
    3. Business, Management and Accounting11.4%
    4. Psychology00.5%
    1. Computer Science817.8%
    2. Engineering11.2%
    1. Health Professions00.4%
    2. Medicine00.1%
    1. Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Who are the top researchers at Concordia Theological Seminary?

Ranked on the quality score, William C. Weinrich, Charles A. Gieschen and Matthew Oseka lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Concordia Theological Seminary.

  1. 1 William C. Weinrich United States · #2,767,315 worldwide 81 citations · 16 works
  2. 2 Charles A. Gieschen United States · #3,826,479 worldwide 87 citations · 51 works
  3. 3 Matthew Oseka United States · #4,259,353 worldwide 5 citations · 16 works
  4. 4 Richard Allen Lammert United States · #4,657,147 worldwide 5 citations · 22 works
  5. 5 Peter Scaer United States · #5,143,379 worldwide 0 citations · 30 works
All ranked researchers at Concordia Theological Seminary

What are the most cited papers from Concordia Theological Seminary?

The most cited paper from Concordia Theological Seminary is "Christian Approval of Epicureanism" (Richard Jungkuntz, 1962), with 41 citations. Next come "Receptor screening technologies in the evaluation of Amazonian ethnomedicines with potential applications to cognitive deficits" (16) and "Beating in-order stalls with "flea-flicker" two-pass pipelining" (14).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Christian Approval of Epicureanism Richard Jungkuntz · Church History Sep 1962 41
2 Receptor screening technologies in the evaluation of Amazonian ethnomedicines with potential applications to cognitive deficits Dennis J. McKenna, Juan Manuel Ruiz, Thomas R. Hoye et al. · Journal of Ethnopharmacology 12 Jan 2011 16
3 Beating in-order stalls with "flea-flicker" two-pass pipelining Ronald D. Barnes, John W. Sias, Erik M. Nystrom et al. · IEEE Transactions on Computers 2006 14
4 Fathers, Heretics and Epicureans Richard Jungkuntz · The Journal of Ecclesiastical History Apr 1966 13
5 Self-perception and the Draw-a-Person Test David J. Ludwig · Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment Jun 1969 11
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Concordia Theological Seminary?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Theology, Church History, Cultural Identity, Digital Repositories, Reformation, Calvinism, Religious Controversy and Linked Data.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Theology9▲ 169×2 topics
  2. Church History6▲ 214×3 topics
  3. Cultural Identity6▲ 28×2 topics
  4. Digital Repositories5▲ 466×2 topics
  5. Reformation5▲ 255×2 topics
  6. Calvinism5▲ 287×1 topic
  7. Religious Controversy5▲ 287×1 topic
  8. Linked Data5▲ 146×1 topic
  9. Resource Description and Access5▲ 1152×1 topic
  10. Biblical Monotheism4▲ 209×1 topic
  11. Jewish Society4▲ 209×1 topic
  12. Religion4▲ 14×3 topics
  13. Academic Libraries3▲ 126×2 topics
  14. Spirituality2▲ 64×2 topics
  15. Cultural Transmission2▲ 52×2 topics
  16. Metaphysics2▲ 87×3 topics
  17. Christian-Muslim Relations2▲ 160×1 topic
  18. Civil Society2▲ 42×2 topics
  19. Gospel Translation2▲ 188×1 topic
  20. Health2▲ 11×2 topics
  21. Social Support2▲ 9.4×2 topics
  22. Diversity2▲ 23×2 topics
  23. African Christianity2▲ 148×2 topics
  24. Coping2▲ 93×1 topic
  25. Cultural History2▲ 28×2 topics
  26. Digital Textbooks2▲ 310×1 topic
  27. E-Books2▲ 310×1 topic
  28. Mental Health2▲ 3.5×1 topic
  29. Urban Development2▲ 12×3 topics
  30. Faith-Based Organizations2▲ 105×1 topic
  31. Lexicography2▲ 34×2 topics
  32. Social Services2▲ 89×1 topic
  33. Religious Education2▲ 36×2 topics
  34. Arabia1▲ 98×1 topic
  35. Byzantine1▲ 98×1 topic
  36. Linguistics1▲ 24×2 topics
  37. Global Christianity1▲ 157×1 topic
  38. Library Services1▲ 167×1 topic
  39. Short-Term Missions1▲ 157×1 topic
  40. Social Inclusion1▲ 77×1 topic

Which research topics does Concordia Theological Seminary publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Library Science and Administration, Library Collection Development and Digital Resources, Religious Education and Schools and Digital and Traditional Archives Management.

  1. 1 Library Science and Administration Library and Information Sciences 1 works
  2. 2 Library Collection Development and Digital Resources Information Systems 0 works
  3. 3 Religious Education and Schools Education 0 works
  4. 4 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 0 works
  5. 5 Reformation and Early Modern Christianity History 0 works
  6. 6 Religion, Theology, and Education Religious studies 0 works
  7. 7 Library Science and Information Systems Information Systems 0 works
  8. 8 German Literature and Culture Studies Literature and Literary Theory 0 works
  9. 9 Software Engineering Research Information Systems 0 works
  10. 10 Topic Modeling Artificial Intelligence 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available36.4%not open63.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors3.9%domestic only96.1%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Concordia Theological Seminary's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 80% lower than in 2018-2021.

1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Concordia Theological Seminary as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000089% in 2023.

0.00025%0.00050%0.00075%Concordia Theological Seminary0.000018% in 202419801990200020102020

Fractional works of Concordia Theological Seminary over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Fort Wayne

All research institutions in Fort Wayne

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Concordia Theological Seminary. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.