Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Fargo · United States

Dakota Technologies (United States)

Research works
20
▼ 46% vs 2018-21
Citations
188
9.5 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.8%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
27%
world 40%
International
14%
world 18%
Dakota Technologies (United States)

Not ranked overall: Dakota Technologies (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Dakota Technologies (United States) work in?

In all years, 65% of research at Dakota Technologies (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 20% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (21%), Chemistry (14%), Social Sciences (13%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 13 fractional works · 64.5% of its workEngineering: 4 fractional works · 20.7% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 2 fractional works · 7.9% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 2.2% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workChemistry: 3 fractional works · 13.6% of its workSpectroscopy: 2 fractional works · 10.1% of its workAnalytical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workInorganic Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 12.4% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 4.2% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.7% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 8.5% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1 fractional works · 7.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 1 fractional works · 2.9% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workInstrumentation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workBioengineering: 0 fractional works · 2.5% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 2.4% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSurfaces, Coatings and Films: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 20.3% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 13.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 11.3% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workReligious studies: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHealth Sciences: 3 fractional works · 14.0% of its workMedicine: 2 fractional works · 8.3% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 5.1% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 1 fractional works · 5.7% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 5.1% of its workRadiological and Ultrasound Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workCellular and Molecular Neuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKDakotaTechnologies…20fractional works, all years
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences65%Health Sciences14%Social Sciences20%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering420.7%
    2. Chemistry313.6%
    3. Environmental Science212.4%
    4. Computer Science28.5%
    5. Physics and Astronomy12.9%
    6. Chemical Engineering02.5%
    7. Earth and Planetary Sciences02.4%
    8. Materials Science00.9%
    9. Energy00.6%
    1. Social Sciences313.0%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting13.4%
    3. Decision Sciences01.7%
    4. Psychology01.7%
    5. Arts and Humanities00.6%
    1. Medicine28.3%
    2. Health Professions15.7%
    1. Neuroscience00.9%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

What are the most cited papers from Dakota Technologies (United States)?

The most cited paper from Dakota Technologies (United States) is "Dissecting the biochemical architecture and morphological release pathways of the human platelet extracellular vesiculome" (Silvia H. De Paoli, Tseday Z. Tegegn, Oumsalama K. Elhelu et al., 2018), with 53 citations. Next come "Laser-Induced Multidimensional Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Shpol'skii Matrixes with a Fiber-Optic Probe at Liquid Helium Temperature" (42) and "Measurement of uranium-236 in particles by secondary ion mass spectrometry" (33).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Dissecting the biochemical architecture and morphological release pathways of the human platelet extracellular vesiculome Silvia H. De Paoli, Tseday Z. Tegegn, Oumsalama K. Elhelu et al. · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences Open access 9 Feb 2018 53
2 Laser-Induced Multidimensional Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Shpol'skii Matrixes with a Fiber-Optic Probe at Liquid Helium Temperature Adam J. Bystol, Andrés D. Campiglia, Gregory D. Gillispie · Analytical Chemistry 2 Nov 2001 42
3 Measurement of uranium-236 in particles by secondary ion mass spectrometry David S. Simons, John D. Fassett · Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry Open access 2017 33
4 Time-Resolved Laser-Excited Shpol'skii Spectrometry with a Fiber-Optic Probe and ICCD Camera Adam J. Bystol, Andrés D. Campiglia, Gregory D. Gillispie · Applied Spectroscopy Jun 2000 33
5 Standard Representations for Sustainability Characterization of Industrial Processes Mahesh Mani, Jon Larborn, Björn Johansson et al. · Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering Open access 20 Jun 2016 31
All 42 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Dakota Technologies (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods, Groundwater flow and contamination studies, Geophysical Methods and Applications and Critical Race Theory in Education.

  1. 1 Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods Geophysics 0 works
  2. 2 Groundwater flow and contamination studies Environmental Engineering 0 works
  3. 3 Geophysical Methods and Applications Ocean Engineering 0 works
  4. 4 Critical Race Theory in Education Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  5. 5 Race, History, and American Society Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  6. 6 Hispanic-African Historical Relations Religious studies 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available26.8%not open73.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors14.5%domestic only85.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Dakota Technologies (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 46% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Dakota Technologies (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000019% in 2023.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%Dakota Technologies (United States)0.0000056% in 2025200020102020

Fractional works of Dakota Technologies (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Fargo

All research institutions in Fargo

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Dakota Technologies (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.