Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Greenbelt · United States

Environmental Leadership Program

Research works
6
fractional, all time
Citations
56
9.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
19.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
21%
world 40%
International
20%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: Environmental Leadership Program is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Environmental Leadership Program work in?

In all years, 51% of research at Environmental Leadership Program is in Physical Sciences, 46% in Social Sciences. Its largest fields are Environmental Science (49%), Social Sciences (31%), Decision Sciences (9%). It does 1.3× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 50.5% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 49.1% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 2 fractional works · 35.0% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 5.8% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 46.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 30.6% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 1 fractional works · 11.7% of its workEducation: 0 fractional works · 8.7% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 5.8% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 9.3% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 4.9% of its workStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty: 0 fractional works · 4.4% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 2.3% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workPsychology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.9% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workALL ITS WORKEnvironmentalLeadership…6fractional works, all years
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences51%Health Sciences1%Social Sciences46%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 9 fields, with their numbers
    1. Environmental Science349.1%
    2. Engineering01.4%
    1. Social Sciences230.6%
    2. Decision Sciences19.3%
    3. Economics, Econometrics and Finance02.3%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting01.9%
    5. Psychology01.9%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences03.0%
    1. Medicine00.5%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

What are the most cited papers from Environmental Leadership Program?

The most cited paper from Environmental Leadership Program is "Nutritional interventions to ameliorate the effect of endocrine disruptors on human reproductive health: A semi‐structured review from FIGO" (Gillian A. Corbett, Sadhbh Lee, Tracey J. Woodruff et al., 2022), with 29 citations. Next come "New Technologies for Public Sector Transformation" (27) and "Hazard Identification and Categorization for Waste Disposal Sites: Part 1 – an Integrated Approach Lacks" (7).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Nutritional interventions to ameliorate the effect of endocrine disruptors on human reproductive health: A semi‐structured review from FIGO Gillian A. Corbett, Sadhbh Lee, Tracey J. Woodruff et al. · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Open access 5 Feb 2022 29
2 New Technologies for Public Sector Transformation Silvana Rubino-Hallman, Nagy K. Hanna · Journal of E-Government 2007 27
3 Hazard Identification and Categorization for Waste Disposal Sites: Part 1 – an Integrated Approach Lacks Talib E. Butt, Nigel Mair, Kehinde O.K. Oduyemi · Risk Management Apr 2006 7
4 Hazard Identification and Categorization for Waste Disposal Sites: Part 2 – A Computer-Aided Procedure Talib E. Butt, Nigel Mair, Kehinde O.K. Oduyemi · Risk Management Jul 2006 3
5 The Need to Understand the “Black Box” of Presidential Appointments Mark A. Abramson · Public Administration Review 8 Oct 2012 2
All 10 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Environmental Leadership Program publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Folate and B Vitamins Research, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact.

  1. 1 Folate and B Vitamins Research Rheumatology 0 works
  2. 2 Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management Global and Planetary Change 0 works
  3. 3 Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0 works
  4. 4 Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 0 works
  5. 5 Economic and Environmental Valuation Economics and Econometrics 0 works
  6. 6 Land Use and Ecosystem Services Global and Planetary Change 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available21.2%not open78.8%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors19.7%domestic only80.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Environmental Leadership Program's research output changed?

2005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Greenbelt

All research institutions in Greenbelt

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Environmental Leadership Program. Posts are plain text and can be reported.