Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Auburn · United States

Forest Concepts (United States)

forestconcepts.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
17
▲ 143% vs 2018-21
Citations
96
5.7 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
82%
world 40%
International
10%
world 18%
Forest Concepts (United States)

Not ranked overall: Forest Concepts (United States) is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Forest Concepts (United States) work in?

In all years, 80% of research at Forest Concepts (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 14% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (57%), Environmental Science (15%), Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11%). It does 1.7× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 13 fractional works · 79.6% of its workEngineering: 10 fractional works · 57.0% of its workMechanics of Materials: 4 fractional works · 21.0% of its workComputational Mechanics: 2 fractional works · 12.5% of its workMechanical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 8.3% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 7.9% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 1 fractional works · 7.2% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 15.4% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 1 fractional works · 6.1% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workEnvironmental Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workBiomaterials: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workChemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEarth-Surface Processes: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workLife Sciences: 2 fractional works · 14.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 2 fractional works · 10.8% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.4% of its workForestry: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workSoil Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 2.0% of its workBiotechnology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 5.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workLinguistics and Language: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workMedicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workALL ITS WORKForest Concepts(United States)17fractional works, all years
Life Sciences14%Physical Sciences80%Health Sciences1%Social Sciences5%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 12 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering1057.0%
    2. Environmental Science315.4%
    3. Computer Science13.4%
    4. Materials Science02.0%
    5. Chemistry01.4%
    6. Earth and Planetary Sciences00.5%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences210.8%
    2. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology13.6%
    1. Social Sciences14.0%
    2. Business, Management and Accounting01.0%
    1. Nursing00.7%
    2. Medicine00.4%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.56× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.26× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Chemistry: 1.84× its world share, 0 worksChemistryComputer Science: 0.90× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 3.95× its world share, 5 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 2.61× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 1.22× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceNursing: 2.80× its world share, 0 worksNursingSocial Sciences: 0.65× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Engineering, 4.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 9 fields, with their numbers
  1. Engineering3.95×5 works
  2. Nursing2.80×0 works
  3. Environmental Science2.61×1 works
  4. Chemistry1.84×0 works
  5. Materials Science1.22×0 works
  6. Computer Science0.90×1 works
  7. Social Sciences0.65×1 works
  8. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.56×0 works
  9. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.26×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Forest Concepts (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, David N Lanning, Christopher J Lanning and James H Dooley lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Forest Concepts (United States).

  1. 1 David N Lanning United States · #5,151,932 worldwide 127 citations · 25 works
  2. 2 Christopher J Lanning United States · #5,260,721 worldwide 69 citations · 29 works
  3. 3 James H Dooley United States · #6,998,653 worldwide 285 citations · 80 works
All ranked researchers at Forest Concepts (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Forest Concepts (United States)?

The most cited paper from Forest Concepts (United States) is "A Wood‐Strand Material for Wind Erosion Control: Effects on Total Sediment Loss, PM10 Vertical Flux, and PM10 Loss" (Natalie S Copeland, Brenton S. Sharratt, J. Q. Wu et al., 2009), with 32 citations. Next come "Flowability of Crumbler Rotary Shear Size-Reduced Granular Biomass: An Experiment-Informed Modeling Study on the Angle of Repose" (22) and "Measurement of Transport Properties of Woody Biomass Feedstock Particles Before and After Pyrolysis by Numerical Analysis of X-Ray Tomographic Reconstructions" (21).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A Wood‐Strand Material for Wind Erosion Control: Effects on Total Sediment Loss, PM10 Vertical Flux, and PM10 Loss Natalie S Copeland, Brenton S. Sharratt, J. Q. Wu et al. · Journal of Environmental Quality 2009 32
2 Flowability of Crumbler Rotary Shear Size-Reduced Granular Biomass: An Experiment-Informed Modeling Study on the Angle of Repose Ahmed Hamed, Yidong Xia, Nepu Saha et al. · Frontiers in Energy Research Open access 5 May 2022 22
3 Measurement of Transport Properties of Woody Biomass Feedstock Particles Before and After Pyrolysis by Numerical Analysis of X-Ray Tomographic Reconstructions Meagan Crowley, Hariswaran Sitaraman, Jordan Lee Klinger et al. · Frontiers in Energy Research Open access 28 Apr 2022 21
4 Genetic Performance and Maximizing Genetic Gain Through Direct and Indirect Selection in Cherrybark Oak Joshua P. Adams, J. P. Adams, Randall J. Rousseau et al. · Silvae genetica/Silvae Genetica Open access Dec 2007 20
5 New strategy for liquefying corn stover pellets António dos Santos, Jonathan C. Overton, Ryan Szeto et al. · Bioresource Technology Open access 15 Aug 2021 17
All 40 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does Forest Concepts (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Forest Biomass Utilization and Management, Granular flow and fluidized beds, Biofuel production and bioconversion and Landslides and related hazards.

Forest Biomass Utilizati…2Forest Biomass Utilization and Management: 2 fractional worksGranular flow and fluidi…1Granular flow and fluidized beds: 1 fractional worksBiofuel production and b…1Biofuel production and bioconversion: 1 fractional worksLandslides and related h…0Landslides and related hazards: 0 fractional worksMineral Processing and G…0Mineral Processing and Grinding: 0 fractional worksSoil Mechanics and Vehic…0Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics: 0 fractional worksLinguistic Variation and Morphology: 0 fractional worksDigital Communication and Language: 0 fractional worksMultilingual Education and Policy: 0 fractional worksMachine Learning in Materials Science: 0 fractional works
Mechanics of MaterialsComputational MechanicsBiomedical EngineeringManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law5 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Forest Biomass Utilization and Management Mechanics of Materials 2 works
  2. 2 Granular flow and fluidized beds Computational Mechanics 1 works
  3. 3 Biofuel production and bioconversion Biomedical Engineering 1 works
  4. 4 Landslides and related hazards Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 0 works
  5. 5 Mineral Processing and Grinding Mechanical Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 Linguistic Variation and Morphology Linguistics and Language 0 works
  8. 8 Digital Communication and Language Human-Computer Interaction 0 works
  9. 9 Multilingual Education and Policy Linguistics and Language 0 works
  10. 10 Machine Learning in Materials Science Materials Chemistry 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available81.8%not open18.2%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors9.7%domestic only90.3%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Forest Concepts (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 143% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Forest Concepts (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000018% in 2024.

still counting0.00010%0.00020%Forest Concepts (United States)0.0000085% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Forest Concepts (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Auburn

All research institutions in Auburn

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Forest Concepts (United States). Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.