- Research works
- 32 ▼ 100% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 1.2k 37.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 0.0% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 21% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Forest History Society is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which keywords describe research at Forest History Society?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Sustainability, Conservation, Environmental Movement, Renewable Energy, Biodiversity Conservation, Climate Change, History and Climate Change Impacts.
- Rangeland Degradation
- Marketing
- Branding
- Oral History
- Wildfire Activity
- Politics
- Ethics
- Nationalism
- Community
- Society
- Epidemiology
- Innovation
- Traditional Irrigation
- Ecosystem Services
- Gender
- Climate Change Impacts
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Renewable Energy
- Conservation
- Sustainability
- Environmental Movement
- Climate Change
- History
- Forest Carbon Sequestration
- Colonialism
- Identity
- Water Sustainability
- Culture
- Scientific History
- Technological Development
- Memory
- Religion
- Forest Fires
- Vietnam
- Narratives
- Biotechnology
- Genetically Modified Crops
- Pastoralists
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 38 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 38 words, with their numbers
- Sustainability9▲ 17×3 topics
- Conservation9▲ 59×3 topics
- Environmental Movement8▲ 1338×1 topic
- Renewable Energy8▲ 26×1 topic
- Climate Change5▲ 5.5×9 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation4▲ 52×3 topics
- History4▲ 15×7 topics
- Climate Change Impacts3▲ 76×1 topic
- Forest Carbon Sequestration3▲ 431×1 topic
- Gender3▲ 18×4 topics
- Colonialism3▲ 18×5 topics
- Ecosystem Services2▲ 23×2 topics
- Identity2▲ 9.6×4 topics
- Traditional Irrigation2▲ 573×1 topic
- Water Sustainability2▲ 573×1 topic
- Innovation2▲ 6.9×2 topics
- Culture2▲ 11×2 topics
- Epidemiology2▲ 1.31×4 topics
- Scientific History2▲ 105×1 topic
- Society2▲ 23×2 topics
- Technological Development2▲ 105×1 topic
- Community2▲ 46×2 topics
- Memory2▲ 20×2 topics
- Nationalism2▲ 8.2×4 topics
- Religion2▲ 8.1×2 topics
- Ethics1▲ 8.7×3 topics
- Forest Fires1▲ 117×1 topic
- Politics1▲ 16×1 topic
- Vietnam1▲ 103×1 topic
- Wildfire Activity1▲ 117×1 topic
- Narratives1▲ 443×1 topic
- Oral History1▲ 541×1 topic
- Biotechnology1▲ 32×1 topic
- Branding1▲ 223×1 topic
- Genetically Modified Crops1▲ 250×1 topic
- Marketing1▲ 53×1 topic
- Pastoralists1▲ 129×1 topic
- Rangeland Degradation1▲ 129×1 topic
Which research topics does Forest History Society publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Wood Treatment and Properties, Forest ecology and management and Bamboo properties and applications.
- 1 Wood Treatment and Properties Building and Construction 0 works
- 2 Forest ecology and management Nature and Landscape Conservation 0 works
- 3 Bamboo properties and applications Plant Science 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Forest History Society's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 100% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Durham
- Duke University
- Duke Medical Center
- Duke University Hospital
- Research Triangle Park Foundation
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- RTI International
- North Carolina Central University
- Durham VA Medical Center
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.