GeoMechanics Technologies (United States)
In research, GeoMechanics Technologies (United States) stands highest in Physical Sciences (#20,436 of 21,541 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, all time
- #39,474 of 42,892
- Rank in United States
- #8,249 of 8,685
- Research works
- 145 ▲ 68% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 2.5k 17.4 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 2.1% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 21% world 28%
What is GeoMechanics Technologies (United States) known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical SciencesDomain | #20,436 of 21,541 | 18.5% | 133 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where GeoMechanics Technologies (United States) sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Earth and Planetary Sciences, 5.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 5.7×
- Engineering 3.5×
- Environmental Science 2.5×
- Business, Management and Accounting 2.0×
- Mathematics 1.1×
- Health Professions 0.8×
- Energy 0.7×
- Medicine 0.4×
- Arts and Humanities 0.3×
- Social Sciences 0.3×
- Psychology 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at GeoMechanics Technologies (United States)?
Ranked on the composite score, Bruno lead among researchers whose main affiliation is GeoMechanics Technologies (United States).
- 1 Bruno United States · #1,264,871 worldwide 28 citations · 54 works
Which keywords describe research at GeoMechanics Technologies (United States)?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Hydraulic Fracturing, Fracture Propagation, Shale Gas Reservoirs, CO2 Sequestration, Nanoparticles, Vibration Analysis, Rheological Properties and Drilling Fluids.
- Sedimentology
- Non-Destructive Testing
- Plate Tectonics
- Plate Boundaries
- Reactive Transport
- Tunnel
- Subduction
- Geomechanical Processes
- Well Placement
- Wave Propagation
- Optimization
- Full-Waveform Tomography
- Elastic Properties
- Brittle Failure
- Fracture
- Rock Mechanics
- Drilling Fluids
- Vibration Analysis
- CO2 Sequestration
- Fracture Propagation
- Hydraulic Fracturing
- Shale Gas Reservoirs
- Nanoparticles
- Rheological Properties
- Well Integrity
- Dynamic Behavior
- Acoustic Emission
- Numerical Modelling
- Geophysical Imaging
- Seismic Waveform Inversion
- Data Assimilation
- Ensemble Kalman Filter
- Seismicity
- Pendulum Waves
- Liquefaction
- Risk Assessment
- Earthquakes
- GIS-based Modeling
- Tomography
- Ground-Penetrating Radar
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Hydraulic Fracturing21▲ 124×2 topics
- Fracture Propagation21▲ 235×1 topic
- Shale Gas Reservoirs21▲ 235×1 topic
- CO2 Sequestration20▲ 100×4 topics
- Nanoparticles18▲ 9.3×5 topics
- Vibration Analysis18▲ 40×3 topics
- Rheological Properties18▲ 76×2 topics
- Drilling Fluids17▲ 230×1 topic
- Well Integrity17▲ 230×1 topic
- Rock Mechanics13▲ 83×2 topics
- Dynamic Behavior9▲ 62×2 topics
- Fracture9▲ 64×2 topics
- Acoustic Emission9▲ 132×2 topics
- Brittle Failure9▲ 156×1 topic
- Numerical Modelling9▲ 156×1 topic
- Elastic Properties8▲ 58×2 topics
- Geophysical Imaging8▲ 75×2 topics
- Full-Waveform Tomography8▲ 114×1 topic
- Seismic Waveform Inversion8▲ 114×1 topic
- Optimization5▲ 6.5×3 topics
- Data Assimilation5▲ 19×2 topics
- Wave Propagation5▲ 28×3 topics
- Ensemble Kalman Filter5▲ 29×1 topic
- Well Placement5▲ 62×1 topic
- Seismicity5▲ 86×2 topics
- Geomechanical Processes4▲ 107×1 topic
- Pendulum Waves4▲ 107×1 topic
- Subduction4▲ 31×3 topics
- Liquefaction4▲ 38×2 topics
- Tunnel4▲ 38×2 topics
- Risk Assessment4▲ 4.9×4 topics
- Reactive Transport4▲ 51×2 topics
- Earthquakes4▲ 34×1 topic
- Plate Boundaries4▲ 34×1 topic
- GIS-based Modeling4▲ 31×2 topics
- Plate Tectonics3▲ 11×2 topics
- Tomography3▲ 8.7×2 topics
- Non-Destructive Testing3▲ 19×2 topics
- Ground-Penetrating Radar3▲ 44×1 topic
- Sedimentology3▲ 44×1 topic
Which research topics does GeoMechanics Technologies (United States) publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis, Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies, Landslides and related hazards and FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis Mechanical Engineering 1 works
- 2 Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies Automotive Engineering 1 works
- 3 Landslides and related hazards Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
- 4 FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance Management Information Systems 0 works
- 5 Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques Geophysics 0 works
- 6 Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization Civil and Structural Engineering 0 works
- 7 Drilling and Well Engineering Ocean Engineering 0 works
- 8 Geological Modeling and Analysis Geochemistry and Petrology 0 works
- 9 Rock Mechanics and Modeling Mechanics of Materials 0 works
- 10 Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena Environmental Chemistry 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has GeoMechanics Technologies (United States)'s research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 68% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Monrovia
- Children's Oncology Group
- Tanner Research (United States)
- ChromoLogic (United States)
- California Library Association
- Xencor (United States)
- AeroVironment (United States)
- Photon Spot (United States)
- Oak Crest Institute of Science
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.