Science Explorer Interactive view Map

Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization

Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization is a research topic within Civil and Structural Engineering. Science Explorer counts 37k research works in it since 1950. 15.3% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.

This cluster of papers focuses on the mechanical behavior, strength, and reinforcement techniques of soil, particularly in the context of geosynthetics, fiber reinforcement, stone columns, sand mixtures, clay stabilization, and embankment construction. The research covers topics such as bearing capacity, numerical analysis, and shear strength of reinforced soils.

  • Soil Reinforcement
  • Geosynthetics
  • Fiber Reinforcement
  • Stone Columns
  • Sand Mixtures
  • Clay Stabilization
  • Bearing Capacity
  • Numerical Analysis
  • Shear Strength
  • Embankment Construction
Research works
37k
fractional, since 1950
In the world top 10%
5.7k
per year above
Top-10% rate
15.3%
share of its works in the world top 10%
Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
+59%
the tick is no change

Which countries lead Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization research?

By volume, China and India publish the most (3k and 1.3k works in 2022–2025).

By volume, 2022–2025

  1. 1 China 3k works
  2. 2 India 1.3k works
  3. 3 United States 568 works
  4. 4 Indonesia 542 works
  5. 5 Iran 303 works
  6. 6 Japan 282 works
  7. 7 Iraq 250 works
  8. 8 Türkiye 245 works
  9. 9 Brazil 228 works
  10. 10 Australia 181 works

How concentrated that is

The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.

China: 43.9%India: 18.4%United States: 8.2%Indonesia: 7.9%6 others listed: 21.6%44%largest
China3,030 · 43.9%India1,268 · 18.4%United States568 · 8.2%Indonesia542 · 7.9%6 others listed1,489 · 21.6%

Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.

Which institutions lead Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization research?

By volume in 2022–2025, Tongji University publishes the most Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization research, followed by Hohai University and Central South University.

Who are the leading researchers in Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization?

The most-cited researchers publishing on Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization include David R. Smith and Amir H. Gandomi.

  1. 1 David R. Smith United States 6.3k citations
  2. 2 Amir H. Gandomi Australia 2.5k citations

Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.

Where is Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization research done?

The largest centres of Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization research in 2022–2025 are Beijing (China), Nanjing (China), Shanghai (China) and Wuhan (China). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Roorkee.

Largest cities, 2022–2025

  1. 1 Beijing China 411 works
  2. 2 Nanjing China 240 works
  3. 3 Shanghai China 238 works
  4. 4 Wuhan China 173 works
  5. 5 Changsha China 146 works
  6. 6 Hangzhou China 138 works
  7. 7 Xi'an China 131 works
  8. 8 Tehran Iran 126 works
  9. 9 Baghdad Iraq 113 works
  10. 10 Chengdu China 111 works

Where it is the local speciality

  1. RoorkeeIN · 65.1 works15×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization than the world average.

See Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization on the map

Where is the best place to study Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization?

Among universities, judged by research, University of Guilan, National Institute of Technology Agartala and Tongji University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.

0%20%40%60%mean 21.93%fractional works in this node (log) →share in the world top 10% →University of Guilan: 23, 47.8%National Institute of Technology Agartala: 18, 33.9%Tongji University: 126, 16.5%Thammasat University: 17, 29.6%Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee: 56, 9.8%Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati: 30, 9.4%Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad: 21, 12.5%National Institute of Technology Patna: 25, 24.6%Hohai University: 91, 12.7%Beijing University of Technology: 49, 22.5%University of GuilanNational Institute o…Thammasat UniversityTongji University
above the meannear itbelow it

One dot per university in the table below. The upper left is the interesting corner: small places doing unusually strong work.

#UniversityScoreTop 10%SpecialisationWorksGrowth
1 University of GuilanIran 80.347.8%19.7×23 +284.8%
2 National Institute of Technology AgartalaIndia 63.133.9%30.7×18 +111.1%
3 Tongji UniversityChina 61.116.5%11.0×126 +0.9%
4 Thammasat UniversityThailand 58.929.6%11.3×17
5 Indian Institute of Technology RoorkeeIndia 57.59.8%13.7×56 +125.6%
6 Indian Institute of Technology GuwahatiIndia 56.99.4%9.9×30 +217.8%
7 Indian Institute of Technology HyderabadIndia 56.712.5%9.8×21 +212.1%
8 National Institute of Technology PatnaIndia 55.624.6%19.2×25
9 Hohai UniversityChina 55.212.7%18.3×91 -15.3%
10 Beijing University of TechnologyChina 54.422.5%7.7×49 +56.3%

Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.

Is Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization research growing?

Output in 2018–2022 was 59% higher than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2024. The fastest-growing topics are Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization.

19801990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Which topics inside it are moving

Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.