Institute for Global Environmental Strategies
In research, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies stands highest in Environmental Science (#1,946 of 3,551 worldwide) and Physical Sciences (#8,251 of 12,888 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Science — Global and Planetary Change is 26.9× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #14,192 of 28,054 · #6,284 all time
- Rank in Japan
- #372 of 1,070
- Research works
- 667 ▲ 91% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 33k 49.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 35.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 44% world 28%
What is Institute for Global Environmental Strategies known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental ScienceField | #1,946 of 3,551 | 34.0% | 80 | #1501 | |
| Physical SciencesDomain | #8,251 of 12,888 | 33.8% | 98 | #3856 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Institute for Global Environmental Strategies sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Institute for Global Environmental Strategies specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Global and Planetary Change takes 26.9× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Global and Planetary ChangeSubfield · 29.4 works27×
- Environmental ScienceField · 79.8 works11×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Environmental Science, 11.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Environmental Science 11.1×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 2.1×
- Energy 1.7×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.6×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.6×
- Social Sciences 1.1×
- Nursing 0.9×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.8×
- Decision Sciences 0.5×
- Engineering 0.4×
- Health Professions 0.3×
- Computer Science 0.2×
- Mathematics 0.2×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Psychology 0.1×
- Chemistry 0.0×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.0×
Who are the top researchers at Institute for Global Environmental Strategies?
Ranked on the composite score, Xianbing Liu, Brian Alan Johnson and Janya Sang-Arun lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
- 1 Xianbing Liu Japan · #149,748 worldwide 259 citations · 50 works
- 2 Brian Alan Johnson Japan · #240,396 worldwide 155 citations · 41 works
- 3 Janya Sang-Arun Japan · #325,428 worldwide 35 citations · 39 works
- 4 Mustafa Moinuddin Japan · #667,305 worldwide 21 citations · 30 works
- 5 Magnus Bengtsson Japan · #876,514 worldwide 48 citations · 49 works
- 6 Xin Zhou Japan · #927,511 worldwide 43 citations · 29 works
- 7 Yatsuka Kataoka Japan · #1,003,820 worldwide 2 citations · 22 works
- 8 Binaya Raj Shivakoti Japan · #1,081,013 worldwide 28 citations · 27 works
- 9 Premakumara Jagath Dickella Gamaralalage Japan · #1,106,175 worldwide 20 citations · 34 works
- 10 Pankaj Kumar Japan · #1,154,079 worldwide 70 citations · 43 works
Which keywords describe research at Institute for Global Environmental Strategies?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Climate Change, Sustainability, Remote Sensing, Land Use Change, Biodiversity Conservation, Ecosystem Services, Urbanization and Renewable Energy.
- Human Health
- Migration
- Model Evaluation
- Resettlement
- Resilience
- Surface Water Mapping
- Economic Growth
- Satellite Imagery
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions
- Sea-Level Rise
- Water Resources
- Recycling
- Waste Management
- Hydrological Modeling
- Social-Ecological Systems
- Global Warming
- Renewable Energy
- Ecosystem Services
- Land Use Change
- Sustainability
- Climate Change
- Remote Sensing
- Biodiversity Conservation
- Environmental Impact
- Urbanization
- Vulnerability
- Environmental Policy
- Global Impact
- Human-Nature Interactions
- Spatial Dynamics
- Risk Perception
- Flood Risk
- Adaptation
- Sustainability Assessment
- Flood Inundation Modeling
- Life Cycle Assessment
- Sediment Transport
- Climate Change Adaptation
- Environmental Refugees
- Metal Recovery
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Climate Change47▲ 12×47 topics
- Sustainability27▲ 7.8×33 topics
- Remote Sensing18▲ 10.0×20 topics
- Land Use Change18▲ 40×7 topics
- Biodiversity Conservation17▲ 32×8 topics
- Ecosystem Services16▲ 28×9 topics
- Environmental Impact14▲ 5.7×24 topics
- Renewable Energy13▲ 6.4×20 topics
- Urbanization13▲ 22×6 topics
- Global Warming12▲ 20×9 topics
- Vulnerability12▲ 36×6 topics
- Social-Ecological Systems11▲ 58×2 topics
- Environmental Policy11▲ 39×3 topics
- Hydrological Modeling10▲ 29×3 topics
- Global Impact10▲ 40×2 topics
- Waste Management9▲ 15×5 topics
- Human-Nature Interactions9▲ 67×1 topic
- Recycling9▲ 16×6 topics
- Spatial Dynamics9▲ 67×1 topic
- Water Resources7▲ 21×7 topics
- Risk Perception7▲ 18×2 topics
- Sea-Level Rise7▲ 42×3 topics
- Flood Risk7▲ 58×2 topics
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions7▲ 17×6 topics
- Adaptation6▲ 16×3 topics
- Satellite Imagery6▲ 34×3 topics
- Sustainability Assessment6▲ 31×6 topics
- Economic Growth6▲ 5.0×9 topics
- Flood Inundation Modeling6▲ 57×1 topic
- Surface Water Mapping6▲ 57×1 topic
- Life Cycle Assessment5▲ 13×5 topics
- Resilience5▲ 7.6×3 topics
- Sediment Transport5▲ 22×3 topics
- Resettlement5▲ 38×3 topics
- Climate Change Adaptation4▲ 18×2 topics
- Model Evaluation4▲ 25×2 topics
- Environmental Refugees4▲ 137×1 topic
- Migration4▲ 8.4×1 topic
- Metal Recovery4▲ 14×2 topics
- Human Health4▲ 17×2 topics
Which research topics does Institute for Global Environmental Strategies publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration and Recycling and Waste Management Techniques.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Land Use and Ecosystem Services Global and Planetary Change 9 works
- 2 Flood Risk Assessment and Management Global and Planetary Change 6 works
- 3 Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration Sociology and Political Science 4 works
- 4 Recycling and Waste Management Techniques Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 4 works
- 5 Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management Global and Planetary Change 4 works
- 6 Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies Water Science and Technology 4 works
- 7 Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 3 works
- 8 Urban Green Space and Health Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 3 works
- 9 Municipal Solid Waste Management Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 3 works
- 10 Sustainability and Climate Change Governance Global and Planetary Change 2 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Institute for Global Environmental Strategies's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 91% higher than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Hayama
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.