International Institute for Strategic Studies
In research, International Institute for Strategic Studies stands highest in Political Science and International Relations (#1,220 of 2,376 worldwide), Social Sciences (#8,765 of 16,945 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#5,447 of 10,206 worldwide), over all time.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #17,877 of 28,054 · #27,172 all time
- Rank in United States
- #2,564 of 4,192
- Research works
- 537 ▼ 26% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 4.1k 7.6 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.4% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 32% world 28%
What is International Institute for Strategic Studies known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Political Science and International RelationsSubfield | #1,220 of 2,376 | 28.3% | 162 | |
| Social SciencesDomain | #8,765 of 16,945 | 26.3% | 419 | |
| Social SciencesField | #5,447 of 10,206 | 27.2% | 290 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where International Institute for Strategic Studies sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 4.7×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 3.7×
- Social Sciences 3.4×
- Arts and Humanities 2.6×
- Energy 1.9×
- Psychology 1.3×
- Decision Sciences 1.2×
- Computer Science 0.7×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.6×
- Environmental Science 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 0.4×
- Materials Science 0.4×
- Health Professions 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.3×
- Engineering 0.2×
- Chemistry 0.1×
- Nursing 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
- Medicine 0.1×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at International Institute for Strategic Studies?
Ranked on the composite score, Ivo H. Daalder, Derek Leebaert and Josef Joffe lead among researchers whose main affiliation is International Institute for Strategic Studies.
- 1 Ivo H. Daalder United States · #103,595 worldwide 86 citations · 30 works
- 2 Derek Leebaert United States · #135,355 worldwide 81 citations · 32 works
- 3 Josef Joffe United States · #291,260 worldwide 48 citations · 25 works
- 4 Raymond Carr United States · #390,891 worldwide 15 citations · 25 works
- 5 Theo Sommer United States · #519,101 worldwide 0 citations · 27 works
- 6 Hans Binnendijk United States · #596,964 worldwide 6 citations · 20 works
- 7 Dana H. Allin United States · #820,438 worldwide 12 citations · 20 works
- 8 John Borawski United States · #910,034 worldwide 7 citations · 18 works
- 9 Douglas Barrie United States · #931,146 worldwide 1 citations · 19 works
- 10 David Santoro United States · #1,024,732 worldwide 5 citations · 17 works
Which keywords describe research at International Institute for Strategic Studies?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Globalization, International Law, Global Governance, Sustainable Development, Diplomacy, International Relations, Conflict and International Institutions.
- Russia
- Predictive Analytics
- National Security
- Digital Sovereignty
- Migration
- Colonialism
- Public Policy
- Environmental Management
- Refugees
- Organizational Performance
- Democracy
- Information Warfare
- Digital Transformation
- Security
- International Institutions
- Economic Development
- Conflict
- International Relations
- Global Governance
- International Law
- Globalization
- Sustainable Development
- Diplomacy
- Human Rights
- Artificial Intelligence
- Economic Growth
- Power
- Sustainability
- Geopolitics
- Global Economy
- Supply Chain Management
- Entrepreneurship
- Terrorism
- Gender
- Social Capital
- Panel Data Analysis
- Regional Development
- Hybrid Warfare
- Political Economy
- Reconstruction
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization12▲ 8.1×20 topics
- International Law9▲ 38×8 topics
- Sustainable Development6▲ 5.5×19 topics
- Global Governance6▲ 36×6 topics
- Diplomacy6▲ 77×3 topics
- International Relations5▲ 27×7 topics
- Human Rights4▲ 5.3×11 topics
- Conflict4▲ 32×4 topics
- Artificial Intelligence4▲ 3.7×9 topics
- Economic Development4▲ 6.3×7 topics
- Economic Growth4▲ 5.8×7 topics
- International Institutions4▲ 234×1 topic
- Power4▲ 70×1 topic
- Security4▲ 7.6×3 topics
- Sustainability4▲ 2.0×11 topics
- Digital Transformation4▲ 9.1×5 topics
- Geopolitics3▲ 30×5 topics
- Information Warfare3▲ 141×2 topics
- Global Economy3▲ 29×4 topics
- Democracy3▲ 10×7 topics
- Supply Chain Management3▲ 4.0×3 topics
- Organizational Performance3▲ 15×4 topics
- Entrepreneurship2▲ 8.7×6 topics
- Refugees2▲ 25×4 topics
- Terrorism2▲ 69×2 topics
- Environmental Management2▲ 7.3×4 topics
- Gender2▲ 5.5×8 topics
- Public Policy2▲ 5.9×6 topics
- Social Capital2▲ 5.5×5 topics
- Colonialism2▲ 6.0×6 topics
- Panel Data Analysis2▲ 17×3 topics
- Migration2▲ 7.6×4 topics
- Regional Development2▲ 7.1×4 topics
- Digital Sovereignty2▲ 57×2 topics
- Hybrid Warfare2▲ 145×1 topic
- National Security2▲ 44×2 topics
- Political Economy2▲ 9.6×4 topics
- Predictive Analytics2▲ 21×2 topics
- Reconstruction2▲ 14×2 topics
- Russia2▲ 56×1 topic
Which research topics does International Institute for Strategic Studies publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: International Relations and Foreign Policy, European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies, FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 International Relations and Foreign Policy Political Science and International Relations 4 works
- 2 European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 3 FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance Management Information Systems 2 works
- 4 Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 5 Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 6 Defense, Military, and Policy Studies Economics and Econometrics 2 works
- 7 Organizational and Employee Performance Artificial Intelligence 2 works
- 8 Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies Political Science and International Relations 2 works
- 9 Environmental Sustainability and Technology Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1 works
- 10 Philippine History and Culture Anthropology 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has International Institute for Strategic Studies's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 26% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Washington D.C.
- Georgetown University
- George Washington University
- United States Naval Research Laboratory
- Agricultural Research Service
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs
- United States Department of Agriculture
- American University
- Environmental Protection Agency
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.