Library of Congress
In research, Library of Congress stands highest in Social Sciences (#8,284 of 10,521 worldwide), 2022–2025. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Arts and Humanities — Arts and Humanities is 10.4× its share of world research.
- World rank, 2022–2025
- #20,553 of 28,054 · #8,368 all time
- Rank in United States
- #3,028 of 4,192
- Research works
- 2.8k ▼ 34% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 12k 4.2 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 11.4% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 20% world 28%
What is Library of Congress known for in research?
The fields where it stands highest, 2022–2025, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.
| Field | World rank | Where that sits | Top-10% rate | Works | All time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social SciencesDomain | #8,284 of 10,521 | 12.0% | 73 | #1288 |
Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Library of Congress sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).
What does Library of Congress specialise in?
Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Arts and Humanities takes 10.4× the share of its output that it takes of world research.
- Arts and HumanitiesField · 30.4 works10×
Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 10.4×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Arts and Humanities 10.4×
- Social Sciences 2.5×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2.1×
- Decision Sciences 2.0×
- Computer Science 1.3×
- Psychology 0.9×
- Nursing 0.9×
- Earth and Planetary Sciences 0.9×
- Health Professions 0.7×
- Dentistry 0.7×
- Business, Management and Accounting 0.6×
- Mathematics 0.5×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.3×
- Neuroscience 0.3×
- Medicine 0.3×
- Environmental Science 0.3×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.3×
- Physics and Astronomy 0.3×
- Engineering 0.1×
- Materials Science 0.1×
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Library of Congress?
Ranked on the composite score, Arthur W. Hummel, Lewis Hanke and Salīm Tamārī lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Library of Congress.
- 1 Arthur W. Hummel United States · #48,378 worldwide 116 citations · 38 works
- 2 Lewis Hanke United States · #57,034 worldwide 68 citations · 72 works
- 3 Salīm Tamārī United States · #109,321 worldwide 42 citations · 42 works
- 4 Howard F. Cline United States · #118,619 worldwide 44 citations · 54 works
- 5 Robert W. Schaaf United States · #171,706 worldwide 145 citations · 20 works
- 6 Harold C. Relyea United States · #233,012 worldwide 45 citations · 46 works
- 7 Halford L. Hoskins United States · #240,902 worldwide 36 citations · 33 works
- 8 Larry A. Niksch United States · #245,317 worldwide 16 citations · 35 works
- 9 Leszek Kołakowski United States · #311,112 worldwide 15 citations · 36 works
- 10 James B. Childs United States · #328,287 worldwide 3 citations · 38 works
Which keywords describe research at Library of Congress?
By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: History, Identity, Cultural Heritage, Globalization, Nationalism, Literature, Colonialism and Metadata Standards.
- Social History
- Memory
- Ecomusicology
- Digital Repositories
- Museum Environments
- Sea-Level Rise
- Colonial Spanish America
- Language Policy
- Data Citation
- Cultural Identity
- Security
- Ethics
- Feminism
- Ethnomusicology
- Social Justice
- Archives
- Metadata Standards
- Literature
- Identity
- History
- Globalization
- Cultural Heritage
- Nationalism
- Colonialism
- Conservation
- Digital Preservation
- Cultural Exchange
- Gender
- International Relations
- Qualitative Research
- Democracy
- Empire
- Culture
- Visual Culture
- Indigenous History
- Environmental Monitoring
- Academic Libraries
- Soviet Union
- Environmental Sustainability
- National Identity
Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Globalization7▲ 3.6×21 topics
- History7▲ 9.7×18 topics
- Cultural Heritage6▲ 11×9 topics
- Identity6▲ 8.4×20 topics
- Nationalism5▲ 10×10 topics
- Literature4▲ 7.9×10 topics
- Colonialism4▲ 8.1×13 topics
- Metadata Standards4▲ 194×2 topics
- Conservation4▲ 8.5×3 topics
- Archives4▲ 289×1 topic
- Digital Preservation4▲ 248×1 topic
- Social Justice3▲ 5.7×6 topics
- Cultural Exchange3▲ 25×2 topics
- Ethnomusicology3▲ 82×2 topics
- Gender3▲ 6.0×14 topics
- Feminism3▲ 11×6 topics
- International Relations3▲ 12×6 topics
- Ethics3▲ 6.0×5 topics
- Qualitative Research3▲ 3.3×9 topics
- Security3▲ 4.4×5 topics
- Democracy3▲ 7.8×7 topics
- Cultural Identity3▲ 5.1×8 topics
- Empire3▲ 32×4 topics
- Data Citation3▲ 57×2 topics
- Culture2▲ 4.7×7 topics
- Language Policy2▲ 18×2 topics
- Visual Culture2▲ 44×2 topics
- Colonial Spanish America2▲ 188×1 topic
- Indigenous History2▲ 188×1 topic
- Sea-Level Rise2▲ 20×3 topics
- Environmental Monitoring2▲ 5.7×1 topic
- Museum Environments2▲ 108×1 topic
- Academic Libraries2▲ 100×3 topics
- Digital Repositories2▲ 71×2 topics
- Soviet Union2▲ 34×3 topics
- Ecomusicology2▲ 82×1 topic
- Environmental Sustainability2▲ 12×1 topic
- Memory2▲ 7.7×7 topics
- National Identity2▲ 16×2 topics
- Social History2▲ 22×4 topics
Which research topics does Library of Congress publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: Digital and Traditional Archives Management, Latin American history and culture, Conservation Techniques and Studies and Diverse Musicological Studies.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Digital and Traditional Archives Management Conservation 4 works
- 2 Latin American history and culture Visual Arts and Performing Arts 2 works
- 3 Conservation Techniques and Studies Conservation 2 works
- 4 Diverse Musicological Studies Music 2 works
- 5 Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis Archeology 2 works
- 6 Scottish History and National Identity History 2 works
- 7 Library Science and Information Systems Information Systems 1 works
- 8 Cinema and Media Studies Economics and Econometrics 1 works
- 9 Musicology and Musical Analysis Music 1 works
- 10 Intelligence, Security, War Strategy Political Science and International Relations 1 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Library of Congress's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 34% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Washington D.C.
- Georgetown University
- George Washington University
- United States Naval Research Laboratory
- Agricultural Research Service
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs
- United States Department of Agriculture
- American University
- Environmental Protection Agency
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.