Science Explorer Interactive view Map
Research facility · Frankfurt am Main · Germany

Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics

In research, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics stands highest in Social Sciences (#9,951 of 16,945 worldwide) and Life Sciences (#8,487 of 14,347 worldwide), over all time. Relative to its size it is most specialised in Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroscience — Cognitive Neuroscience is 44.9× its share of world research.

World rank, 2022–2025
#13,643
of 28,054 · #18,479 all time
Rank in Germany
#527
of 1,178
Research works
382
▲ 74% vs 2013–17
Citations
8.4k
22.1 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
25.0%
record average 16.5%
Open access
62%
world 28%

What is Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #9,951 of 16,945 23.6%200
Life SciencesDomain #8,487 of 14,347 32.2%124

Each strip is that field’s whole ranked pool, with the notch where Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no world mark, because the world rate differs by field (from about 6% to 21% in this record).

What does Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics specialise in?

Where its research is concentrated relative to its size: Cognitive Neuroscience takes 44.9× the share of its output that it takes of world research.

  1. Cognitive NeuroscienceSubfield · 36.8 works45×
  2. NeuroscienceField · 39.3 works21×
← less than its size predictsmore →

Location quotient, a volume reading rather than an impact one. It surfaces small, lopsided specialities.

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.11× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.45× its world share, 3 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Neuroscience: 21.49× its world share, 39 worksNeurosciencePharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics: 0.14× its world share, 0 worksPharmacology, Toxico…Computer Science: 1.71× its world share, 15 worksComputer ScienceEngineering: 0.08× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.34× its world share, 1 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 0.24× its world share, 1 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.17× its world share, 4 worksMedicineNursing: 0.22× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 3.90× its world share, 13 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 0.29× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.80× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 8.09× its world share, 28 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.33× its world share, 5 worksSocial Sciencesworld share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, and 2×. Widest outward: Neuroscience, 21.5×. Every wedge is a field page.

Who are the top researchers at Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics?

Ranked on the composite score, Melanie Wald‐Fuhrmann, Nori Jacoby and Klaus Frieler lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics.

  1. 1 Melanie Wald‐Fuhrmann Germany · #203,399 worldwide 41 citations · 31 works
  2. 2 Nori Jacoby Germany · #1,014,622 worldwide 41 citations · 21 works
  3. 3 Klaus Frieler Germany · #1,285,376 worldwide 28 citations · 15 works
  4. 4 Edward A. Vessel Germany · #1,326,434 worldwide 35 citations · 18 works
All ranked researchers at Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics

Which keywords describe research at Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics?

By fractional works in 2022–2025, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Neural Mechanisms, Emotional Responses, Brain Plasticity, Auditory Cortex, Music Perception, Temporal Processing, Neuronal Oscillations and Working Memory.

▲ more of its work than of the world’s◆ about the world’s share▼ less than the world’s

Size is fractional works in 2022–2025 in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Neural Mechanisms18▲ 171×4 topics
  2. Emotional Responses17▲ 133×4 topics
  3. Brain Plasticity14▲ 318×2 topics
  4. Auditory Cortex13▲ 377×2 topics
  5. Music Perception13▲ 503×1 topic
  6. Temporal Processing13▲ 503×1 topic
  7. Neuronal Oscillations11▲ 133×2 topics
  8. Deep Learning9▲ 2.2×10 topics
  9. Working Memory7▲ 65×3 topics
  10. Cortical Connectivity6▲ 136×2 topics
  11. Neural Correlates6▲ 60×5 topics
  12. Social Cognition6▲ 33×7 topics
  13. Synchronization6▲ 46×2 topics
  14. Cortical Networks6▲ 93×1 topic
  15. Embodiment6▲ 29×4 topics
  16. Feature Extraction6▲ 12×3 topics
  17. Gamma Rhythms6▲ 93×1 topic
  18. Language Development5▲ 40×4 topics
  19. Crossmodal Processing5▲ 263×1 topic
  20. Multisensory Integration5▲ 263×1 topic
  21. Convolutional Neural Networks5▲ 6.3×2 topics
  22. Audio Signal Classification5▲ 103×1 topic
  23. Human-Computer Interaction5▲ 24×5 topics
  24. Music Information Retrieval5▲ 103×1 topic
  25. Speech Perception4▲ 45×3 topics
  26. Neural Basis4▲ 40×3 topics
  27. Neural Circuits4▲ 38×3 topics
  28. Emotion3▲ 14×6 topics
  29. Perceptual Learning3▲ 59×2 topics
  30. Aesthetic Perception3▲ 193×1 topic
  31. Neuroaesthetics3▲ 193×1 topic
  32. Language3▲ 11×3 topics
  33. Ethnomusicology3▲ 66×2 topics
  34. Social Interaction3▲ 6.5×4 topics
  35. Philosophy3▲ 5.7×5 topics
  36. Action Observation3▲ 125×1 topic
  37. Mirror Neuron System3▲ 125×1 topic
  38. Neuroscience3▲ 8.2×8 topics
  39. Cognition2▲ 16×4 topics
  40. Functional Connectivity2▲ 17×3 topics

Which research topics does Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics publish most on?

By volume in 2022–2025: Neuroscience and Music Perception, Neural dynamics and brain function, Multisensory perception and integration and Music and Audio Processing.

  1. 1 Neuroscience and Music Perception Cognitive Neuroscience 13 works
  2. 2 Neural dynamics and brain function Cognitive Neuroscience 6 works
  3. 3 Multisensory perception and integration Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5 works
  4. 4 Music and Audio Processing Signal Processing 5 works
  5. 5 Aesthetic Perception and Analysis Cognitive Neuroscience 3 works
  6. 6 Action Observation and Synchronization Social Psychology 3 works
  7. 7 Music Technology and Sound Studies Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2 works
  8. 8 Diverse Music Education Insights Music 2 works
  9. 9 Language, Metaphor, and Cognition Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2 works
  10. 10 Phonetics and Phonology Research Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available62.4%not open37.6%

World: 28% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors44.0%domestic only56.0%

World: 19% is written across borders.

How has Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics's research output changed?

Output in 2018–2022 was 74% higher than in 2013–2017.

2005201020152020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Other research institutions in Frankfurt am Main

All research institutions in Frankfurt am Main

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.