Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium
- Research works
- 21 fractional, all time
- Citations
- 99 4.8 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 13.7% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 5% world 28%
Not ranked overall: Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Which keywords describe research at Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: STEM Education, Online Learning, Learning Analytics, Blended Learning, Distance Education, Education, Computational Thinking and Programming Education.
- Innovation
- Child Development
- Analytics
- Sustainability
- Gender
- Technology Integration
- Remote Laboratories
- Student Engagement
- Internet Use
- Social TV
- Programming Education
- Computational Thinking
- Distance Education
- Online Learning
- STEM Education
- Blended Learning
- Learning Analytics
- Education
- Interactive Television
- Supply Chain Management
- Digital Divide
- Engineering Education
- Student Achievement
- Cultural Diversity
- ICT
- Technology
- Big Data
- Garment Industry
- Labor Conditions
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 29 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 29 words, with their numbers
- STEM Education4▲ 70×2 topics
- Online Learning3▲ 36×2 topics
- Blended Learning3▲ 155×1 topic
- Distance Education3▲ 104×1 topic
- Learning Analytics3▲ 219×2 topics
- Computational Thinking3▲ 509×1 topic
- Education3▲ 10×6 topics
- Programming Education3▲ 509×1 topic
- Interactive Television2▲ 357×1 topic
- Social TV2▲ 357×1 topic
- Supply Chain Management2▲ 19×2 topics
- Internet Use2▲ 165×2 topics
- Digital Divide2▲ 39×2 topics
- Student Engagement1▲ 26×3 topics
- Engineering Education1▲ 65×1 topic
- Remote Laboratories1▲ 158×1 topic
- Student Achievement1▲ 72×3 topics
- Technology Integration1▲ 31×3 topics
- Cultural Diversity1▲ 30×3 topics
- Gender1▲ 10×1 topic
- ICT1▲ 64×1 topic
- Sustainability1▲ 3.2×2 topics
- Technology1▲ 13×4 topics
- Analytics1▲ 90×1 topic
- Big Data1▲ 8.9×1 topic
- Child Development1▲ 17×2 topics
- Garment Industry1▲ 1076×1 topic
- Innovation1▲ 5.3×3 topics
- Labor Conditions1▲ 138×1 topic
Which research topics does Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium publish most on?
By volume: Online and Blended Learning, Teaching and Learning Programming, Multimedia Communication and Technology and Experimental Learning in Engineering.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 Online and Blended Learning Education 3 works
- 2 Teaching and Learning Programming Computer Science Applications 3 works
- 3 Multimedia Communication and Technology Sociology and Political Science 2 works
- 4 Experimental Learning in Engineering Media Technology 1 works
- 5 Gender and Technology in Education Gender Studies 1 works
- 6 Big Data and Business Intelligence Management Information Systems 1 works
- 7 Software Engineering and Design Patterns Development 1 works
- 8 Education and Technology Integration Education 1 works
- 9 ICT in Developing Communities Information Systems 1 works
- 10 Child Development and Digital Technology Education 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium's research output changed?
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.