- World rank, all time
- #33,257 of 34,923
- Rank in United States
- #6,975 of 7,310
- Research works
- 135 ▲ 13% vs 2018-21
- Citations
- 1.8k 13.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 12.1% all institutions 10.0%
- vs its own fields
- 1.07× 1.00× is exactly expected
- Open access
- 24% world 40%
- International
- 7% world 18%
Which fields of science does National Center for State Courts work in?
In all years, 83% of research at National Center for State Courts is in Social Sciences, 11% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (57%), Economics, Econometrics and Finance (12%), Psychology (10%). It does 3.7× the world's share of Social Sciences.
Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.
Its 4 domains and 17 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences11383.3%
- Social Sciences7756.8%
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1712.3%
- Psychology1410.3%
- Business, Management and Accounting42.6%
- Decision Sciences10.8%
- Arts and Humanities10.5%
- Health Sciences1410.6%
- Health Professions107.4%
- Medicine43.3%
- Physical Sciences64.2%
- Mathematics21.1%
- Environmental Science10.9%
- Engineering10.9%
- Computer Science10.8%
- Earth and Planetary Sciences10.4%
- Life Sciences31.9%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Social Sciences, 5.8×. Every wedge is a field page.
All 7 fields, with their numbers
- Social Sciences5.76×7 works
- Psychology2.73×1 works
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.60×0 works
- Health Professions1.19×0 works
- Business, Management and Accounting0.53×0 works
- Computer Science0.51×0 works
- Medicine0.34×1 works
Who are the top researchers at National Center for State Courts?
Ranked on the quality score, David B. Rottman, Richard Y. Schauffler and Pamela Casey lead among researchers whose main affiliation is National Center for State Courts.
- 1
David B. Rottman
United States · #921,708 worldwide 1.3k citations · 90 works
- 2
Richard Y. Schauffler
United States · #1,330,130 worldwide 1k citations · 15 works
- 3
Pamela Casey
United States · #1,411,079 worldwide 561 citations · 33 works
- 4
Nicole L. Waters
United States · #1,703,097 worldwide 261 citations · 24 works
- 5
G. Thomas Munsterman
United States · #1,794,922 worldwide 408 citations · 28 works
- 6
Paula L. Hannaford‐Agor
United States · #1,868,508 worldwide 355 citations · 43 works
- 7
Brian Ostrom
United States · #1,954,110 worldwide 374 citations · 24 works
- 8
Brian J. Ostrom
United States · #2,573,514 worldwide 277 citations · 35 works
- 9
VICTOR EUGENE FLANGO
United States · #2,734,148 worldwide 386 citations · 47 works
- 10
Ingo Keilitz
United States · #3,062,960 worldwide 623 citations · 48 works
Which keywords describe research at National Center for State Courts?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Regulation, Property Rights, Enforcement, Criminal Justice, Contracts, Litigation, Human Rights and Legal Education.
- Ethnicity
- Law and Economics
- Intervention
- Democracy
- Mental Disorders
- Legal Consciousness
- Transnational Law
- Environmental Law
- Criminal Behavior
- Public Opinion
- Mass Incarceration
- Jury
- Racial Disparities
- Criminal Trials
- Constitutional Law
- Welfare Rights Advice
- Legal Education
- Litigation
- Criminal Justice
- Property Rights
- Regulation
- Enforcement
- Contracts
- Human Rights
- Health Impacts
- Intellectual Property
- Mental Health
- Supreme Court
- Decision Making
- Legal Proceedings
- Prison System
- Developmental Trajectories
- Corporate Governance
- Policy Dimensions
- Judicial Politics
- Risk Factors
- Prevalence
- Youth Violence
- Psychopathy
- Cultural Competence
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Regulation16▲ 20×9 topics
- Property Rights15▲ 98×4 topics
- Enforcement12▲ 240×2 topics
- Criminal Justice12▲ 58×2 topics
- Contracts12▲ 316×1 topic
- Litigation12▲ 316×1 topic
- Human Rights11▲ 9.7×14 topics
- Legal Education11▲ 125×2 topics
- Health Impacts11▲ 120×1 topic
- Welfare Rights Advice11▲ 304×1 topic
- Intellectual Property9▲ 67×3 topics
- Constitutional Law9▲ 51×3 topics
- Mental Health9▲ 5.9×14 topics
- Criminal Trials8▲ 270×2 topics
- Supreme Court8▲ 190×2 topics
- Racial Disparities8▲ 117×2 topics
- Decision Making7▲ 24×2 topics
- Jury7▲ 921×1 topic
- Legal Proceedings7▲ 921×1 topic
- Mass Incarceration7▲ 161×1 topic
- Prison System7▲ 89×1 topic
- Public Opinion6▲ 26×4 topics
- Developmental Trajectories6▲ 35×3 topics
- Criminal Behavior6▲ 98×2 topics
- Corporate Governance6▲ 8.3×3 topics
- Environmental Law6▲ 31×2 topics
- Policy Dimensions6▲ 186×1 topic
- Transnational Law6▲ 170×1 topic
- Judicial Politics5▲ 184×1 topic
- Legal Consciousness5▲ 184×1 topic
- Risk Factors5▲ 3.6×7 topics
- Mental Disorders4▲ 34×2 topics
- Prevalence4▲ 7.8×4 topics
- Democracy4▲ 7.7×6 topics
- Youth Violence4▲ 61×3 topics
- Intervention3▲ 58×2 topics
- Psychopathy3▲ 72×1 topic
- Law and Economics3▲ 183×1 topic
- Cultural Competence3▲ 19×4 topics
- Ethnicity3▲ 7.9×2 topics
Which research topics does National Center for State Courts publish most on?
By volume in 2022-now: European and International Law Studies, Legal Education and Practice Innovations, Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment and Jury Decision Making Processes.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 European and International Law Studies Political Science and International Relations 1 works
- 2 Legal Education and Practice Innovations Law 1 works
- 3 Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment Sociology and Political Science 0 works
- 4 Jury Decision Making Processes Law 0 works
- 5 Judicial and Constitutional Studies Law 0 works
- 6 Law in Society and Culture Law 0 works
- 7 Reproductive Health and Technologies Reproductive Medicine 0 works
- 8 Global Peace and Security Dynamics Political Science and International Relations 0 works
- 9 Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems Economics and Econometrics 0 works
- 10 International Law and Human Rights Political Science and International Relations 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 40% of research is openly available.
World: 18% is written across borders.
How has National Center for State Courts's research output changed?
Output in 2022-2025 was 13% higher than in 2018-2021.
The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Its share of all research
Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is National Center for State Courts as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000031% in 2024.
Fractional works of National Center for State Courts over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.
Other research institutions in Williamsburg
- William & Mary
- Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
- Virginia Oncology Associates
- Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture
- Williamsburg Regional Library
- Strategic Analysis Enterprises (United States)
- Advanced Vision Institute
- GuideStar
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about National Center for State Courts. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.
