Jury Decision Making Processes
Jury Decision Making Processes is a research topic within Law. Science Explorer counts 6.1k research works in it since 1950. 20.7% of them reached the world's top 10% most cited for their field and year.
This cluster of papers explores various aspects of jury decision making in legal proceedings, including the impact of evidence law, reasonable doubt, juror comprehension, and judicial instructions on both criminal trials and civil litigation. It also delves into the role of lay participation in the legal process.
- Jury
- Decision Making
- Legal Proceedings
- Evidence Law
- Reasonable Doubt
- Juror Comprehension
- Judicial Instructions
- Criminal Trials
- Civil Litigation
- Lay Participation
- Research works
- 6.1k fractional, since 1950
- In the world top 10%
- 1.3k per year above
- Top-10% rate
- 20.7% share of its works in the world top 10%
- Growth, 2013–17 → 2018–22
- -6% the tick is no change
Which countries lead Jury Decision Making Processes research?
By volume, the United States and Russia publish the most (187 and 60 works in 2022–2025).
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 United States 187 works
- 2 Russia 60 works
- 3 United Kingdom 54 works
- 4 Australia 41 works
- 5 China 36 works
- 6 Poland 24 works
- 7 Canada 21 works
- 8 France 20 works
- 9 Italy 20 works
- 10 Indonesia 20 works
How concentrated that is
The same countries as shares of everything the list above accounts for. A node where two countries do two thirds of the work and one spread evenly across twelve read alike as a ranking and not at all alike here.
Shares of the rows listed above, not of the whole node.
Which institutions lead Jury Decision Making Processes research?
By volume in 2022–2025, Monash University publishes the most Jury Decision Making Processes research, followed by University of New England and Jagiellonian University.
By volume, 2022–2025
- 1 Monash UniversityAustralia 9 works
- 2 University of New EnglandAustralia 7 works
- 3 Jagiellonian UniversityPoland 5 works
- 4 University of MichiganUnited States 5 works
- 5 Kutafin Moscow State Law UniversityRussia 5 works
- 6 Université Paris 8France 5 works
- 7 London School of Economics and Political ScienceUnited Kingdom 5 works
- 8 Cornell UniversityUnited States 5 works
- 9 Chicago Kent College of LawUnited States 5 works
- 10 Weatherford CollegeUnited States 5 works
Who are the leading researchers in Jury Decision Making Processes?
The most-cited researchers publishing on Jury Decision Making Processes include Tom R. Tyler.
- 1 Tom R. Tyler United States 1.8k citations
Ranked by citations received across their whole record, among researchers with at least three works on this topic.
Where is Jury Decision Making Processes research done?
The largest centres of Jury Decision Making Processes research in 2022–2025 are Moscow (Russia), London (United Kingdom), New York (United States) and Melbourne (Australia). Among places with at least 20 works in it, it is an unusually large share of all research in Moscow.
Largest cities, 2022–2025
Where it is the local speciality
- MoscowRU · 24.4 works3.3×
Location quotient: how much more of its research is in Jury Decision Making Processes than the world average.
Where is the best place to study Jury Decision Making Processes?
Among universities, judged by research, Monash University score highest, combining excellence, specialisation, size, growth and international reach. Research strength is one signal when choosing where to study; it does not measure teaching.
| # | University | Score | Top 10% | Specialisation | Works | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monash UniversityAustralia | 0.0 | 1.9% | 14.8× | 9 | +35.5% |
Universities only. Score blends excellence (30%), specialisation (25%), size (20%), growth (15%) and international reach (10%), 2015–2022; growth compares 2010–14 with 2015–19.
Is Jury Decision Making Processes research growing?
Output in 2018–2022 was 6% lower than in 2013–2017, peaking in 2025.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Which topics inside it are moving
Growth and decline on one axis around a shared zero. Two lists side by side hide the thing that matters: whether the growth dwarfs the decline, or the other way round.