Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques
- World rank, all time
- #39,138 of 42,892
- Rank in France
- #2,102 of 2,321
- Research works
- 135 ▼ 11% vs 2013–17
- Citations
- 3.1k 23.0 per fractional work
- Top-10% rate
- 29.8% record average 16.5%
- Open access
- 36% world 28%
Field profile
Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.
Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Decision Sciences, 21.1×. Every wedge is a field page.
- Decision Sciences 21.1×
- Health Professions 3.6×
- Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics 3.5×
- Veterinary 3.2×
- Business, Management and Accounting 3.1×
- Arts and Humanities 3.0×
- Nursing 2.6×
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1.9×
- Medicine 1.3×
- Computer Science 1.0×
- Immunology and Microbiology 0.6×
- Neuroscience 0.5×
- Psychology 0.5×
- Social Sciences 0.4×
- Engineering 0.3×
- Environmental Science 0.1×
- Agricultural and Biological Sciences 0.1×
Who are the top researchers at Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques?
Ranked on the composite score, Michel Zitt and Elise Bassecoulard lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques.
- 1 Michel Zitt France · #188,671 worldwide 69 citations · 36 works
- 2 Elise Bassecoulard France · #373,088 worldwide 62 citations · 20 works
Which keywords describe research at Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques?
By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Interdisciplinary Research, Bibliometric Analysis, Research Evaluation, Innovation Policy, Innovation, Smart Specialization, Public Health and Institutional Quality.
- Science Communication
- Institutions
- Open Access
- Peer Review
- drug use
- Patient Rights
- Healthcare Policy
- Substance Abuse
- Medical Ethics
- Fiscal Policy
- R&D Subsidies
- Social Determinants of Health
- Territorial Governance
- Community Engagement
- Regional Growth
- Knowledge Economy
- Smart Specialization
- Public Health
- Innovation Policy
- Bibliometric Analysis
- Interdisciplinary Research
- Research Evaluation
- Innovation
- Economic Development
- Institutional Quality
- European Union Cohesion Policy
- Economic Growth
- Local Development
- Public Policy
- Private R&D
- Ecology
- Healthcare Quality Indicators
- HIV
- Healthcare Legislation
- Inequalities
- Social Innovation
- harm reduction
- Scholarly Communication
- Data Sharing
- Preprints
Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.
All 40 words, with their numbers
- Interdisciplinary Research19▲ 175×4 topics
- Bibliometric Analysis18▲ 292×1 topic
- Research Evaluation18▲ 626×1 topic
- Innovation Policy8▲ 75×4 topics
- Innovation7▲ 6.0×8 topics
- Public Health7▲ 3.6×10 topics
- Economic Development5▲ 5.5×7 topics
- Smart Specialization5▲ 92×2 topics
- Institutional Quality4▲ 43×2 topics
- Knowledge Economy4▲ 35×2 topics
- European Union Cohesion Policy4▲ 118×1 topic
- Regional Growth4▲ 31×1 topic
- Economic Growth4▲ 3.8×7 topics
- Community Engagement4▲ 8.6×3 topics
- Local Development3▲ 19×2 topics
- Territorial Governance3▲ 17×2 topics
- Public Policy3▲ 5.4×5 topics
- Social Determinants of Health3▲ 11×3 topics
- Private R&D3▲ 137×1 topic
- R&D Subsidies3▲ 137×1 topic
- Ecology3▲ 10×3 topics
- Fiscal Policy3▲ 9.6×4 topics
- Healthcare Quality Indicators3▲ 36×2 topics
- Medical Ethics3▲ 12×2 topics
- HIV3▲ 17×2 topics
- Substance Abuse3▲ 29×2 topics
- Healthcare Legislation3▲ 27×1 topic
- Healthcare Policy3▲ 26×1 topic
- Inequalities3▲ 53×1 topic
- Patient Rights3▲ 20×1 topic
- Social Innovation3▲ 15×4 topics
- drug use3▲ 69×1 topic
- harm reduction3▲ 69×1 topic
- Peer Review2▲ 59×2 topics
- Scholarly Communication2▲ 73×2 topics
- Open Access2▲ 21×2 topics
- Data Sharing2▲ 86×1 topic
- Institutions2▲ 20×2 topics
- Preprints2▲ 147×1 topic
- Science Communication2▲ 28×1 topic
Which research topics does Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques publish most on?
By volume in 2022–2025: scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Healthcare Systems and Practices, Data-Driven Disease Surveillance and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis.
Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.
- 1 scientometrics and bibliometrics research Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2 works
- 2 Healthcare Systems and Practices General Health Professions 1 works
- 3 Data-Driven Disease Surveillance Epidemiology 1 works
- 4 Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis History and Philosophy of Science 1 works
- 5 Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes Epidemiology 0 works
- 6 Big Data and Business Intelligence Management Information Systems 0 works
- 7 Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects Pathology and Forensic Medicine 0 works
- 8 Research Data Management Practices Information Systems 0 works
- 9 Data Quality and Management Management Science and Operations Research 0 works
- 10 Wine Industry and Tourism Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 0 works
How open and international is its research?
Against the world’s own shares — the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.
World: 28% of research is openly available.
World: 19% is written across borders.
How has Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques's research output changed?
Output in 2018–2022 was 11% lower than in 2013–2017.
The same series as a ribbon — one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.
Other research institutions in Paris
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Inserm
- Sorbonne Université
- Université Paris Cité
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
- Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
- Institut Pasteur
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris
Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners are in the interactive view on the map.