Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Mountain View · United States

PocketLab (United States)

thepocketlab.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
24
▲ 410% vs 2018-21
Citations
421
17.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
8.2%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
40%
world 40%
International
60%
world 18%
PocketLab (United States)

Not ranked overall: PocketLab (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does PocketLab (United States) work in?

In all years, 38% of research at PocketLab (United States) is in Life Sciences, 30% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Agricultural and Biological Sciences (24%), Medicine (20%), Health Professions (7%). It does 1.8× the world's share of Life Sciences.

Life Sciences: 9 fractional works · 38.4% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 6 fractional works · 24.3% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 2 fractional works · 8.3% of its workInsect Science: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workPlant Science: 1 fractional works · 4.9% of its workAnimal Science and Zoology: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 2 fractional works · 7.1% of its workParasitology: 1 fractional works · 4.8% of its workMicrobiology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 2 fractional works · 6.9% of its workGenetics: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workMolecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 2.2% of its workCell Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workClinical Biochemistry: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 7 fractional works · 30.0% of its workMedicine: 5 fractional works · 19.7% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workRehabilitation: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workCritical Care and Intensive Care Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workGenetics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workHematology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Allergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHepatology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Professions: 2 fractional works · 7.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 1 fractional works · 4.9% of its workEmergency Medical Services: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workVeterinary: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workSmall Animals: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workPhysical Sciences: 4 fractional works · 16.3% of its workEnvironmental Science: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 4.8% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workComputer Science Applications: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHardware and Architecture: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEngineering: 1 fractional works · 3.1% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workSurfaces, Coatings and Films: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workApplied Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workChemical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 4 fractional works · 15.4% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 6.6% of its workAnthropology: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workCultural Studies: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workUrban Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workArts and Humanities: 1 fractional works · 5.5% of its workMuseology: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workPhilosophy: 0 fractional works · 1.4% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workArcheology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 3.3% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workClinical Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKPocketLab (UnitedStates)24fractional works, all years
Life Sciences38%Physical Sciences16%Health Sciences30%Social Sciences15%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences624.3%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology27.1%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology26.9%
    1. Medicine519.7%
    2. Health Professions27.4%
    3. Veterinary13.0%
    1. Environmental Science15.5%
    2. Computer Science13.3%
    3. Engineering13.1%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences01.4%
    5. Materials Science01.4%
    6. Mathematics00.7%
    7. Physics and Astronomy00.5%
    8. Chemical Engineering00.2%
    9. Energy00.1%
    1. Social Sciences26.6%
    2. Arts and Humanities15.5%
    3. Psychology13.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.27× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.56× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Chemical Engineering: 3.20× its world share, 0 worksChemical EngineeringComputer Science: 1.68× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 0.77× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.17× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.45× its world share, 0 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 2.24× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceHealth Professions: 1.98× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 1.67× its world share, 1 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 4.07× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesSocial Sciences: 1.61× its world share, 1 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Arts and Humanities, 4.1×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 12 fields, with their numbers
  1. Arts and Humanities4.07×0 works
  2. Chemical Engineering3.20×0 works
  3. Materials Science2.24×0 works
  4. Health Professions1.98×0 works
  5. Computer Science1.68×1 works
  6. Medicine1.67×1 works
  7. Social Sciences1.61×1 works
  8. Immunology and Microbiology1.56×0 works
  9. Energy0.77×0 works
  10. Environmental Science0.45×0 works
  11. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.27×0 works
  12. Engineering0.17×0 works

Who are the top researchers at PocketLab (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Emmanuel Hecht lead among researchers whose main affiliation is PocketLab (United States).

  1. 1 Emmanuel Hecht United States · #2,810,732 worldwide 1 citations · 23 works
All ranked researchers at PocketLab (United States)

What are the most cited papers from PocketLab (United States)?

The most cited paper from PocketLab (United States) is "Molecular ecology and diversity in gut microbial ecosystems." (Roderick Ian Mackie, Rustam I. Aminov, Bryan A. White et al., 2000), with 59 citations. Next come "Boophilus microplus: rejection of larvae from British breed cattle" (59) and "On the mechanism of pairing of single- and double-stranded DNA molecules by the recA and single-stranded DNA-binding proteins of Escherichia coli." (54).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Molecular ecology and diversity in gut microbial ecosystems. Roderick Ian Mackie, Rustam I. Aminov, Bryan A. White et al. · CABI Publishing eBooks Book chapter 2000 59
2 Boophilus microplus: rejection of larvae from British breed cattle D. Koudstaal, David H. KEMP, J.D. Kerr · Parasitology Jun 1978 59
3 On the mechanism of pairing of single- and double-stranded DNA molecules by the recA and single-stranded DNA-binding proteins of Escherichia coli. Douglas A. Julin, Peter W. Riddles, I Lehman · Journal of Biological Chemistry Open access 1986 54
4 BREEDING FOR RESISTANCE TO BOOPHILUS MICROPLUS IN AUSTRALIAN ILLAWARRA SHORTHORN AND BRAHMAN X AUSTRALIAN ILLAWARRA SHORTHORN CATTLE K. B. W. Utech, R. H. Wharton · Australian Veterinary Journal Feb 1982 52
5 THE TRANSMISSION OFBABESIA BOVISIN HERDS OF EUROPEAN AND ZEBU X EUROPEAN CATTLE INFESTED WITH THE TICK, BOOPHILUS MICROPLUS Diane Feeney Mahoney, I.G. Wright, B. V. Goodger et al. · Australian Veterinary Journal Oct 1981 45
All 42 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at PocketLab (United States)?

By fractional works in all years, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Public Health, Genetic Characterization, Bluetongue Virus, Culicoides Biting Midges, Host-Pathogen Interactions and Invasive Species.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in all years in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 13 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 13 words, with their numbers
  1. Epidemiology4▲ 4.3×13 topics
  2. Pathogenesis2▲ 15×3 topics
  3. Public Health2▲ 6.1×6 topics
  4. Climate Change2▲ 2.9×5 topics
  5. Genetic Characterization2▲ 126×2 topics
  6. Bluetongue Virus2▲ 242×1 topic
  7. Culicoides Biting Midges2▲ 242×1 topic
  8. Host-Pathogen Interactions1▲ 57×3 topics
  9. Biodiversity1▲ 6.7×2 topics
  10. Invasive Species1▲ 8.7×2 topics
  11. Beaver Dams1▲ 375×1 topic
  12. Ecosystem Engineering1▲ 113×1 topic
  13. Mental Health1▲ 3.8×2 topics

Which research topics does PocketLab (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Posthumanist Ethics and Activism, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Wound Healing and Treatments and Crafts, Textile, and Design.

Posthumanist Ethics and …0Posthumanist Ethics and Activism: 0 fractional worksInnovative Human-Technol…0Innovative Human-Technology Interaction: 0 fractional worksWound Healing and Treatm…0Wound Healing and Treatments: 0 fractional worksCrafts, Textile, and Des…0Crafts, Textile, and Design: 0 fractional worksSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity: 0 fractional worksPlasma Applications and Diagnostics: 0 fractional worksCentral European Literar…0Central European Literary Studies: 0 fractional worksHistorical and Cultural Studies of Poland: 0 fractional worksUrban Development and Cultural Heritage: 0 fractional worksMobile Health and mHealth Applications: 0 fractional works
Cultural StudiesHuman-Computer InteractionRehabilitationMuseology6 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Posthumanist Ethics and Activism Cultural Studies 0 works
  2. 2 Innovative Human-Technology Interaction Human-Computer Interaction 0 works
  3. 3 Wound Healing and Treatments Rehabilitation 0 works
  4. 4 Crafts, Textile, and Design Museology 0 works
  5. 5 Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity Surfaces, Coatings and Films 0 works
  6. 6 Plasma Applications and Diagnostics Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 0 works
  7. 7 Central European Literary Studies Anthropology 0 works
  8. 8 Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland History 0 works
  9. 9 Urban Development and Cultural Heritage Urban Studies 0 works
  10. 10 Mobile Health and mHealth Applications General Health Professions 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available40.4%not open59.6%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors60.5%domestic only39.5%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has PocketLab (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 410% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is PocketLab (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000015% in 2023.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%PocketLab (United States)0.000045% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of PocketLab (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Mountain View

All research institutions in Mountain View

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about PocketLab (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.