Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Brussels · Belgium

Pour la Solidarité

In research, Pour la Solidarité stands highest in Social Sciences (#6,028 of 14,833 worldwide) and Social Sciences (#4,314 of 9,330 worldwide), over all time.

pourlasolidarite.eu/enROR OpenAlex
World rank, 2022-now
#18,012
of 22,385 · #9,941 all time
Rank in Belgium
#83
of 105
Research works
468
▼ 44% vs 2018-21
Citations
2.5k
5.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
9.4%
all institutions 10.0%
vs its own fields
1.06×
1.00× is exactly expected
Open access
51%
world 40%
International
26%
world 18%
Pour la Solidarité

What is Pour la Solidarité known for in research?

The fields where it stands highest, over all time, ranked among every institution above the floor in each field.

FieldWorld rankWhere that sitsTop-10% rateWorks
Social SciencesDomain #6,028 of 14,833 6.0%317
Social SciencesField #4,314 of 9,330 6.0%235

Each strip is that field's whole ranked pool, with the notch where Pour la Solidarité sits in it, in the colour of the band that rank falls in. The track under the rate is the rate itself: it carries no average mark, because the average differs by field (from about 6% in Dentistry to 21% in Economics).

Which fields of science does Pour la Solidarité work in?

In 2022-now, 66% of research at Pour la Solidarité is in Social Sciences, 23% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (46%), Medicine (12%), Health Professions (10%). It does 2.4× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 49 fractional works · 65.9% of its workSocial Sciences: 35 fractional works · 46.0% of its workSociology and Political Science: 14 fractional works · 19.2% of its workUrban Studies: 7 fractional works · 9.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 5 fractional works · 6.5% of its workLaw: 3 fractional works · 3.4% of its workEducation: 3 fractional works · 3.4% of its workCultural Studies: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workDemography: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workGender Studies: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workArts and Humanities: 6 fractional works · 8.6% of its workPhilosophy: 2 fractional works · 2.8% of its workLiterature and Literary Theory: 2 fractional works · 2.3% of its workLanguage and Linguistics: 1 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHistory: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workPsychology: 3 fractional works · 4.5% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 2.2% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workExperimental and Cognitive Psychology: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 3 fractional works · 3.7% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 1 fractional works · 1.7% of its workStrategy and Management: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workMarketing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 2 fractional works · 3.1% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 2 fractional works · 2.1% of its workGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workHealth Sciences: 17 fractional works · 22.6% of its workMedicine: 9 fractional works · 12.2% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 3 fractional works · 3.6% of its workReproductive Medicine: 1 fractional works · 1.8% of its workObstetrics and Gynecology: 1 fractional works · 1.6% of its workInfectious Diseases: 1 fractional works · 1.1% of its workEndocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEpidemiology: 1 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPulmonary and Respiratory Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSurgery: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEmergency Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 7 fractional works · 9.8% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 7 fractional works · 8.9% of its workHealth Information Management: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workOccupational Therapy: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNutrition and Dietetics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workDentistry: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPeriodontics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 5 fractional works · 6.9% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 3 fractional works · 4.6% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.0% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 1 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workAgronomy and Crop Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHorticulture: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 1 fractional works · 1.4% of its workImmunology: 1 fractional works · 0.9% of its workVirology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 1 fractional works · 0.8% of its workEndocrinology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workPhysical Sciences: 3 fractional works · 4.6% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 2.5% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 1.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComputer Networks and Communications: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workALL ITS WORKPour laSolidarité75fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences7%Physical Sciences5%Health Sciences23%Social Sciences66%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 18 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences3546.0%
    2. Arts and Humanities68.6%
    3. Psychology34.5%
    4. Business, Management and Accounting33.7%
    5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance23.1%
    1. Medicine912.2%
    2. Health Professions79.8%
    3. Nursing00.3%
    4. Dentistry00.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences34.6%
    2. Immunology and Microbiology11.4%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology10.8%
    4. Neuroscience00.2%
    1. Environmental Science22.5%
    2. Computer Science11.3%
    3. Engineering00.7%
    4. Mathematics00.1%
    5. Energy00.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.96× its world share, 3 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.16× its world share, 1 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 1.35× its world share, 1 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.12× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 0.16× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEnergy: 0.07× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.04× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 0.50× its world share, 2 worksEnvironmental ScienceMathematics: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsDentistry: 0.46× its world share, 0 worksDentistryHealth Professions: 3.73× its world share, 7 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.64× its world share, 9 worksMedicineNursing: 0.71× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 2.99× its world share, 6 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 1.14× its world share, 3 worksBusiness, Management…Economics, Econometrics and Finance: 1.46× its world share, 2 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 1.47× its world share, 3 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 3.63× its world share, 34 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Health Professions, 3.7×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 18 fields, with their numbers
  1. Health Professions3.73×7 works
  2. Social Sciences3.63×34 works
  3. Arts and Humanities2.99×6 works
  4. Psychology1.47×3 works
  5. Economics, Econometrics and Finance1.46×2 works
  6. Immunology and Microbiology1.35×1 works
  7. Business, Management and Accounting1.14×3 works
  8. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.96×3 works
  9. Nursing0.71×0 works
  10. Medicine0.64×9 works
  11. Environmental Science0.50×2 works
  12. Dentistry0.46×0 works
  13. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.16×1 works
  14. Computer Science0.16×1 works
  15. Mathematics0.13×0 works
  16. Neuroscience0.12×0 works
  17. Energy0.07×0 works
  18. Engineering0.04×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Pour la Solidarité?

Ranked on the quality score, Franck Lamontagne, Helga Milz and Christelle Chauzal-Larguier lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Pour la Solidarité.

  1. 1 Franck Lamontagne Belgium · #2,061,403 worldwide 225 citations · 22 works
  2. 2 Helga Milz Belgium · #2,834,502 worldwide 16 citations · 18 works
  3. 3 Christelle Chauzal-Larguier Belgium · #3,624,743 worldwide 6 citations · 27 works
  4. 4 Jean-Jacques Thibon Belgium · #3,717,529 worldwide 18 citations · 23 works
  5. 5 Jean-Baptiste de Foucauld Belgium · #3,826,867 worldwide 46 citations · 36 works
  6. 6 Michael Charleston B. Chua Belgium · #3,828,897 worldwide 3 citations · 19 works
  7. 7 Khaled Zouari Belgium · #3,957,287 worldwide 20 citations · 18 works
  8. 8 Agnès Bernard Belgium · #7,087,380 worldwide 172 citations · 109 works
All ranked researchers at Pour la Solidarité

What are the most cited papers from Pour la Solidarité?

The most cited paper from Pour la Solidarité is "Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future" (Jacques Donnez, Marie‐Madeleine Dolmans, 2016), with 777 citations. Next come "Restoration of ovarian activity and pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a review of 60 cases of reimplantation" (554) and "Risk of transferring malignant cells with transplanted frozen-thawed ovarian tissue" (344).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Uterine fibroid management: from the present to the future Jacques Donnez, Marie‐Madeleine Dolmans · Human Reproduction Update Open access 27 Jul 2016 777
2 Restoration of ovarian activity and pregnancy after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: a review of 60 cases of reimplantation Jacques Donnez, Marie‐Madeleine Dolmans, António Pellicer et al. · Fertility and Sterility Open access 28 Apr 2013 554
3 Risk of transferring malignant cells with transplanted frozen-thawed ovarian tissue Marie‐Madeleine Dolmans, Valérie A. Luyckx, Jacques Donnez et al. · Fertility and Sterility Open access 28 Mar 2013 344
4 Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? Javier García-Solares, Jacques Donnez, Olivier Donnez et al. · Fertility and Sterility Open access Mar 2018 343
5 Ovarian cortex transplantation: 60 reported live births brings the success and worldwide expansion of the technique towards routine clinical practice Jacques Donnez, Marie‐Madeleine Dolmans · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Open access 25 Jul 2015 335
All 60 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Pour la Solidarité?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Community Engagement, Local Development, Territorial Governance, Cooperatives, Solidarity Economy, Public Policy, Social Innovation and Economic Development.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 40 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 40 words, with their numbers
  1. Community Engagement12▲ 48×6 topics
  2. Local Development10▲ 134×2 topics
  3. Territorial Governance10▲ 120×2 topics
  4. Cooperatives9▲ 164×3 topics
  5. Solidarity Economy9▲ 202×2 topics
  6. Public Policy8▲ 21×5 topics
  7. Social Innovation7▲ 64×3 topics
  8. Economic Development7▲ 12×3 topics
  9. Citizenship7▲ 78×2 topics
  10. Institutionalization7▲ 100×1 topic
  11. Participative Evaluation7▲ 285×1 topic
  12. Social Justice6▲ 14×10 topics
  13. Social Determinants of Health5▲ 32×4 topics
  14. Human Rights5▲ 6.2×16 topics
  15. Mental Health5▲ 4.5×7 topics
  16. Community Development4▲ 33×3 topics
  17. Sustainable Development4▲ 3.4×5 topics
  18. Globalization4▲ 2.6×16 topics
  19. Quality of Life4▲ 3.5×13 topics
  20. Citizen Participation4▲ 40×1 topic
  21. Environmental Participation4▲ 65×1 topic
  22. Gender Equality3▲ 16×5 topics
  23. Public Health3▲ 3.0×11 topics
  24. Medical Ethics3▲ 31×2 topics
  25. Patient Rights3▲ 57×2 topics
  26. Healthcare Access3▲ 13×3 topics
  27. Gender Studies3▲ 23×4 topics
  28. Family Support Policies2▲ 222×1 topic
  29. Inequality2▲ 15×2 topics
  30. Smallholder Farmers2▲ 16×3 topics
  31. Social Support2▲ 6.2×6 topics
  32. Urban Segregation2▲ 222×1 topic
  33. Primary Care2▲ 8.5×6 topics
  34. Rural Development2▲ 9.5×7 topics
  35. Sociolinguistics2▲ 17×3 topics
  36. Healthcare Policy2▲ 32×2 topics
  37. Healthcare Quality Indicators2▲ 51×2 topics
  38. Digital Health2▲ 25×2 topics
  39. Inequalities2▲ 86×1 topic
  40. Universal Health Coverage2▲ 86×1 topic

Which research topics does Pour la Solidarité publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Social Sciences and Governance, French Urban and Social Studies, Social Policies and Family and Healthcare Systems and Practices.

Social Sciences and Gove…7Social Sciences and Governance: 7 fractional worksFrench Urban and Social …4French Urban and Social Studies: 4 fractional worksSocial Policies and Family2Social Policies and Family: 2 fractional worksHealthcare Systems and Practices: 2 fractional worksHealth, Medicine and Society: 2 fractional worksLinguistics and Discourse Analysis: 2 fractional worksSocial and Economic Solidarity: 2 fractional worksEducation, sociology, and vocational training: 2 fractional worksAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues: 2 fractional worksLegal and Policy Issues: 1 fractional works
Urban StudiesSociology and Political ScienceGeneral Health ProfessionsPhilosophy1 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Social Sciences and Governance Urban Studies 7 works
  2. 2 French Urban and Social Studies Sociology and Political Science 4 works
  3. 3 Social Policies and Family Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  4. 4 Healthcare Systems and Practices General Health Professions 2 works
  5. 5 Health, Medicine and Society General Health Professions 2 works
  6. 6 Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Philosophy 2 works
  7. 7 Social and Economic Solidarity Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  8. 8 Education, sociology, and vocational training Sociology and Political Science 2 works
  9. 9 Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues General Health Professions 2 works
  10. 10 Legal and Policy Issues Law 1 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available50.6%not open49.4%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors26.0%domestic only74.0%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Pour la Solidarité's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 44% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Pour la Solidarité as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.00026% in 2024.

still counting0.00050%0.0010%0.0015%Pour la Solidarité0.00020% in 202519801990200020102020

Fractional works of Pour la Solidarité over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

How much of it reaches the world top 10%

Year by year, against all institutions in the same year.

5%10%15%all institutions10.0% in 2022Pour la Solidarité10.0% in 20222020

Of each year's output, the share that reached the world's 10% most cited for its field and year. Peak 13.8% in 2021.

Other research institutions in Brussels

All research institutions in Brussels

Share Pour la Solidarité's ranking

Pour la Solidarité on Science Explorer

A card with Pour la Solidarité's standing and the fields it leads in, for a post or a slide. A link to this page previews as the same card.

Download the card

1200 × 630 PNG, sized for social posts, drawn from the latest snapshot.

Badges for a website1Each links back here and updates with every snapshot

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Pour la Solidarité. Posts are plain text and can be reported.