Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Nashua · United States

QmagiQ (United States)

qmagiq.comROR OpenAlex
Research works
16
▼ 24% vs 2018-21
Citations
180
11.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
25.5%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
11%
world 40%
International
11%
world 18%
QmagiQ (United States)

Not ranked overall: QmagiQ (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does QmagiQ (United States) work in?

In all years, 97% of research at QmagiQ (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 1% in Life Sciences. Its largest fields are Engineering (70%), Physics and Astronomy (17%), Materials Science (5%). It does 1.9× the world's share of Physical Sciences.

Physical Sciences: 15 fractional works · 96.8% of its workEngineering: 11 fractional works · 69.6% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 6 fractional works · 35.7% of its workAerospace Engineering: 3 fractional works · 22.0% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 1 fractional works · 8.4% of its workMechanics of Materials: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 3 fractional works · 16.9% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 2 fractional works · 11.4% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workInstrumentation: 0 fractional works · 2.1% of its workCondensed Matter Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workRadiation: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workMaterials Science: 1 fractional works · 5.4% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 1 fractional works · 4.6% of its workElectronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workChemistry: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workSpectroscopy: 1 fractional works · 4.0% of its workEnvironmental Science: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workSocial Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workALL ITS WORKQmagiQ (UnitedStates)16fractional works, all years
Life Sciences1%Physical Sciences97%Health Sciences1%Social Sciences1%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 8 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering1169.6%
    2. Physics and Astronomy316.9%
    3. Materials Science15.4%
    4. Chemistry14.0%
    5. Environmental Science00.9%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences01.1%
    1. Health Professions01.1%
    1. Social Sciences01.1%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 2.49× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Engineering: 2.85× its world share, 1 worksEngineeringMaterials Science: 2.26× its world share, 0 worksMaterials SciencePhysics and Astronomy: 6.21× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 4.49× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsSocial Sciences: 0.94× its world share, 0 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Physics and Astronomy, 6.2×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 6 fields, with their numbers
  1. Physics and Astronomy6.21×0 works
  2. Health Professions4.49×0 works
  3. Engineering2.85×1 works
  4. Agricultural and Biological Sciences2.49×0 works
  5. Materials Science2.26×0 works
  6. Social Sciences0.94×0 works

Who are the top researchers at QmagiQ (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Axel R. Reisinger, Douglas Burrows and Mani Sundaram lead among researchers whose main affiliation is QmagiQ (United States).

  1. 1 Axel R. Reisinger United States · #1,864,168 worldwide 1.3k citations · 66 works
  2. 2 Douglas Burrows United States · #2,452,523 worldwide 196 citations · 15 works
  3. 3 Mani Sundaram United States · #3,261,099 worldwide 736 citations · 45 works
  4. 4 Kelly Patnaude United States · #3,385,406 worldwide 186 citations · 15 works
  5. 5 Jason Bundas United States · #3,809,529 worldwide 217 citations · 21 works
All ranked researchers at QmagiQ (United States)

What are the most cited papers from QmagiQ (United States)?

The most cited paper from QmagiQ (United States) is "A monolithically integrated plasmonic infrared quantum dot camera" (Sang Jun Lee, Zahyun Ku, Ajit V. Barve et al., 2011), with 163 citations. Next come "Mid-IR focal plane array based on type-II InAs∕GaSb strain layer superlattice detector with nBn design" (93) and "Single bump, two-color quantum dot camera" (44).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 A monolithically integrated plasmonic infrared quantum dot camera Sang Jun Lee, Zahyun Ku, Ajit V. Barve et al. · Nature Communications Open access 19 Apr 2011 163
2 Mid-IR focal plane array based on type-II InAs∕GaSb strain layer superlattice detector with nBn design H. S. Kim, Elena A. Plis, Jean‐Baptiste Rodriguez et al. · Applied Physics Letters 5 May 2008 93
3 Single bump, two-color quantum dot camera Eric S. Varley, M. Lenz, S. J. Lee et al. · Applied Physics Letters 20 Aug 2007 44
4 QWIP-based thermal infrared sensor for the Landsat Data Continuity Mission Murzy D. Jhabvala, Dennis C. Reuter, K. K. Choi et al. · Infrared Physics & Technology 10 Jun 2009 38
5 Comparison of Quantum Dots-in-a-Double-Well and Quantum Dots-in-a-Well Focal Plane Arrays in the Long-Wave Infrared Jonathan R. Andrews, Sergio R. Restaino, Scott W. Teare et al. · IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 3 May 2011 19
All 31 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does QmagiQ (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture, Indigenous Studies and Ecology, Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights and Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies.

Indigenous Knowledge Sys…0Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture: 0 fractional worksIndigenous Studies and E…0Indigenous Studies and Ecology: 0 fractional worksIndigenous Health, Educa…0Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights: 0 fractional worksAcoustic Wave Resonator …0Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies: 0 fractional worksInfrared Target Detection Methodologies: 0 fractional worksAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials: 0 fractional worksGaN-based semiconductor …0GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials: 0 fractional worksSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies: 0 fractional worksThermal properties of materials: 0 fractional worksGas Sensing Nanomaterial…0Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors: 0 fractional works
Plant ScienceGeneral Health ProfessionsHealthBiomedical Engineering4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture Plant Science 0 works
  2. 2 Indigenous Studies and Ecology General Health Professions 0 works
  3. 3 Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights Health 0 works
  4. 4 Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies Biomedical Engineering 0 works
  5. 5 Infrared Target Detection Methodologies Aerospace Engineering 0 works
  6. 6 Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
  7. 7 GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials Condensed Matter Physics 0 works
  8. 8 Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works
  9. 9 Thermal properties of materials Materials Chemistry 0 works
  10. 10 Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors Electrical and Electronic Engineering 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available11.3%not open88.7%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors11.2%domestic only88.8%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has QmagiQ (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 24% lower than in 2018-2021.

still counting2010201520202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is QmagiQ (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.0000024% in 2024.

still counting0.000050%0.00010%0.00015%QmagiQ (United States)0.0000056% in 202520102020

Fractional works of QmagiQ (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Nashua

All research institutions in Nashua

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about QmagiQ (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.