Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Company · Dallas · United States

Technical Resource Group (United States)

dreamjob.com/index.htmlROR OpenAlex
Research works
95
▲ 194% vs 2018-21
Citations
931
9.8 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
11.0%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
37%
world 40%
International
16%
world 18%
Technical Resource Group (United States)

Not ranked overall: Technical Resource Group (United States) is under the volume floor below which an excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does Technical Resource Group (United States) work in?

In 2022-now, 40% of research at Technical Resource Group (United States) is in Physical Sciences, 28% in Health Sciences. Its largest fields are Medicine (16%), Engineering (14%), Psychology (14%).

Physical Sciences: 11 fractional works · 40.3% of its workEngineering: 4 fractional works · 14.2% of its workCivil and Structural Engineering: 2 fractional works · 7.6% of its workAutomotive Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.3% of its workMechanical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workAerospace Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workMedia Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workControl and Systems Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBuilding and Construction: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workMechanics of Materials: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Science: 3 fractional works · 12.1% of its workEcology: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workWater Science and Technology: 1 fractional works · 3.0% of its workIndustrial and Manufacturing Engineering: 1 fractional works · 2.4% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workNature and Landscape Conservation: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth, Toxicology and Mutagenesis: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workComputer Science: 2 fractional works · 8.6% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workInformation Systems: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workSignal Processing: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workComputational Theory and Mathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.1% of its workOceanography: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGeochemistry and Petrology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workGeophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMaterials Science: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workMaterials Chemistry: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workPhysics and Astronomy: 0 fractional works · 0.9% of its workAstronomy and Astrophysics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNuclear and High Energy Physics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMathematics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workStatistics and Probability: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHealth Sciences: 8 fractional works · 27.6% of its workMedicine: 5 fractional works · 16.5% of its workEmergency Medicine: 1 fractional works · 3.6% of its workRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine: 1 fractional works · 2.5% of its workEpidemiology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workPharmacology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workInfectious Diseases: 0 fractional works · 1.1% of its workPathology and Forensic Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPhysiology: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workReproductive Medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workPsychiatry and Mental health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workRheumatology: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workComplementary and alternative medicine: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workOncology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workNephrology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workHealth Professions: 3 fractional works · 11.2% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 3 fractional works · 11.0% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 7 fractional works · 27.1% of its workPsychology: 4 fractional works · 14.0% of its workClinical Psychology: 2 fractional works · 8.4% of its workSocial Psychology: 1 fractional works · 4.4% of its workApplied Psychology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSocial Sciences: 2 fractional works · 7.0% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 1.9% of its workSociology and Political Science: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workPolitical Science and International Relations: 0 fractional works · 1.5% of its workPublic Administration: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workHuman Factors and Ergonomics: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workDecision Sciences: 1 fractional works · 3.5% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workManagement Science and Operations Research: 0 fractional works · 1.7% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workConservation: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.6% of its workHistory: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workManagement of Technology and Innovation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workEconomics and Econometrics: 0 fractional works · 0.2% of its workLife Sciences: 1 fractional works · 5.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 1 fractional works · 2.8% of its workPlant Science: 0 fractional works · 1.6% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workFood Science: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workForestry: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.0% of its workNeuroscience: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workNeurology: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workCancer Research: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workMolecular Biology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workImmunology and Microbiology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workImmunology: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workALL ITS WORKTechnicalResource Group…28fractional works, 2022-now
Life Sciences5%Physical Sciences40%Health Sciences28%Social Sciences27%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in 2022-now. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 20 fields, with their numbers
    1. Engineering414.2%
    2. Environmental Science312.1%
    3. Computer Science28.6%
    4. Earth and Planetary Sciences12.1%
    5. Materials Science01.8%
    6. Physics and Astronomy00.9%
    7. Mathematics00.3%
    8. Energy00.3%
    1. Medicine516.5%
    2. Health Professions311.2%
    1. Psychology414.0%
    2. Social Sciences27.0%
    3. Decision Sciences13.5%
    4. Arts and Humanities01.6%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.8%
    6. Economics, Econometrics and Finance00.2%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences12.8%
    2. Neuroscience01.2%
    3. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology00.7%
    4. Immunology and Microbiology00.3%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.59× its world share, 1 worksAgricultural and Bio…Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology: 0.13× its world share, 0 worksBiochemistry, Geneti…Immunology and Microbiology: 0.30× its world share, 0 worksImmunology and Micro…Neuroscience: 0.75× its world share, 0 worksNeuroscienceComputer Science: 1.11× its world share, 2 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1.31× its world share, 1 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.26× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.95× its world share, 4 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 2.44× its world share, 3 worksEnvironmental ScienceMaterials Science: 0.52× its world share, 0 worksMaterials ScienceMathematics: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksMathematicsPhysics and Astronomy: 0.40× its world share, 0 worksPhysics and AstronomyHealth Professions: 4.23× its world share, 3 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.86× its world share, 4 worksMedicineArts and Humanities: 0.56× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0.25× its world share, 0 worksBusiness, Management…Decision Sciences: 3.61× its world share, 1 worksDecision SciencesEconomics, Econometrics and Finance: 0.09× its world share, 0 worksEconomics, Econometr…Psychology: 4.59× its world share, 4 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 0.55× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Psychology, 4.6×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 20 fields, with their numbers
  1. Psychology4.59×4 works
  2. Health Professions4.23×3 works
  3. Decision Sciences3.61×1 works
  4. Environmental Science2.44×3 works
  5. Earth and Planetary Sciences1.31×1 works
  6. Computer Science1.11×2 works
  7. Engineering0.95×4 works
  8. Medicine0.86×4 works
  9. Neuroscience0.75×0 works
  10. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.59×1 works
  11. Arts and Humanities0.56×0 works
  12. Social Sciences0.55×2 works
  13. Materials Science0.52×0 works
  14. Physics and Astronomy0.40×0 works
  15. Immunology and Microbiology0.30×0 works
  16. Energy0.26×0 works
  17. Mathematics0.25×0 works
  18. Business, Management and Accounting0.25×0 works
  19. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology0.13×0 works
  20. Economics, Econometrics and Finance0.09×0 works

Who are the top researchers at Technical Resource Group (United States)?

Ranked on the quality score, Alan F. Kay, Judith J. Baker and Sam R. Allen lead among researchers whose main affiliation is Technical Resource Group (United States).

  1. 1 Alan F. Kay United States · #2,388,326 worldwide 304 citations · 17 works
  2. 2 Judith J. Baker United States · #4,088,720 worldwide 274 citations · 17 works
  3. 3 Sam R. Allen United States · #4,105,928 worldwide 36 citations · 17 works
All ranked researchers at Technical Resource Group (United States)

What are the most cited papers from Technical Resource Group (United States)?

The most cited paper from Technical Resource Group (United States) is "Artificial intelligence in dental research: Checklist for authors, reviewers, readers" (Falk Schwendicke, Tarry Singh, Jae‐Hong Lee et al., 2021), with 373 citations. Next come "A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone" (289) and "Combining Influenza and COVID-19 Booster Vaccination Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" (139).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 Artificial intelligence in dental research: Checklist for authors, reviewers, readers Falk Schwendicke, Tarry Singh, Jae‐Hong Lee et al. · Journal of Dentistry 22 Feb 2021 373
2 A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone David J. Nowak, Kevin L. Civerolo, S. Trivikrama Rao et al. · Atmospheric Environment 2000 289
3 Combining Influenza and COVID-19 Booster Vaccination Strategy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nikolaos Tzenios, Mary Tazanios, Mohamad A. Chahine · SSRN Electronic Journal PreprintOpen access 2022 139
4 Ethnic Identity, Gay Identity, Sexual Sensation Seeking and HIV Risk Taking Among Multiethnic Men Who Have Sex with Men Chwee Lye Chng, Jesús A. Géliga-Vargas · AIDS Education and Prevention Aug 2000 100
5 On Becoming a Male Sex Worker in Mysore: Sexual Subjectivity, “Empowerment,” and Community‐Based HIV Prevention Research Robert R. Lorway, Sushena Reza‐Paul, Akram Pasha · Medical Anthropology Quarterly 11 May 2009 84
All 96 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which keywords describe research at Technical Resource Group (United States)?

By fractional works in 2022-now, weighted toward what it does more of than the world: Mental Health, Machine Learning, Guidelines, Psychological Resilience, Children, Depression, Meta-Analysis and Management.

▲ more of its work than of the world's◆ about the world's share▼ less than the world's

Size is fractional works in 2022-now in the topics tagged with each word; colour is the word's share of this institution's work against its share of the world's. The 21 words are chosen for being large and distinctive. Each links to the topic it comes from most.

All 21 words, with their numbers
  1. Mental Health3▲ 6.9×9 topics
  2. Machine Learning2▲ 2.8×9 topics
  3. Climate Change2▲ 2.6×10 topics
  4. Epidemiology2▲ 1.56×8 topics
  5. Deep Learning2▲ 1.70×6 topics
  6. Guidelines2▲ 12×3 topics
  7. Depression1▲ 5.6×4 topics
  8. Children1▲ 21×2 topics
  9. Diagnosis1▲ 5.1×4 topics
  10. Management1▲ 5.8×3 topics
  11. Psychological Resilience1▲ 54×2 topics
  12. Meta-Analysis1▲ 7.2×2 topics
  13. Quality of Life1▲ 2.9×4 topics
  14. Artificial Intelligence1▲ 2.8×4 topics
  15. Big Data1▲ 4.3×3 topics
  16. Health Promotion1▲ 12×2 topics
  17. Public Health1▲ 2.7×5 topics
  18. Risk Assessment1▲ 6.0×2 topics
  19. Antibiotic Therapy1▲ 61×1 topic
  20. Appendicitis1▲ 128×1 topic
  21. Stress1▲ 9.9×3 topics

Which research topics does Technical Resource Group (United States) publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Research studies in Vietnam, Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management, Mental Health and Patient Involvement and Health, psychology, and well-being.

Research studies in Viet…1Research studies in Vietnam: 1 fractional worksAppendicitis Diagnosis a…1Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management: 1 fractional worksMental Health and Patient Involvement: 1 fractional worksHealth, psychology, and well-being: 1 fractional worksMental Health Treatment and Access: 1 fractional worksResilience and Mental Health: 1 fractional worksHealth Policy Implementation Science: 1 fractional worksBig Data Technologies an…0Big Data Technologies and Applications: 0 fractional worksAdvanced Neural Network Applications: 0 fractional worksTechnology and Data Analysis: 0 fractional works
EcologyEmergency MedicineGeneral Health ProfessionsSocial Psychology4 others

Area is fractional works; colour is the subfield each topic belongs to.

  1. 1 Research studies in Vietnam Ecology 1 works
  2. 2 Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management Emergency Medicine 1 works
  3. 3 Mental Health and Patient Involvement General Health Professions 1 works
  4. 4 Health, psychology, and well-being General Health Professions 1 works
  5. 5 Mental Health Treatment and Access Social Psychology 1 works
  6. 6 Resilience and Mental Health Clinical Psychology 1 works
  7. 7 Health Policy Implementation Science General Health Professions 1 works
  8. 8 Big Data Technologies and Applications Information Systems and Management 0 works
  9. 9 Advanced Neural Network Applications Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 0 works
  10. 10 Technology and Data Analysis Information Systems 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available37.0%not open63.0%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors16.1%domestic only83.9%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has Technical Resource Group (United States)'s research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 194% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting1990200020102020
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is Technical Resource Group (United States) as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000047% in 2024.

still counting0.00020%0.00040%0.00060%Technical Resource Group (United States)0.00013% in 20251990200020102020

Fractional works of Technical Resource Group (United States) over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Dallas

All research institutions in Dallas

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about Technical Resource Group (United States). Posts are plain text and can be reported.