Science Explorer Back to mapMap
Discussion
Institution · Easton · United States

The Nurture Nature Center

Research works
9
▲ 287% vs 2018-21
Citations
124
13.4 per fractional work
Top-10% rate
7.1%
all institutions 10.0%
Open access
46%
world 40%
International
22%
world 18%

Not ranked overall: The Nurture Nature Center is under the volume floor below which a citation excellence rate is noise. Not ranked is not the same as ranked last.

Which fields of science does The Nurture Nature Center work in?

In all years, 45% of research at The Nurture Nature Center is in Social Sciences, 42% in Physical Sciences. Its largest fields are Social Sciences (32%), Environmental Science (24%), Earth and Planetary Sciences (9%). It does 1.4× the world's share of Social Sciences.

Social Sciences: 4 fractional works · 45.0% of its workSocial Sciences: 3 fractional works · 32.3% of its workSociology and Political Science: 2 fractional works · 20.8% of its workEducation: 1 fractional works · 6.0% of its workCommunication: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workDemography: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workGeography, Planning and Development: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workSafety Research: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workHealth: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workTransportation: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workPsychology: 1 fractional works · 7.9% of its workSocial Psychology: 0 fractional works · 4.3% of its workDevelopmental and Educational Psychology: 0 fractional works · 3.6% of its workArts and Humanities: 0 fractional works · 4.0% of its workVisual Arts and Performing Arts: 0 fractional works · 3.6% of its workHistory and Philosophy of Science: 0 fractional works · 0.3% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workDecision Sciences: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workInformation Systems and Management: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workBusiness, Management and Accounting: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workPhysical Sciences: 4 fractional works · 42.1% of its workEnvironmental Science: 2 fractional works · 24.1% of its workGlobal and Planetary Change: 2 fractional works · 18.2% of its workEnvironmental Engineering: 0 fractional works · 3.1% of its workEcology: 0 fractional works · 1.0% of its workManagement, Monitoring, Policy and Law: 0 fractional works · 0.8% of its workWater Science and Technology: 0 fractional works · 0.7% of its workPollution: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workEarth and Planetary Sciences: 1 fractional works · 8.6% of its workAtmospheric Science: 1 fractional works · 8.6% of its workComputer Science: 1 fractional works · 6.3% of its workArtificial Intelligence: 0 fractional works · 4.6% of its workHuman-Computer Interaction: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workEngineering: 0 fractional works · 2.7% of its workOcean Engineering: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workElectrical and Electronic Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workBiomedical Engineering: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workEnergy: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment: 0 fractional works · 0.5% of its workHealth Sciences: 1 fractional works · 9.9% of its workMedicine: 1 fractional works · 7.6% of its workPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health: 0 fractional works · 3.9% of its workPediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health: 0 fractional works · 3.6% of its workSmaller subfields together: 0 fractional works · 0.1% of its workNursing: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workIssues, ethics and legal aspects: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workHealth Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workGeneral Health Professions: 0 fractional works · 0.4% of its workLife Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workAgricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 3.0% of its workEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics: 0 fractional works · 1.8% of its workGeneral Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0 fractional works · 1.2% of its workALL ITS WORKThe NurtureNature Center9fractional works, all years
Life Sciences3%Physical Sciences42%Health Sciences10%Social Sciences45%

Each ring splits the one inside it: the four domains of science, their fields, their subfields. Size is fractional works in all years. Every slice is a page; the interactive view zooms down to single topics and colours each by how much more of it this institution does than the world.

Its 4 domains and 14 fields, with their numbers
    1. Social Sciences332.3%
    2. Psychology17.9%
    3. Arts and Humanities04.0%
    4. Decision Sciences00.7%
    5. Business, Management and Accounting00.1%
    1. Environmental Science224.1%
    2. Earth and Planetary Sciences18.6%
    3. Computer Science16.3%
    4. Engineering02.7%
    5. Energy00.5%
    1. Medicine17.6%
    2. Nursing01.8%
    3. Health Professions00.4%
    1. Agricultural and Biological Sciences03.0%
All of science, and how each field's share has moved since 1950: the Science domain explorer

Field profile

Location quotient across every field it publishes in: outside the ring is more than an institution of this size would be expected to publish, inside it is less.

Agricultural and Biological Sciences: 0.51× its world share, 0 worksAgricultural and Bio…Computer Science: 1.09× its world share, 1 worksComputer ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences: 4.75× its world share, 0 worksEarth and Planetary …Energy: 0.76× its world share, 0 worksEnergyEngineering: 0.24× its world share, 0 worksEngineeringEnvironmental Science: 3.52× its world share, 1 worksEnvironmental ScienceHealth Professions: 0.20× its world share, 0 worksHealth ProfessionsMedicine: 0.53× its world share, 1 worksMedicineNursing: 4.96× its world share, 0 worksNursingArts and Humanities: 1.85× its world share, 0 worksArts and HumanitiesDecision Sciences: 0.96× its world share, 0 worksDecision SciencesPsychology: 3.19× its world share, 1 worksPsychologySocial Sciences: 2.42× its world share, 2 worksSocial Sciences1×world share
more than its size predictsabout as predictedless

Rings at 0.5×, 1× and 2×. Widest outward: Nursing, 5.0×. Every wedge is a field page.

All 13 fields, with their numbers
  1. Nursing4.96×0 works
  2. Earth and Planetary Sciences4.75×0 works
  3. Environmental Science3.52×1 works
  4. Psychology3.19×1 works
  5. Social Sciences2.42×2 works
  6. Arts and Humanities1.85×0 works
  7. Computer Science1.09×1 works
  8. Decision Sciences0.96×0 works
  9. Energy0.76×0 works
  10. Medicine0.53×1 works
  11. Agricultural and Biological Sciences0.51×0 works
  12. Engineering0.24×0 works
  13. Health Professions0.20×0 works

Who are the top researchers at The Nurture Nature Center?

Ranked on the quality score, Kathryn Alese Semmens, Keri Maxfield and Rachel Hogan Carr lead among researchers whose main affiliation is The Nurture Nature Center.

  1. 1 Kathryn Alese Semmens United States · #1,647,935 worldwide 1.2k citations · 64 works
  2. 2 Keri Maxfield United States · #1,955,195 worldwide 132 citations · 19 works
  3. 3 Rachel Hogan Carr United States · #2,077,990 worldwide 277 citations · 36 works
All ranked researchers at The Nurture Nature Center

What are the most cited papers from The Nurture Nature Center?

The most cited paper from The Nurture Nature Center is "The Evaporative Stress Index as an indicator of agricultural drought in Brazil: An assessment based on crop yield impacts" (Martha C. Anderson, Cornélio Alberto Zolin, Paulo César Sentelhas et al., 2015), with 381 citations. Next come "Daily Landsat-scale evapotranspiration estimation over a forested landscape in North Carolina, USA, using multi-satellite data fusion" (107) and "Challenges and Opportunities in Numerical Weather Prediction" (96).

Most cited papers
#PaperReleasedCitations
1 The Evaporative Stress Index as an indicator of agricultural drought in Brazil: An assessment based on crop yield impacts Martha C. Anderson, Cornélio Alberto Zolin, Paulo César Sentelhas et al. · Remote Sensing of Environment Open access 18 Dec 2015 381
2 Daily Landsat-scale evapotranspiration estimation over a forested landscape in North Carolina, USA, using multi-satellite data fusion Yun Yang, Martha C. Anderson, Feng Gao et al. · Hydrology and earth system sciences Open access 17 Feb 2017 107
3 Challenges and Opportunities in Numerical Weather Prediction Jerald A. Brotzge, Don Berchoff, DaNa L. Carlis et al. · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Open access 20 Feb 2023 96
4 Comparison of satellite-derived LAI and precipitation anomalies over Brazil with a thermal infrared-based Evaporative Stress Index for 2003–2013 Martha C. Anderson, Cornélio Alberto Zolin, Christopher Hain et al. · Journal of Hydrology Open access 11 Feb 2015 89
5 Effectively Communicating Risk and Uncertainty to the Public: Assessing the National Weather Service’s Flood Forecast and Warning Tools Rachel Hogan Carr, Burrell E. Montz, Keri Maxfield et al. · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 10 Dec 2015 48
All 32 most cited papers, with filters and sorting

Which research topics does The Nurture Nature Center publish most on?

By volume in 2022-now: Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Disaster Management and Resilience, Participatory Visual Research Methods and Educational Games and Gamification.

  1. 1 Flood Risk Assessment and Management Global and Planetary Change 1 works
  2. 2 Disaster Management and Resilience Sociology and Political Science 1 works
  3. 3 Participatory Visual Research Methods Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  4. 4 Educational Games and Gamification Developmental and Educational Psychology 0 works
  5. 5 Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 0 works
  6. 6 Educational Environments and Student Outcomes Education 0 works
  7. 7 Place Attachment and Urban Studies Sociology and Political Science 0 works
  8. 8 Art Education and Development Visual Arts and Performing Arts 0 works
  9. 9 Mental Health Treatment and Access Social Psychology 0 works
  10. 10 Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 0 works

How open and international is its research?

Against the world's own shares: the tick on each track. Both are shares of its output, so they sit on one scale and can be read against each other as well as against the world.

openly available46.1%not open53.9%

World: 40% of research is openly available.

with international co-authors22.4%domestic only77.6%

World: 18% is written across borders.

How has The Nurture Nature Center's research output changed?

Output in 2022-2025 was 287% higher than in 2018-2021.

still counting20202025
grewheldshrank

The same series as a ribbon: one cell per year, darker for more. The line above answers how much; this answers when.

Its share of all research

Growing output can still be a shrinking share: all of science grows. This is The Nurture Nature Center as a percentage of every work published that year, 0.000033% in 2024.

still counting0.000020%0.000040%The Nurture Nature Center0.000015% in 20252020

Fractional works of The Nurture Nature Center over all fractional works that year. How the balance of science has shifted.

Other research institutions in Easton

All research institutions in Easton

Research measures only: rankings here say nothing about teaching, admissions or student experience. Comparable institutions and collaboration partners have tabs of their own, above.

Discussion

Ask a question or share a note about The Nurture Nature Center. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.