Ignacio Neumann
Ignacio Neumann publishes mostly in General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, on topics such as Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Clinical practice guidelines implementation and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management.
- World rank
- #24,624 of 7,710,434 ranked researchers
- Rank in Canada
- #569 of 183,316
- Works
- 172
- Citations
- 15k
- Citations per work
- 89.1
What does Ignacio Neumann research?
Ignacio Neumann's work is mostly in Medicine (29%), Health Professions (15%), Decision Sciences (13%).
Their six largest subfields, inside their fields and domains; the grey slice is everything else they publish. The interactive view splits every one of their works down to single topics.
The fields and subfields, with their numbers
- Health Sciences7644.4%
- Medicine5129.4%
- Health Professions2615.0%
- Everything else6537.7%
- Social Sciences3117.9%
- 1General Health Professions15% of their works
- 2Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health14% of their works
- 3Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty13% of their works
- 4Internal Medicine9% of their works
- 5Surgery7% of their works
- 6Economics and Econometrics5% of their works
Research topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
- Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Which keywords describe Ignacio Neumann's research?
The keywords of their largest research topics: Quality Assessment, Publication Bias, Diagnosis, Antithrombotic Therapy, Meta-Analysis, PRISMA Statement, Clinical Guidelines and Guideline Development.
- Pharmaceutical Industry
- Thrombin
- Thrombosis
- Quality of Life
- Qualitative Research
- Venous Thromboembolism
- Guideline Development
- PRISMA Statement
- Antithrombotic Therapy
- Publication Bias
- Quality Assessment
- Diagnosis
- Meta-Analysis
- Clinical Guidelines
- Pulmonary Embolism
- Implementation Science
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
- Protease-Activated Receptors
- Conflict of Interest
Size is their works in the topics tagged with each word, from their 8 largest topics. Each links to the topic it comes from most. The words come from the keyword list OpenAlex gives each topic, not from the text of the papers, so a word can appear that none of the papers uses.
All 20 words, with their numbers
- Quality Assessment1012 topics
- Publication Bias632 topics
- Diagnosis572 topics
- Antithrombotic Therapy542 topics
- Meta-Analysis541 topic
- PRISMA Statement541 topic
- Clinical Guidelines471 topic
- Guideline Development471 topic
- Pulmonary Embolism431 topic
- Venous Thromboembolism431 topic
- Implementation Science371 topic
- Qualitative Research371 topic
- Cost-effectiveness Analysis231 topic
- Quality of Life231 topic
- Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia141 topic
- Thrombosis141 topic
- Protease-Activated Receptors111 topic
- Thrombin111 topic
- Conflict of Interest91 topic
- Pharmaceutical Industry91 topic
Where does Ignacio Neumann work?
Ignacio Neumann's main affiliation in the publication record is McMaster University, Canada.
How many publications and citations does Ignacio Neumann have?
OpenAlex counts 172 works and 15,322 citations for Ignacio Neumann, an h-index of 46, ranking #24,624 of 7,710,434 researchers worldwide on the quality score.
Ranked on field-normalised citation excellence (50%), output (30%) and citations (20%). Counts come from OpenAlex author records, which occasionally merge different people who share a name or split one person into several.
Papers, co-authors, who cited this work and researchers on the nearest topics have tabs of their own, above. Is this your page? Claim it with your ORCID iD, or request a correction or removal.
Discussion
Ask a question or share a note about Ignacio Neumann. Keep it to the research: no personal attacks, advertising or links. Any reader can report a post, which collapses it for everyone until it is opened.